International Model United Nations on the Internet Governance Paradigm (original) (raw)
Related papers
Internet Governance and International Law: Structure, Principles and Norms of a New Regime
World has witnessed a new technological revolution in the form of internet especially in the latter half of the last century. Internet is a worldwide system of interconnected computers used for communication purposes. It has enabled millions of people throughout the world to communicate and interact with one another without regard to space and time limitations. Internet, as such, has removed constraints of space, time and distance. It has transcended conventional tangible boundaries. Internet can be said to be a information superhighway, a virtual library, a river or a global village. Internet has always posed a great challenge to law making and law enforcing authorities. Many areas of law, including, intellectual property, constitutional, commercial and criminal law have been particularly affected in varying degrees by the internet. The main problem relating to internet is that there is no central law governing the internet because there’s no central policy-making body that enforces internet decisions. This creates problems on such issues as jurisdiction, criminal law, evidence, privacy and even human rights. However, the most important aspect from public law standpoint has been the efforts at the international level to construct an international regime for global internet governance. Many of the governments whose citizens are connected to internet have expressed concern about the problems the internet has created. They have attempted to take action against the Internet’s intrusion upon the moral and cultural sensibilities of their citizens. However, individual attempts at regulating a worldwide system seem futile. Most attempts to define new rules rely on the disintegrating concept of territory while ignoring the new network and technological borders that transcend national boundaries. Currently, due to lack of national boundaries on the Internet, the only adequate way for countries to assert any control over the internet seems to involve withdrawing or restricting access. In this backdrop, it is being widely felt that a new international agreement must be concluded which recognizes the complexity of networks and allows expansion of the information revolution while avoiding the problems present in the existing legal framework. A possible solution to some of the problems resulting from internet use would be the creation of an international convention for governing this new medium of communication. This paper discusses some of the problems inherent to the Internet and analyses current international legal norms that apply to the internet. It enumerates certain set of principles and norms that could provide the foundation for the new Internet governance regime. It also opines that best way forward would be to conclude a framework convention as an appropriate institutional mechanism for advancing such a regime in the initial stage of its formation.
2008
A variety of forums have been used to negotiate international regimes for information and communication technologies (ICTs). While much scholarly attention has been paid to ICANN and WSIS, these two forums are not necessarily the most important or authoritative. The G8 and the OECD, for example, are considerably more important overall for ICT regime creation and maintenance. The purpose of this paper to put research on ICT regimes on a sounder footing by surveying the literature and proposing a new agenda for research.
Internet Governance: Trends and realities. Part 2
Biznes-informatika, 2016
Internet Governance is one of the global governance issues that emerged at the end of the 1990s. As the Internet is taking on an important role in every aspect of our lives, it has been recognized that its governance needs to involve all stakeholders and institutions to allow global access, foster development and contribute to the global economy, education, information. Security and privacy concerns should also be addressed in the policy dialogues. This paper outlines the global nature of the Internet Governance. It argues that in addition to dialogues and negotiations formal approaches should be explored to handle global issues in a global way. In its conclusion a mechanism is proposed to address Internet related global public policy issues. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author in his private capacity and do not in any way represent the views of the UN Commission on Science and Technology for Development.
Internet Governance: Trends and realities. Part 1
Business Informatics
Internet Governance is one of the global governance issues that emerged at the end of the 1990s. As the Internet is taking on an important role in every aspect of our lives, it has been recognized that its governance needs to involve all stakeholders and institutions to allow global access, foster development and contribute to the global economy, education, information. Security and privacy concerns should also be addressed in the policy dialogues. This paper outlines the global nature of the Internet Governance. It argues that in addition to dialogues and negotiations formal approaches should be explored to handle global issues in a global way. In its conclusion a mechanism is proposed to address Internet related global public policy issues. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author in his private capacity and do not in any way represent the views of the UN Commission on Science and Technology for Development.
The crucial and contested global public good: principles and goals in global internet governance
Internet Policy Review, 2020
Demands for a more democratic, transparent and accountable management of the internet were strong when preparing for the World Summit on the Information Society Review (WSIS Review), held in 2015. Partly in response to criticism, the United States initiated a process for transferring responsibility for domain names from the United States to the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN). Increased accountability was among the key motivations for this change. ICANN practices what have subsequently been termed multi-stakeholder governance. This article finds that this form of governance is preferable to an intergovernmental governance model both in terms of transparency and accountability.
International Governance of the Internet: An Economic Analysis
Economic Affairs, 2003
ICANN currently determines which top level domains are available on the A-root server and so restricts the choices facing Internet users. Thus ICANN redistributes wealth and has become the focus of rent-seeking activities. Yet, despite my belief that the Internet will become substantially more regulated in the future, I am convinced that technology will trump the best efforts of regulators to "promote the public interest."