without permission in writing from RAND (original) (raw)
Related papers
Review of Methods and Framework For a New Approach
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND Science and Technology (S&T), one of RAND's research units, assists government and corporate decisionmakers in developing options to address challenges created by scientific innovation, rapid technological change, and world events. RAND S&T's research agenda is diverse. Its main areas of concentration are science and technology aspects of energy supply and use; environmental studies; transportation planning; space and aerospace issues; information infrastructure; biotechnology; and the federal R&D portfolio. iv Inquiries regarding RAND Science and Technology may be directed to:
Developing a Risk Assessment Methodology for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.
Public PoPcy and the Qucbec Aerospace Sector
2015
National Library 1+1. cana, Bibliothèque nationale du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bi bliographic Services services bibliographiques 395 Weilington Street 395. rue Wellington OttawaON K l A O N 4 OttawaON K l A W canada canada The author has granted a nonexclusive Licence ailowing the National Library of Canada to reproduce, loan, distribute or seli copies of this thesis in microform, paper or electronic formats. L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive permettant à la Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou vendre des copies de cette thèse sous la forme de microfiche/h, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantiai extracts fkom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or othenvise de celle-ci ne doivent être impiimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation.
A Review of Contemporary Science and Technology Policy Research: Recent Trends and Future Directions
Social Science Research Network, 2017
The societal impacts of scientific and technological advances-whether desirable or undesirable-have been one of the primary foci of contemporary policy research, much of which employs distinct interdisciplinary approaches. In this paper, we seek to characterize the topical, methodological, theoretical, and geographical trends of recent science and technology policy studies. Utilizing reputable scholarly journals within the related subfield of policy science, we review the recent research articles on science and technology policy as they relate to policy development, while paying particular attention to capturing any systemic patterns of trends. We conclude with a discussion of the various ramifications of our findings for future research directions and, in the process, highlight issues including technological innovation and diffusion, science and technology for sustainable energy development, evidence-based decisionmaking, and information technology and cyber security.
RAND Review: Vol. 37, No. 1, Summer 2013
2013
RAND Review is published periodically by the RAND Corporation, a nonprofit institution. The mission of the RAND Corporation is to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. Opinions are those of the authors and do not reflect positions taken by RAND, its board, or its clients.
RAND Review: Vol. 36, No. 1, Spring 2012
RAND Review is published periodically by the rand Corporation, a nonprofit institution. The mission of the rand Corporation is to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. opinions are those of the authors and do not reflect positions taken by rand, its board, or its clients.
A policy-oriented literature review
2017
Readers are encouraged to reproduce material from ODI Reports for their own publications, as long as they are not being sold commercially. As copyright holder, ODI requests due acknowledgement and a copy of the publication. For online use, we ask readers to link to the original resource on the ODI website. The views presented in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of ODI.
Perspectives on policy analyses: a framework for understanding and design
International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 2004
Policy analysis is a broad and versatile field of applied policy research and advice, where a multitude of perspectives and methods have developed. In this paper, we attempt to (re)structure the discipline in a single conceptual model. The model was derived on the basis of a review of relevant literature on policy analysis styles and a review of about 20 exemplary cases in the field of technology, policy and management. The model serves three purposes: understanding of policy analysis as a discipline, contribution to the design of new policy analysis methods and projects, and guidance for evaluating such methods and projects. The model identifies six activities and translates these into six underlying policy analytic styles. Each style implies different values, and calls for different criteria when it comes to evaluation. An important claim of the model is that, in practice, policy analysis consists of creatively combining these activities and styles. . His area of specialisation includes the development and application of (interactive and participatory) methods for policy analysis and (group) decision support, in particular gaming-simulation.
The economic content of science and technology policy analysis
2004
The Open University's repository of research publications and other research outputs The economic content of science and technology policy analysis Other How to cite: Clark, Norman (2004). The economic content of science and technology policy analysis. Xavier Management Institute. For guidance on citations see FAQs. c [not recorded] Version: [not recorded] Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open Research Online's data policy on reuse of materials please consult the policies page.