Valuing the Future: Should Educational Benefits be Discounted (original) (raw)
2015, Oxford Review of Education (2015), forthcoming
The practice of assigning a lesser value to benefits the further they are into the future, or, in economic terms, discounting, has long played a significant role in shaping public policy. Recently, due to the growing influence of economic modes of thinking on the educational realm, the concept of discounting is also starting to have an influence on the way in which the future is dealt with in educational policymaking. While in other fields, such as health and environmental protection, much has been written about discounting and its far-reaching policy implications, little attention has been given to the subject in the educational domain. The purpose of this article is to discuss critically the role that discounting should play in the educational realm. The article provides a normative stance on the issue by examining the various justifications for discounting and assessing them in light of education’s special characteristics. It concludes that in education we should not rely on a single discount rate, and that certain educational benefits should either not be discounted at all or discounted using a very low rate.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research.
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
Discounting the future, yet again
Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 2007
The question of `discounting the future' is one on which philosophers and economists have divergent professional views. There is a lot of talking at cross-purposes across the disciplinary divide here; but there is a fair bit of confusion (I think) within disciplines as well. My aim here is essentially clarificatory. I draw several distinctions that I see as significant: • between inter-temporal and intergenerational questions • between price (discount rate) and quantity (inter-temporal and intergenerational allocations) as the ethically relevant magnitude, and • between price change and preference change as the primary instrument of change. I show that discounting does not violate the principle of inter-temporal and intergenerational neutrality, but I also cast some doubt on whether making adequate allowance for future generations has really been the problem that economists and philosophers seem to have taken it to be.
The Economics of Education as Educational Science
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014
This paper aims to examine the immaturity of the economics of education as an educational science brought about by its focus solely on the individual and social benefits of education. Currently, the economics of education does not demonstrate the capacity to propose solutions to educational problems that are effective, efficient , socially workable and economically viable. As a result, the economics of education will only be considered an educational science when it is able to produce solutions to the ineffectiveness and inefficiency of the systems of education. The paper argues that this could be done through the introduction of pedagogy to educational projects.
The Behavioral Economics of Education : New Directions for Research
Over the past several decades, researchers have used economics to understand a number of issues in education policy. This article argues that some education researchers have defined economics too narrowly, neglecting several areas of economics research that cut across disciplinary boundaries. One subdiscipline of economics that might be of use in education, but which has not been applied much to it, is behavioral economics, which incorporates psychological knowledge about human behavior to enhance and extend economic models of decision making. This article reviews some of the behavioral concepts in economics that are most likely to inform education research and policy-prospect theory, framing effects, status quo bias, paradox of choice, and intrinsic motivation-and suggests directions for further research.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.