Revisiting the Composition of Ezra-Nehemiah: In Conversation with Jacob Wright's Rebuilding Identity: The Nehemiah Memoir and its Earliest Readers (BZAW, 348; Berlin: de Gruyter, 2004) (original) (raw)
2007, Journal of Hebrew Scriptures
This conversation with Jacob L. Wright, Rebuilding Identity: The Nehemiah Memoir and its Earliest Readers (BZAW, 348; Berlin: de Gruyter, 2004) began in a special session of the Chronicles-Ezra-Nehemiah section that was held at the national meeting of the Society of Biblical Literature in November 2006 (Washington, DC). It includes an introduction by the editor and contributions by Deirdre N. Fulton, David M. Carr, Ralph W. Klein and a response by Jacob L. Wright.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research.
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
Nehemiah's New Shadow: Reading and Rereading the Ezra-Nehemiah Narrative (STR)
Southeastern Theological Review, 2018
Ezra-Nehemiah is sometimes interpreted as a positive portrayal of the return of Israel from exile. Ezra 1 begins with a prophetic expectation of return and restoration. However, the conclusion of the book in Nehemiah 13 emphasizes that although the people have rebuilt the temple, restored the walls, and repopulated Jerusalem, they have still failed to keep the demands of the Mosaic covenant. The sober tone of this final chapter prompts a rereading of the narrative as a whole. Rereading the book in light of the conclusion highlights a distinct pattern of tensions throughout the story. A central textual strategy of the author subtly demonstrates the recurrence of pre-exilic conditions in the post-exilic community. Rather than a subsidiary appendix or epilogue, then, Nehemiah 13 represents perhaps the culminating capstone of the composition.
The structure of Ezra-Nehemiah as a literary unit
Verbum et Ecclesia, 2021
The OT books, Ezra and Nehemiah, are to be considered as one book. This is more or less the common conviction of most OT scholars today. However, their redaction process raises many questions. What is their relation to the book of Chronicles, and how is their actual structure to be understood? Why do we find two almost identical lists of returnees from exile in Ezra 2 and Nehemiah 7? What about the differences between these lists? This article understands the structure of Ezra-Nehemiah as a consciously created literary unit, where the two lists of returnees serve as an important part of the literary structure. The author works on the assumption of the so-called new literary criticism, understanding the narrative in the book on a synchronic basis. He shows that the book of Ezra-Nehemiah can indeed be understood as one literary unit, and that the two lists of returnees function as a literary means to structure the book. There is therefore no need to ‘re-organise’ the narrated events i...
In this paper, I will try to show that the final text of Ezra-Nehemiah cannot be regarded as a unity. Even the sub-sections of the composition (Ezra 1-6, Ezra material and the Nehemiah memoir) are the result of heavy editing and cannot be used in the final form for historical purposes. The only possibility to use the text for historical purposes is to try to identify the directions of textual development by a careful literary and redaction critical approach. Already the differences between the three main witnesses (the Masoretic text, Esdras a and Esdras b) imply considerable editorial activity. There is, therefore, ‘empirical evidence’ that the text was exposed to additions and reorganization of text in the early stages of its textual transmission. The merger of three originally unrelated texts (Ezra 1-6, Ezra material and the Nehemiah memoir) into one composition created even more tensions and confusion. The text of Ezra-Nehemiah can be characterized as a constantly expanding corpus, a “snowball”. Since the editors did not rewrite the older text, the final text contains conceptions from various authors and editors who were active in different periods and who primarily wrote to an audience in their own historical context. In the final text, these additions are mixed and remain partly in contradiction with one another.
A Biblical Theological Approach to Ezra & Nehemiah
The books of Ezra and Nehemiah were recorded by one author and unified on a single scroll in the Hebrew Bible, which suggests that the two books should be read in tandem, at least with one another if not in light of all Scripture. This essay argues that the biblical theological approach to reading the books of Ezra and Nehemiah is absolutely crucial in comprehending their unique contribution to God’s big plans n redemptive history. In doing so, this essay seeks to show that such an approach is much more than an enriching methodology or supplemental hermeneutical option. In this regard, the essay considers how the disappointment of the Second Temple in Ezra vis-à-vis all other mentions of God’s Temple in Scripture distinguishes its unique role in God’s salvation plan. Further, I will also examine how the deflating conclusion of Judah’s covenant-breaking in Nehemiah suggests that the end of Israel’s physical exile at the close of Old Testament history changed little about their spiritual exile from Yahweh.
Between the Traditional and the Innovative: Ezra-Nehemiah in Current Research
Religion Compass, 2009
This article attempts to bring together the main threads of Ezra-Nehemiah research undertaken during the past 15 years, locating it in the larger framework of biblical studies and identifying possible fruitful avenues of future research. Areas covered in this article include the text and interpretation of Ezra-Nehemiah, current issues in the discussion of the history and material culture of the Persian period, the impetus of sociology and anthropology for the study of Ezra-Nehemiah and studies dealing with the theology/ideology and religion portrayed in Ezra-Nehemiah.
A Piety in the Reader's Face: The Problem of Reading Ezra-Nehemiah
2011
This article challenges popular prevailing opinion that the post-exile characters of Ezra, Nehemiah, and Zebabbabel are intended to serve as positive role models for godly leadership. On closer scrutiny, their sincere and zealous intentions are comprised by significant flaws and sins. The true hope for Israel, and for positive role models for leadership, lie elsewhere. MIQRA (2011): 8-15
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Related papers
The Belief System of the Book of Nehemiah
B. Becking and M.C.A. Korpel (eds.), The Crisis of Israelite Religion: Transformation of Religious Tradition in Exilic and Post-Exilic Times (OTS 42; Leiden), 276-87, 1999