Statistical Analysis of Treatment Planning Parameters for Prediction of Delivery Quality Assurance Failure for Helical Tomotherapy (original ) (raw )Feasibility on Statistical Process Control Analysis of Delivery Quality Assurance in Helical Tomotherapy
Kyung Hwan Chang
Journal of Radiological Science and Technology
View PDFchevron_right
Treatment Planning to Improve Delivery Accuracy and Patient Throughput in Helical Tomotherapy
Quan Chen
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2009
View PDFchevron_right
Analysis of Clinical Patient-Specific Pre-Treatment Quality Assurance with the New Helical TomoTherapy® Platform, following the AAPM TG-218 Report
Marta Paiusco
2021
View PDFchevron_right
Analysis of modulation factor to shorten the delivery time in helical tomotherapy
Takeshi Kodaira
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
View PDFchevron_right
Tomotherapy treatment plan quality assurance: the impact of applied criteria on passing rate in gamma index method
Michele Stasi
Medical physics, 2013
View PDFchevron_right
WE-D-AUD B-04: Dosimetric Evaluation of a Delivery Verification and Dose Reconstruction Method for Helical Tomotherapy
Kenneth Hogstrom
Medical Physics, 2008
View PDFchevron_right
A Planning Comparison of Dynamic IMRT for Different Collimator Leaf Thicknesses with Helical Tomotherapy and RapidArc for Prostate and Head and Neck Tumors
Peter Kneschaurek
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 2010
View PDFchevron_right
MU-Tomo: Independent Dose Validation Software for Helical TomoTherapy
Nikos Papanikolaou
Journal of Cancer Science & Therapy, 2010
View PDFchevron_right
Application of an independent dose calculation software for estimating the impact of inter-fractional setup shifts in Helical Tomotherapy treatments
Panayiotis Mavroidis
Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB), 2013
View PDFchevron_right
Clinical significance of treatment delivery errors for helical TomoTherapy nasopharyngeal plans - A dosimetric simulation study
Shrikant Deshpande
Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB), 2017
View PDFchevron_right
Optimized planning target volume margin in helical tomotherapy for prostate cancer: Is there a preferred method?
Kyung Hwan Chang
Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 2015
View PDFchevron_right
Setup error analysis in helical tomotherapy based image-guided radiation therapy treatments
Tejpal Gupta
Journal of Medical Physics, 2015
View PDFchevron_right
Pattern of Failure after Helical Tomotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer
Guy Storme
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 2010
View PDFchevron_right
Results of a two-year quality control program for a helical tomotherapy unit
Barbara Longobardi
Radiotherapy and Oncology, 2008
View PDFchevron_right
Comparison of Imrt Delivery Techniques and Helical Tomotherapy Using Pareto Front Evaluation
Per Engstrom
Radiotherapy and Oncology, 2009
View PDFchevron_right
A pre-treatment quality assurance survey on 384 patients treated with helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy
Sara Bresciani
Radiotherapy and Oncology, 2016
View PDFchevron_right
Independent quality assurance of a helical tomotherapy machine using the dose magnifying glass
Ranjini Tolakanahalli
Medical Physics, 2011
View PDFchevron_right
Dosimetric effects of rotational output variation and x-ray target degradation on helical tomotherapy plans
Sanford Meeks
Medical Physics, 2009
View PDFchevron_right
A comparative planning study of step-and-shoot IMRT versus helical tomotherapy for whole-pelvis irradiation in cervical cancer
ekkasit tharavichitkul
Journal of Radiation Research, 2015
View PDFchevron_right
Fast Helical Tomotherapy in a head and neck cancer planning study: is time priceless?
Vincent Gregoire
Radiation oncology (London, England), 2015
View PDFchevron_right
Interfacility variation in treatment planning parameters in tomotherapy: field width, pitch, and modulation factor
Takeshi Kodaira
Journal of Radiation Research
View PDFchevron_right
Plan Quality Index – An Integrated Dosimetric Approach for Plan Evaluation with Consideration of Quality of Dose Coverage to Tumors and Quality of Organs’ Sparing
Jayapalan Krishnan
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 2022
View PDFchevron_right
The sensitivity of ArcCHECK-based gamma analysis to manufactured errors in helical tomotherapy radiation delivery
Julius Turian
Journal of applied clinical medical physics / American College of Medical Physics, 2015
View PDFchevron_right
Pretreatment patient-specific IMRT quality assurance: a correlation study between gamma index and patient clinical dose volume histogram
Michele Stasi
Medical physics, 2012
View PDFchevron_right
Comparison of Plan Quality Provided by Intensity-Modulated Arc Therapy and Helical Tomotherapy
David Shepard
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2007
View PDFchevron_right
Dose–volume and biological-model based comparison between helical tomotherapy and (inverse-planned) IMAT for prostate tumours
Alan E Nahum
Radiotherapy and Oncology, 2008
View PDFchevron_right
Verification dosimetry during treatment for helical tomotherapy using radiographic film
Tomas Kron
Australasian Physics & Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2005
View PDFchevron_right
Dosimetric Comparison of Helical Tomotherapy against Protons in Treating the Prostate Alone
Eduardo Moros
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2009
View PDFchevron_right
A Prospective Evaluation of Helical Tomotherapy
V. Venkatesan , George Rodrigues , Glenn Bauman , Terry Coad , Michael Lock
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2007
View PDFchevron_right
Optimal Combination of Pitch, Modulation Factor and Dosimetric Considerations in Treatment Planning for Total Body Irradiation Using Helical Tomotherapy
Tejinder Kataria
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 2023
View PDFchevron_right