The Politics of Forgetting: Class Politics, State Power and the Restructuring of Urban Space in India (original) (raw)
Related papers
New Perspectives on Turkey
This article provides an overview of the way in which post-liberalization urban restructuring is determined by middle class imaginations and lifestyles in Kolkata, India. It charts how the conjunction between planning, politics and private investment made middle class hegemony in the new urban politics possible, and how the processes that have been set in motion create new spatializations according to class through exclusions and reformulate citizenship as social relationships are redefined in the language of markets.
Guardians of the Bourgeois City: Citizenship, Public Space, and Middle‐Class Activism in Mumbai1
City & Community, 2009
This article examines the new phenomenon of "citizens' groups" in contemporary Mumbai, India, whose activities are directed at making the city's public spaces more orderly. Recent scholarship on Mumbai's efforts to become a "global" city has pointed to the removal of poor populations as an instance of neoliberal governmentality as espoused by the Indian state following the "liberalization" of the economy in the early 1990s. However, in this case, it is these civil society organizations, not the state-whose functionaries in fact benefit from a certain element of unruliness on the streets-who are the agents of increased control over populations and of the rationalization of urban space. This article, based on fieldwork-based research, argues that the way in which citizens' groups exclude poor populations from the city is more complex than a straightforward deployment of neoliberalism, and is imbricated with transnational political economic arrangements in uneven and often inconsistent ways. In particular, this article explores how civic activists in these organizations envision their role in the city, and how their activism attempts to reconfigure the nature of citizenship. For instance, civic activists consider themselves to be the stewards of the city's streets and sidewalks, and wage their battles against what they consider unruly hawkers, a corrupt state, and a complacent middle-class public. Moreover, civic activists render street hawkers' political claims illegitimate by speaking on behalf of the abstract "citizen"of Mumbai, thus implying that hawkers' unions speak only on behalf of the vested interests of a single population. In this way, they mobilize a normative notion of civil society in order to exclude the vast segment of city residents who either sell or buy goods on the street. In doing so, the civic activists transform the discourse and practice of politics in the city, so that, ironically, while on one hand using the rhetoric of citizen participation, they in fact undermine the radically heterogeneous forms of democratic political participation the city offers.
HAU; Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 2020
This article explores the remaking of ideas of the "ordinary citizen" in India in the context of Hindu majoritarian politics and changing relationships between the state and private capital. Focusing on one of India's largest privately developed townships, DLF City, which adjoins Delhi, the article explores the ways in which activities by middle-and upper middle-class residents of DLF City produce new narratives of "ordinariness." Within them, socioeconomically privileged groups come to be represented as "the common people," contesting the postcolonial state's historical focus on the welfare of marginal populations. The article suggests that contemporary narratives of ordinariness in India require an understanding beyond its deployment in critical social science literature where it is posited as a politics of speaking truth to power. The appropriation of ordinariness by the privileged in the Indian context is part of a new politics of class, caste, and majoritarianism.
A Struggle Over Class and Space in an Indian City
Economic and Political Weekly, 2014
Through the struggle over the right of workers to stand at Jakhan Chowk, Dehradun, in which the authors and others were involved, one can understand many key issues around capital, urban space and exploitation of workers in urban India.
Hegemonic Aspirations: New Middle Class Politics and India's Democracy in Comparative Perspective
ABSTRACT: This article uses an analysis of the rise of India’s New Middle Class (NMC) to develop a class analytics of democratic politics in India. The article locates the politics of India’s democracy within the framework of comparative class analytics and integrates class analysis with the politics of caste, religion, and language. The article develops two central arguments. The first is that the dominant fraction of the middle class plays a central role in the politics of hegemony. These hegemonic politics are played out both as attempts to coordinate the interests of the dominant classes and to forge internal unity within the highly diverse fragments of the middle class. But rather than producing the classical pattern of liberal hegemony (in which the ruling bloc actively elicits the consent of subordinate classes) in India these projects have been marked by middle-class illiberalism, and most notably a distancing from lower classes. Second, we argue that the contours of the NMC can be grasped as a class-in-practice, that is, as a class defined by its politics and the everyday practices through which it reproduces its privileged position. Sociocultural inequalities such as caste and language are an integral part of the process of middle-class formation. We argue that the NMC is a tangible and significant phenomenon, but one whose boundaries are constantly being defined and tested. The hegemonic aspirations of the NMC have taken the form of a politics of reaction, blending market liberalism and political and social illiberalism.
Deprived Castes and Privileged Politics: An Urban Informal Market in Contemporary India
This article examines political mobilisation around scheduled caste identity by focusing on a case study of purportedly “environmentally-beneficial” legislation, which threatened the existence of the informal sector recycling industry in Delhi. It explores the democratic political avenues used by those whose business opportunities and livelihoods were at risk, based largely on market participation and caste identity, to resist this legislation. The research is based on interviews and informal discussions conducted over an extensive period of time spent in the neighbourhood of the wholesale plastic recycling market in north-west Delhi and amongst the “elite establishment” – government officials, primary plastic industry members and others. As it appears, not only is caste identity thriving in the urban sphere, but this identity is actually being used in innovative ways to gain and maintain collective access to economic and political power.
Citizens and 'Squatters': The Contested Subject of Public Policy in Neoliberal Mumbai
Ethics and Social Welfare, 2013
The vast majority of the urban poor in Mumbai live in dehumanizing physical and political conditions, living in public but only reluctantly recognized as being a part of ‘the public’. The difficulties that the urban poor experience in accessing public facilities such as sanitation and water for example, reproduces and amplifies their marginality. Being compelled to take care of their bodily functions in degrading and public ways, they come to be seen as sub-human and consequently reproduced as targets of violence. Drawing on Iris Young’s discussion of insurgent expressions of citizenship, this article examines the struggle waged by an alliance of pavement and slum dwellers to transform the way in which the state relates to its most impoverished urban citizens, and in so doing, to demonstrate an alternative conception of ‘the public’. The Alliance’s practice helps reveal the politics through which the subject of public policy is constructed in neoliberal India, as well as provide us an opportunity to consider how it might be transformed to create a more just society.