Citizenship: Pushing the Boundaries (original) (raw)
Related papers
Women, Citizenship and Difference
The article discusses some of the major issues which need to be examined in a gendered reading of citizenship. However, its basic claim is that a comparative study of citizenship should consider the issue of women's citizenship not only by contrast to that of men, but also in relation to women's af liation to dominant or subordinate groups, their ethnicity, origin and urban or rural residence. It should also take into consideration global and transnational positionings of these citizenships. The article challenges the gender-blind and Westocentric character of many of the most hegemonic theorizations of citizenship, focusing in particular on the questions of membership in 'the community', group rights and social difference and the ways binaries of public/private and active/passive have been constructed to differentiate between different kinds of citizenships. The article argues that in order to be able to analyse adequately people's citizenship, especially in this era of ethnicization on the one hand and globalization on the other hand, and with the rapid pace at which relationships between states and their civil societies are changing, citizenship should best be analysed as a multi-tiered construct which applies, at the same time to people's membership in sub-, cross-and supra-national collectivities as well as in states.
Citizenship: Review from Feminist Perspectives
Proceedings of the Annual Civic Education Conference (ACEC 2018), 2018
The term citizenship has been traditionally been understood in relation to the rights and responsibilities of citizens within a given nation state. This classic model of citizenship is associated with the work of T.H. Marshall who defined citizenship in terms of three stages of sets of rights: civil or legal rights, political rights and social rights. Since the 1990s debates over the inadequacies of traditional models have led to the development of new ideas about citizenship like citizenship from feminist. This article discusses citizenship from feminist perspectives. This study is theoretical using literature review method based on literature and combined with bibliographic research that focuses on the ideas contained in the theory. This study concludes that a series of dichotomies still exist in traditional citizenship and the divide of the public-private spheres is the most fundamental. The traditional citizenship is strictly limited to rational public sphere, while the private sphere is based on family life. Citizenship operates simultaneously as force for both inclusion and exclusion. Women have been denied the full and effective title of citizen for much history, ancient and modern. Feminist offers three models of citizenship as solution to inequalities that have been established and maintained. First model is gender neutral citizenship, second is gender differentiated and the third model is gender pluralist citizenship.
Routledge, 2011
This collection responds to the need to re-evaluate the very important concept of citizenship in light of recent feminist debates. In contrast to the dominant universalizing concepts of citizenship, the volume argues that citizenship should be theorized on many different levels and in reference to diverse public and private contexts and experiences. The book seeks to demonstrate that the concept of citizenship needs to be understood from a gendered intersectional perspective and argues that, though it is often constructed in a universal way, it is not possible to interpret and indeed understand citizenship without situating it within a specific political, legal, cultural, social, and historical context.
Citizenship:Towards a feminist synthesis Ruth Lister
A synthesis of rights and participatory approaches to citizenship, linked through the notion of human agency, is proposed as the basis for a feminist theory of citizenship. Such a theory has to address citizenship's exclusionary power in relation to both nation-state 'outsiders' and 'insiders'. With regard to the former, the article argues that a feminist theory and politics of citizenship must embrace an internationalist agenda. With regard to the latter, it offers the concept of a 'differentiated universalism' as an attempt to reconcile the universalism which lies at the heart of citizenship with the demands of a politics of difference. Embracing also the reconstruction of the public-private dichotomy, citizenship, reconceptualized in this way, can, it is argued, provide us with an important theoretical and political tool.
Gender and citizenship: overview report
2004
For women and other marginalised groups inequality and exclusion have on the whole increased over the past decade. There is a growing realisation amongst those working in development that strategies based on economic models have for many people failed to bring about genuine positive change. This has led to the search for new ways of constructing programmes and approaches that look beyond economics and into the political social and cultural world. Looking at citizenship means looking at the people who make up a group community or nation and how they work within the group to guide the way it functions. Taking people’s activities roles and responsibilities as a starting point opens up new possibilities for addressing and indeed redressing the marginalisation of groups such as women. Citizenship is about membership of a group or community that confers rights and responsibilities as a result of such membership. It is both a status – or an identity - and a practice or process of relating ...