The Social Foundations of Latin America’s Recurrent Populism: Problems of Popular Sector Class Formation and Collective Action (original) (raw)

Abstract

The article is an attempt to offer a ‘bottom‐up’ explanation of political instability in Latin America by examining patterns of class formation in the region. It argues that the heterogeneous class structure characterizing the popular sectors creates collective action problems that historically have resulted in popular sector mobilization by populist elites, if not apathy or civil war. The possibility of an alternative basis for popular sector mobilization that is more favorable to democratic consolidation is explored on the basis of a neo‐Marxist interpretation of class formation. By incorporating variables dealing with the state and the nature of civil society that are not directly related to the relationship of individuals or groups to the means of production, an effort is made to outline the basis of a new popular sector collective identity which offers a totalizing synthesis of this social heterogeneity. Some of the implications of this are briefly discussed in a concluding sec...

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (101)

  1. Agurto, I., M. Canales and G. de la Maza (1985). Juventud chilena: razones y subversiones. Santiago: ECO-FOLICO-SEPADE.
  2. Altimir, O. (1994). 'Income distribution and poverty through the crisis and adjustment'. CEPAL Review 52(April) pp. 7-31.
  3. Altimir, O. (1995). Inequality, Employment and Poverty in Latin America: An Overview, Paper presented to the conference, 'Poverty in Latin America: Issues and New Responses,' Kellogg Institute for International Studies, University of Notre Dame, Sept. 30 -Oct. 1, 1995.
  4. Alvarez, S.E. (1990). Engendering Democracy in Brazil: Women's Movements in Transition Politics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  5. Baloyra-Herp, E. (1983). 'Reactionary Despotism in Central America'. Journal of Latin American Studies, 15(November) pp. 295-319.
  6. Baraona, J. M. (1974). 'La evolución del movimiento laboral,' in Dagmar Raczynski et al, Los actores de la realidad chilena, Santiago: Editorial del Pacifico S.A., pp. 101-171.
  7. Bartell, E. and L. Payne, eds. (1995). Business and Democracy in Latin America, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  8. Bitar, S. 1986 Chile: Experiment in Democracy, Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.
  9. Buchanan, P. (1997). 'Counterhegemonic Strategies in Neoliberal Argentina'. Latin American Perspectives, 24(November) pp. 113-132.
  10. Calderon, F., ed. (1986). Los movimientos sociales ante la crisis, Buenos Aires: Universidad de las Naciones Unidas.
  11. Canovan, M. (1981). Populism, New York: Harcourt Brace Janovitch.
  12. Cardoso, F. and E. Faletto (1979). Dependency and Development in Latin America, Berkeley: University of California Press.
  13. Cardoso, E. and A. Helwege 1991 'Populism, Profligacy, and Redistribution,' in R. Dornbusch and S. Edwards, eds., 1991. The Macroeconomics of Populism in Latin America, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 45-70.
  14. Cardoso, R. (1992). 'Popular Movements in the Context of the Consolidation of Democracy in Brazil,' in A. Escobar and S. Alvarez, eds., The Making of Social Movements in Latin America: Identity, Strategy, and Democracy, Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 291-302.
  15. Castells, M. (1983). The City and the Grassroots: A Cross-Cultural Theory of Urban Social Movements, Berkeley: University of California Press.
  16. Castro Rea, J., G. Ducatenzeiler and P. Faucher (1992). 'Back to Populism: Latin America's Alternative to Democracy,' in A. Ritter, M. Cameron and D. Pollock, eds., Latin America to the Year 2000: Reactivating Growth, Improving Equity, Sustaining Democracy, New York: Praeger.
  17. Comisión Economica para America Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL) (1989) Transformación Ocupacional y Crisis Social en America Latina, Santiago: United Nations.
  18. CEPAL (1991). Magnitud de la Pobreza en America Latina en los Años Ochenta, Santiago: Comisión Economica para America Latina y el Caribe and Programa de las Naciones Unidas Para el Desarrollo.
  19. CEPAL (1995). PANORAMA SOCIAL DE AMERICA LATINA. Santiago: Comisión Economica para America Latina y el Caribe and Programa de las Naciones Unidas Para el Desarrollo.
  20. CEPAL (1996). AMÉRICA LATINA Y EL CARIBE. 15 años de desempeño económico, Santiago: Comisión Economica para America Latina y el Caribe and Programa de las Naciones Unidas Para el Desarrollo. Latin America's Recurrent Populism
  21. Chalmers, D. (1977). 'The Politicized State in Latin America,' in James M. Malloy, ed., Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 23-45.
  22. Clark, T.N. and S.M. Lipset (1991). 'Are Social Classes Dying?' International Sociology, 6(December) pp. 397-410.
  23. Collier, D., (ed. 1979). The New Authoritarianism in Latin America, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  24. Collier, D. and R. Collier (1991). Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  25. Conniff, M. (1982a). 'Introduction: Toward a Comparative Definition of Populism,' in M. Conniff, ed., Latin American Populism in Comparative Perspective, Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
  26. Conniff, M., (ed. 1982b). Latin American Populism in Comparative Perspective, Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
  27. Cook, M.L. (1996). Organizing Dissent: Unions, the State, and the Democratic Teachers' Movement in Mexico, University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
  28. Davis, D. (1989). 'Book Review: Eckstein, Susan. Power and Popular Protest: Latin American Social Movements,' Journal of Inter-American Studies and World Affairs, 31(Winter) pp. 225-234.
  29. de la Torre, C. (1992). 'The Ambiguous Meanings of Latin American Populisms,' Social Research, 59(Summer) pp. 385-414.
  30. Di Tella, T. (1965). 'Populism and Reform in Latin America,' in C. Veliz, ed., Obstacles to Change in Latin America, London: Oxford University Press, pp. 47-74.
  31. Díaz, A. 1991 'Nuevas tendencias en la estructura social chilena. Asalarización informal y pobreza en los ochenta,' Proposiciones, no. 20: pp. 88-119.
  32. Dornbusch, R. and S. Edwards, (eds. 1991). The Macroeconomics of Populism in Latin America, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  33. Drake, P. (1978). Socialism and Populism in Chile, 1932-52, Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  34. Drake, P. (1982). 'Populism in South America,' Latin American Research Review, XVII(1) pp. 190-199.
  35. Drake, P. (1991). 'Comment,' in R. Dornbusch and S. Edwards, eds., 1991. The Macroeconomics of Populism in Latin America, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 35-40.
  36. Drake, P. (1996). Labor Movements and Dictatorships: The Southern Cone in Comparative Perspective, Baltimore: the Johns Hopkins University Press.
  37. Dresser, D. (1994). 'Bringing the Poor Back In: National Solidarity as a Strategy for Regime Legitimation,' in W. Cornelius, A. Craig and J. Fox, eds., Transforming State-Society Relations in Mexico: The National Solidarity Strategy, San Diego: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, pp. 143-165.
  38. Eckstein, Susan (1988). The Poverty of Revolution: The State and the Urban Poor in Mexico, 2nd ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  39. Eckstein, S., (ed. 1989). Power and Popular Protest: Latin American Social Movements, Berkeley: University of California Press.
  40. Escobar, A. and S. Alvarez, (eds. 1992). The Making of Social Movements in Latin America: Identity, Strategy and Democracy, Boulder: Westview.
  41. Evers, T. (1985). 'Identity: the Hidden Side of New Social Movements in Latin America,' in D. Slater, ed., New Social Movements and the State in Latin America, Amsterdam: CEDLA, pp. 43-71.
  42. Fajnzylber, F. (1990). Unavoidable Industrial Restructuring in Latin America, Durham: Duke University Press.
  43. Faletto, E. and E. Ruiz (1970). 'Conflicto pol'tico y estructura social,' in An'bal Pinto et al, Chile, hoy, Mexico: Siglo Veintiuno Editores S.A., pp. 213-54.
  44. Foweraker, J. (1993). Popular Mobilization in Mexico: The Teachers' Movement 1977-87, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  45. Foweraker J. and A. L. Craig, (eds. 1990). Popular Movements and Political Change in Mexico, Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  46. Garretón, M.A. (1989). The Chilean Political Process, Boston: Allen & Unwin, Inc. Garretón, M.A. (1996). 'Social Movements and the Process of Democratization. A General Framework,' International Review of Sociology, 6(1) pp. 39-49.
  47. Gay, R. (1990). 'Popular incorporation and prospects for democracy: Some Implications of the Brazilian case,' Theory and Society, 19 pp. 447-463.
  48. Gay, R. (1994). Popular Organization and Democracy in Rio de Janeiro: A Tale of Two Favelas, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  49. Germani, G. (1978). Authoritarianism, Fascism, and National Populism, New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Books.
  50. Graham, C. (1992). Peru's APRA: Parties, Politics and the Elusive Quest for Democracy, Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  51. Hamilton, N. (1985). The Limits of State Autonomy: Post Revolutionary Mexico, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  52. Hirschman, A. (1981). 'The Rise and Decline of Development Economics,' in A. Hirschman, Essays in Trespassing: Economics to politics and beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-24.
  53. Huntington, S. (1968). Political Order in Changing Societies, New Haven: Yale University Press.
  54. Ianni, O. (1975). La formacion del estado populista en America Latina, Mexico: Ediciones Era.
  55. Iglesias, E. (1990). 'From Policy Consensus to Renewed Economic Growth,' in J. Williamson, ed., Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened? Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.
  56. Jacquette, J., (ed. 1989). The Women's Movement in Latin America: Feminism and the Transition to Democracy, Boston: Unwin Hyman.
  57. Jelin, E., (ed. 1990). Women and Social Change in Latin America, London: Zed Books, Ltd.
  58. Johnson, J.J. (1958). Political Change in Latin America: The emergence of the Middle Sectors, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  59. Karl, T. (1990). 'Dilemmas of Democratization in Latin America.' Comparative Politics, 23(October) pp. 1-21.
  60. Karl, T. (1992). 'El Salvador's Negotiated Revolution.' Foreign Affairs, 71(Spring) pp. 147-164.
  61. Katznelson, I. (1986). 'Working-Class Formation: Constructing Cases and Comparisons,' in I. Katznelson and A. Zolberg, eds., Working-Class Formation: Nineteenth-Century Patterns in Western Europe and the United States, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  62. Kurth, J. (1979). 'Industrial Change and Political Change: A European Perspective,' in D. Collier, ed., The New Authoritarianism in Latin America, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  63. Laclau, E. (1979). Politics and Ideology: Capitalism, Fascism and Populism, London: Verso.
  64. Laclau, E. (1993) 'The Signifiers of Democracy,' in J. Carens, ed., Democracy and Possessive Individualism: The Intellectual Legacy of C.B. Macperson, Albany: State University of New York Press pp. 221-233.
  65. Latin America's Recurrent Populism
  66. Mansbridge, J. (1980). Beyond Adversary Democracy, New York: Basic Books.
  67. Mesa-Lago, C. (1978). Social Security in Latin America: Pressure Groups, Stratification and Inequality, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  68. Mesa-Lago, C. (1989). Ascent to Bankruptcy: Financing Social Security in Latin America, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  69. Mouzelis, N. (1985). 'On the Concept of Populism: Populist and Clientelist Modes of Incorporation in Semiperipheral Polities,' Politics and Society, 14(3) pp. 329-348.
  70. Murillo, M.V. (1997). 'Union Politics, Market-Oriented Reforms, and the Reshaping of Argentine Corporatism,' in D. Chalmers, C. Vilas, K. Hite, S. Martin, K. Piester and M. Segarra, eds., The New Politics of Inequality in Latin America: Rethinking Participation and Representation, Oxford: Oxford University Press pp. 72-94.
  71. O'Donnell, G. (1973). Modernization and Bureaucratic Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics, Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California, Berkeley.
  72. Oficina Internaciónal del Trabajo (OIT) (1993). EL TRABAJO EN EL MUNDO 1993, Geneva: Oficina Internaciónal del Trabajo.
  73. Oxhorn, P. (1995a). Organizing Civil Society: Popular Organizations and the Struggle for Democracy in Chile, University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
  74. Oxhorn, Philip (1995b). 'From Controlled Inclusion to Coerced Marginalization: The Struggle for Civil Society in Latin America,' in J. Hall, ed., Civil Society: Theory, History and Comparison, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 250-277.
  75. Oxhorn, P. (1996a). Neoliberal Economic Reform and the Disarticulation of Civil Society In Latin America, Montreal: Department of Political Science, McGill University, mimeo.
  76. Oxhorn, P. (1996b). 'Surviving the Return to "Normalcy": Social Movements, Democratic Consolidation and Economic Restructuring,' International Review of Sociology, 6(1): 117-134.
  77. Oxhorn, P. and G. Ducatenzeiler (1998). 'The Problematic Relationship between Economic and Political Liberalization: Some Theoretical Considerations,' in P. Oxhorn and P. Starr, eds., The Market and Democracy In Latin America: Convergence or Divergence? Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
  78. Pinto, A. (1970). 'Desarrollo económico y relaciones sociales,' in An'bal Pinto et al, Chile, hoy. Mexico: Siglo Veintiuno Editores S.A., pp. 5-52.
  79. Portes, A. (1985). 'Latin American Class Structures: Their Composition and Change during the Last Decades," Latin American Research Review, XX(3), pp. 7-39.
  80. Portes, A. (1989). 'Latin American Urbanization in the Years of the Crisis.' Latin American Research Review, XXIV(3), pp. 7-44.
  81. Portes, A. (1994). 'By-passing the rules: The dialectics of labour standards and informalization in less developed countries,' in N. Sensuberger and D. Cambell, eds., International Labor Standards and Economic Interdependence, Geneva: Institute for Labour Studies, pp. 159-176.
  82. Przeworski, A. (1985). Capitalism and Social Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  83. Roberts, K. (1995). 'Neoliberalism and the Transformation of Populism in Latin America: The Peruvian Case,'" World Politics, 48(October): pp. 82- 116.
  84. Rodrigues, I.J. (1995). 'The CUT: New Unionism at a Crossroads,' NACLA Report on the Americas, 28(May/June) pp. 30-34.
  85. Roxborough, I. (1984). 'Unity and Diversity in Latin American History.' Journal of Latin American Studies, 16(May).
  86. Rueschemeyer, D., E. Stephens and J. Stephens (1992). Capitalist Development and Democracy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  87. Rustow, D. (1970). 'Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model,' Comparative Politics, 2(April) pp. 337-363.
  88. Schneider, C. (1995). Shantytown Protest in Pinochet's Chile, Philadephia: Temple University Press.
  89. Slater, D., (ed. 1985). New Social Movements and the State in Latin America, (Amsterdam: CEDLA).
  90. Stein, S. (1980). Populism in Peru : The Emergence of the Masses and the Politics of Social Control, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
  91. Stepan, Alfred, (ed. 1978). Democratizing Brazil, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  92. Stokes, S. (1995). Culture in Conflict: Social Movements and the State in Peru, Berkeley: University of California Press.
  93. Taguieff, P. (1995). Political Science Confronts Populism: From a Conceptual Mirage to a Real Problem.' Telos, (Spring) pp. 9-43.
  94. Valenzuela, E. (1984). La rebelión de los jovenes, Santiago: SUR.
  95. Waisman, C. (1987). The Reversal of Development in Argentina: Postwar Counterrevolutionary Policies and Their Structural Consequences, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  96. Weffort, F. (1978). O populismo na politica brasileira, Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.
  97. Weyland, K. (1996). 'Neopopulism and Neoliberalism in Latin America: Unexpected Affinities,' Studies in Comparative International Development, 31(Fall) pp. 3-31
  98. Wiarda, H. (1982). Politics and Social Change in Latin American: The Distinct Tradition, 2nd ed. University of Massachusetts Press.
  99. Wiarda, H. (1990). The Democratic Revolution in Latin America, New York: Holmes & Meier.
  100. Williamson, J. (1990). "The Progress of Policy Reform in Latin America,' in J. Williamson, ed., Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened? Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics, pp. 353-420.
  101. Zapata, F. (1998). 'Trade Unions and the Corporatist System in Mexico,' in P. Oxhorn and G. Ducatenzeiler, eds., What Kind of Democracy? What Kind of Market? Latin America in the Age of Neoliberalism, University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.