The Global Food Economy: The Battle for the Future of Farming - By Tony Weis (original) (raw)
Related papers
Book Review: The Future of Agriculture - A Comparison of Paradigms that Aim to Feed the World
Despite the fact that the world has the resources and technology to eradicate hunger and ensure long-term food security for all, the number of hungry reached a tragic apogee of 1.02 billion in 2009 (FAO, 2009a) . At the same time the International Association for the Study of Obesity estimated, that 1.7 billion people were overweight or obese (Lang and Heasman, 2004). Food policy is in crisis. Despite gigantic leaps in production over the past 100 years more people than ever in our history go hungry, while many others are suffering from ill health due to lacking quality in our food production system. Meanwhile an unprecedented and alarming destruction of our resource provider planet earth is advancing (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005). While the impacts of climate change will vary it is clear that action has to be taken, particularly in regions projected to experience severe ecological shifts (such as poor countries which will suffer earliest and most according to Stern, 2007). The following essay examines the three broad conceptual frameworks, concerning food policy and the food economy indentified in Tim Lang and Michael Heasman’s book: ‘Food Wars - The Global battle for Mouths, Minds and Market,’, while considering other authors perspectives and opinions. The current - the “Productionist” paradigm, as well as the two alternative frameworks - the “Ecologically Integrated” paradigm and the Life Sciences Integrated Paradigm (LSIP) – are examined and evaluated in regards of their suitability to ensure food security in developing countries.
Agriculture and Human Values
Agrifood scholars commonly adopt ‘a matter of fact way of speaking’ to talk about the extent of neoliberal rollout in the food sector and the viability of ‘alternatives’ to capitalist food initiatives. Over the past few decades this matter of fact stance has resulted in heated debate in agrifood scholarship on two distinct battlegrounds namely, the corporate food regime and the alternative food regime. In this paper I identify some of the limitations of speaking in a matter of fact way and of focusing on capitalist and neoliberal economies as the yardstick by which to assess all food economy initiatives. Using stories of bananas in Australia and the Philippines I advocate for a new mode of critical inquiry in food scholarship that focuses on matters of concern. Following Bruno Latour I use the term critical inquiry to refer to research methods and thinking practices that multiply possible ways of being and acting in the world. The new mode of critical inquiry I propose centres on enacting three broad research matters of concern. These are (1) gathering and assembling economic diversity (2) human actancy and (3) nonhuman actancy. I argue that through becoming critical minds in the Latourian sense researchers can play a key role in enacting economic food futures in the Anthropocene.
Food and Sustainable Development: How should we feed the world?
This chapter explores a number of issues connecting food and sustainable development. It highlights some of the ways the dominant twentieth century paradigm, productivism, exerts particular pressure upon resources and squeezes the entitlements of the poor. An alternative approach informed by sustainability not only works with nature but supports the claims of farmers and citizens to recover their rights to feed themselves. Nevertheless, meat remains a difficult issue to resolve given its enormous environmental impact yet with universal expectations around consumption.
Agroecology: Science and Politics
Agrarian Change & peasant Studies, 2017
This is a timely and excellent book by two world leaders of agroecological thought and practice. In this highly readable book, Peter Rosset and Miguel Altieri offer a clear analysis of the principles of agroecology and its potential to address major social, economic and environmental challenges of food and farming in the 21st century. Most notably, the book demonstrates the importance of social organization, peasant agroecology schools and social movements for bringing agroecology to scale. By focusing on the contested nature of the science of agroecology and its contemporary politics, the authors invite the reader to embrace an agroecology that transforms rather than conforms with the dominant agri-food regime. A stimulating read! Michel Pimbert, Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience, Coventry University Agroecology: Science and Politics by Peter Rosset and Miguel Altieri will be an important book that does an excellent job at summarizing what agroecology is as a science, a practice and a movement, as well as the debates that are currently going on regarding agroecology. Ivette Perfecto, George W. Pack Professor of Natural Resources, University of Michigan This small book has a very important message for the agroecology movement as well as for each of us as agroecologists. The scientific basis of agroecology and how agroecology confronts the industrial agriculture model is now broadly accepted, but how this approach can overcome the political and economic power of this model is much more controversial. This book clearly and forcefully states that agroecology must also address the politics of the food system, who has power and control, and how what might be called political agroecology must be included so that deep change can occur. We must heed this call to action! Steve Gliessman, Professor Emeritus of Agroecology, UC Santa Cruz, author of Agroecology: The Ecology of Sustainable Food Systems