The Ambiguity of Violence in the Decade after 1968: A Memoir of "Gli anni di piombo (original) (raw)
Related papers
Modern Italy, 2012
The decade spanning from 1968 to 1980, known also as the anni di piombo, is among the most difficult and traumatic periods in Italian post-war history. One of the most memorable years of this decade was 1977, when a new student movement stood up against the established order. The so-called Movement of ’77 manifested itself among others in Bologna, where it had a predominantly creative and joyful character. Nevertheless, the protests were violently struck down when left-wing student Francesco Lorusso was killed by police forces during clashes, resulting in an urban guerriglia. This incident worsened the relationship between the historical left and younger generations of (more radical) left-wing activists, and marked the beginning of the end of the Movement of ’77. The chapter on 1977 was, however, never really closed, and a ‘counter-memory’ has continued to divide the local community ever since. In this article, we shall see how different memory communities in Bologna have dealt with this ‘collective trauma’, focusing on the former Movement of ’77 and the way it has used public commemorative rituals to rebuild a collective identity for itself in subsequent years.
The Wave of ’68. Portraits of Rebel Students in the Italian Press
2021
This paper investigates the representation of university students in the collective Italian imaginary during ’68 through the contemporary articles published in La Stampa and Stampa Sera describing the student uprisings at the University of Turin (Italy). The paper draws on a large amount of articles published in the daily newspapers La Stampa and Stampa Sera (nearly 400, from January to June 1968, the most dynamic phase of the protests) to highlight how journalists constructed the narrative of the rebellion by criticising the image of the rebel students, using words loaded with negative meanings and delegitimising their claims without any effort to understand their motivations. The image of the students that emerges from the articles over the period of time considered is negative, constructed to underline the destructive nature of the demonstrations against the political and social system of Italy in the 1960s. There was an unfailing tendency to highlight the rioting, disturbance of...
Carte Italiane, 2011
In 1977, a new Italian student movement arose which turned itself explicitly against traditional left-wing parties and unions. In the university town of Bologna, a student and sympathiser of a former left-wing, extra-parliamentary group - Francesco Lorusso - was shot dead by police during clashes, on 11 March 1977. Surprisingly, a group of left-wing intellectuals who engaged more directly with social problems, stood up against the ruling Communist Party and the way it had handled and interpreted the incidents of March 1977. In this article I discuss the controversial relationship between these intellectuals and the hegemonic powers in Bologna.
"Over the past few years European students have mobilized to oppose the cuts in the spending for higher education and to defend the public model of university. During such protests, all the different national movements have carried out a vast array of forms of action ranging from public assemblies and university occupation to traffic blockades and non-authorized demonstrations. This various and, to a certain extent, unconventional repertoire of contention has thus “travelled” across Europe, shared and employed by the English movement as well as by the Italian, Spanish, French, and German ones. In the course of mobilization, all these university movements have, moreover, modified their repertoires of action according to the institutional opportunities of their respective political contexts, their alliance structure, and their tradition of action strategies. This has been also the case of the recent protest campaign in Italy, known as the “Onda Anomala” mobilization, which has occurred to protest against the “Gelmini laws” in the span of time between 2008 and 2010. More specifically, this student campaign has been consisted of two distinct political phases of protest in correspondence with the two big peaks of mobilization, meaning the Autumn 2008 and the Autumn 2010. In the first protest wave (September – December 2008), large masses of students, in their first experience of political activism, have given birth to university assemblies, public teach-ins in city squares, and big and peaceful demonstrations. To put it shortly, the characterizing aspects of this phase of mobilization have been the high number of politically unskilled students and the adoption of a mostly conventional repertoire of action. In the second protest wave (October – December 2010), on the contrary, the student mobilization has undertaken a process of radicalization in the adoption of the action forms. In a lesser number yet equipped with a greater political experience, student protesters have, indeed, increased their level of antagonism vis-à-vis the Italian Government. My paper aims at investigating the causes of this process of radicalization in the repertoire of action. Which features of the Italian context and which movement characteristics have brought about the increase in the extent of disruptiveness of the mobilization? Social movement literature generally detects the radicalization of movements whenever the State increases its repressive practices and, at the same time, does not leave room to the movement activities. In other words, the process of radicalization is due to a high State repression and to a lack of political opportunities for the movement. Is it really always the case? Through this paper, I aim to challenge the classical explanations on the process of movement radicalization. In the Italian case, neither of these conditions have occurred. While the political opportunities have been maintained constant (center-right Government), there has not been any State repression. Why has the Onda Anomala increased its level of disruptiveness in 2010? My hypothesis challenges the standard explanation by arguing that it is precisely the absence of significant repressive activities and the lack of political opportunities to have determined this radicalization. In the presence of a low cost for mobilization (no repression) and any reason to lose political credibility in the negotiation with the Government (no opportunities), the students consciously decide to increase their level of antagonism by adopting a more disruptive repertoire of contention. Be radicals in this context is, indeed, extraordinarily beautiful! To test this hypothesis, I will conduct semi-structured interviews with the activists and the leaders of the Onda Anomala involved in the mobilizations of 2008 and 2010, respectively. "
Piazza2018 IRSR Not only students but also not enough the waves of protest in the higher educat
In time of economic crisis, since the 2008 credit crunch, many Western and European countries entered in the “age of austerity” characterized by the imposition of unprecedented large cuts in welfare state provision. Even the public education institutions have been affected by government policies characterized by budget cuts, neoliberal private-oriented reforms and increase in tuition fees for students. In reaction to this, in the following years, various global waves of protests have arisen in many countries all over the world. Differently from the past, not only students have promoted these mobilizations, although they are majority, but also the education systems workforce: from professors/teachers to permanent and precarious researchers, from temporary workers to technical- administrative employees. Although these mobilizations have had specific characteristics related to the national contexts, they have shared common aspects as the defence of public education and the refusal of the commercialization/marketization and privatization process. In this paper I focus on the mobilizations in the higher education system occurred in Italy. The most important waves of protests were in 2008-2010 against the budget cuts and the university neoliberal reform promoted by the former centre-right Education Minister Gelmini. If in the 2008, students and precarious workers mainly promoted the Anomalous Wave movement, so called for its unpredictability, in the 2010, beyond the students, the open-ended researchers were the main protagonists. Notwithstanding the mass participation and the sympathy of part of the public opinion, the reform and the cuts were approved and then, the mobilizations decreased and seemed to be completely finished. I argue that these mobilizations were unsuccessful not only because of the fragmentation of student organizations and because of the low salience of higher education in Italian public opinion, but also because protesters were not supported by most university staff and hindered by the academic authorities (deans and rectors).
Mapping the Terrain of Struggle: Autonomous Movements in 1970s Italy
The most recent capitalist offensive has sparked a vibrant new wave of struggles over the question of social reproduction. Water, housing, education, to name only a few, are now decisive sites of confrontation, and activists across the globe experiment with new tactics, forms of struggle, and models of organization. In some ways, our renewed focus on social reproduction shares interesting parallels with the “Italian Revolution” of 1968-1980, the most radical upheaval in postwar Western Europe. For while originally firmly anchored to the struggles of the factory proletariat, many movements began to wage a multitude of struggles beyond the point of production, developing class power on what was called the terrain of social reproduction.
Social movement theory and the Italian radical community archives: A question of valence?
The theory and practice of the radical community, and a capacity for self-organisation, demonstrates their ability to control the symbols and language of society, to define new conventions of meaning, and to offer alternative reasons and explanations for action. Invariably, however, the sociological study of Italian social movements of the 1960s and 1970s grant certain intellectual circles a monopoly over the comprehension of the ‘object’ of study. The wilful exclusion of potentially relevant theoretical practices in the sociological modelling of the nexus of the radical community and politics sweeps aside the localised actions and discourses of various subgroups within the social movement environment. That is, the assumptions in play in disciplinary thought treat the radical community as the material of the theorist, and disqualify the practice and theory of radical social movements as a credible mode of analysis of the social and political condition. Ultimately, this discounts the radical subject as knowledge producer. By reflecting on my personal experience of conducting doctoral research at three key archives in Italy—The Centre of Documentation in Pistoia, the Archives of Primo Moroni hosted by the Cox 18 social centre in Milan, and the Workers’ Archives of Augusto Finzi managed by the Marghera Public Library—I contemplate an alternative approach, which considers the valence of these communities as essentially epistemological and not simply ‘political’, or social. I then discuss how access to knowledge, in particular the refusal of the exclusion from knowledge creation, is a central concern for the radical political subject. To finish, I briefly consider how the holdings of each archive, along with their unique approach to governance, may promote or diminish the epistemic value of radical social movements.
The "Social Factory" In Postwar Italian Radical Thought From Operaismo To Autonomia
2014
This dissertation examines the "social factory" as it developed conceptually within postwar Italian Autonomist Marxism. This concept is defined historically as an outgrowth of the critique of political economy that accompanied a rethinking of Marxism in postwar Italian working class political thought through the experience of Quaderni Rossi, which culminated in the theoretical and practical work of Potere Operaio, with fragments in the area of Autonomia. Historically, this dissertation locates the "social factory" as derivative of two figures: Raniero Panzieri and Mario Tronti, as well as two subsidiary movements that were articulated, separately, by Antonio Negri and Mariarosa Dalla Costa. Conceptually, the "social factory" is understood in two differing modes: as the result of capitalist accumulation and, the other, as the consequence of the increasing tertiarization of economic life. Both are problematic and unresolved within Italian workerist thought; Negri and Dalla Costa contribute to the discussion of a "social factory" critique of political economy in terms of extending the conceptualization of class and the understanding of social relations within advanced, post-Fordist capitalism. The idea of the "social factory" is understood historically to signify the relationship between capital and class, to understand the role of capital as an element of command within a particular, historical mode of production. In this regard, the development of operaismo is delineated in terms of the critique of political economy and its secondary concept: class composition. The history of a rather rich and varied political orientation constitutes the substantive matter of this work, with the conceptual apparatus forming the definitive characteristics of a distinct political movement: operaismo. In short, the "social factory" is explained historically through its articulation in v Quaderni Rossi, Classe Operaio, the student movement, the "hot autumn," Potere Operaio, and Autonomia. Between the early-1960s and the mid 1970s Italy was the country of class conflict. This dissertation tells a story of that historical moment as understood through the development of its main concept, the "social factory," as a critique of political economy. vi Acknowledgements In the course of a dissertation there are many people that deserve recognition. First and foremost is the late Marshall Berman. He was the first person I spoke to of this work and he gave me a characteristic and practical piece of advice: "would you rather do research at 42 nd and 5 th or live in Italy for consecutive summers?" The iconic citizen of New York City instructed me to go abroad, to Italy, to enjoy my dissertation experience. Thank you. My adviser Jack Jacobs: always a mentor-supportive, challenging, and enlightening; steadfast and encouraging. This work bears the imprint of both of their influences. To Joan Tronto, thank you for being part of the proposal defense and for supporting the initial development of this work. To the staff at Fondazione Giangiacomo Feltrinelli, who assisted my archival researchparticularly David Bidussa, Loretta Lanzi, Massimiliano Tarantino, and Alfredo Puttini-thank you for welcoming me with open arms and for patiently dealing with my particular demands. To the staff at the Biblioteca Centrale at Palazzo Sormani, thank you for the endless days of microfiche tape and assistance in periodical research. To the staff at Libreria Calusca a.k.a. Cox 18-while I lived in Porto Ticinese, thank you for the introduction to your rich historical and cultural archives, preserved in the face of state terror. Thanks to the Centro Sociale Leoncavallo-for the informal conversations over dinner, the personal connections, and intellectual dialogue that "liberated spaces" offer (and many others who nourished my spirit as a foreigner investigating Italian history and politics). I would like to thank the Graduate Center of the City University of New York for its material support, particularly the staff in the Mina Rees Library's Inter-Library Loan office who found and retreated the bulk of my initial secondary sources, but also to the administration who thought my work of enough interest to award me funding to conduct research and to write. Second to them is the staff at the New York Public Library's "Schwarzman Building" and "Science, Industry, and Business Library." Studying Italian political thought and history in New York City would have proved impossible without these institutions. I would like to individually acknowledge Professors Frances Fox Piven and Mary Gibson: the latter, for her commitment to students of Italian history and ideas; the former, for her unceasing support for students interested in working class studies and the social movements that they create. Lastly, thanks to my immediate family. Mom, thank you for your unquestioning support. Thanks to Rabab Elfiky for her support and encouragement at the culmination of this work. In a general sense, this work was made possible by the rich history of working class peoples who vii struggle, and have struggled, to attain a better life for themselves, outside the boundaries of the wageslavery offered to them by capital. I'm proud to have written this for my father. Thanks dad for being union and talking about your work-life. I have undoubtedly overlooked many people who in myriad ways contributed to this work (especially my professors from URI who, in my undergraduate years, were remarkable). To the Italians who constitute this history, I've tried my best to represent what I know of your struggles honestly and without discrimination. Yet, in standard fashion, all the errors within are my own. viii TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1: Working class politics from the Resistance to the Economic Miracle 12 CHAPTER 2: The crisis of 1956 and the birth of Autonomist Marxism: Raniero Panzieri and the origins of Quaderni Rossi 57 CHAPTER 3: The "social factory" and socialist revolution in the theoretical and political work of Quaderni Rossi 96 CHAPTER 4: Classe Operaia: The primacy of working class struggle and the organization of revolution CHAPTER 5: Students and revolutionary class politics: capitalist planning, the scholastic system, and student revolt CHAPTER 6: The "social factory" and workers' liberation from work: the "hot autumn" and working class revolution CHAPTER 7: The "social factory" and the question of "worker centrality" CONCLUSION WORKS CITED CHAPTER 1 WORKING CLASS POLITICS FROM THE RESISTANCE TO THE ECONOMIC MIRACLE …[it is] the principle of authority which must perforce be respected… Now the concept of workers' control threatens that principle of authority; it is the superior who must control the inferior, never the inferior who controls the superior.-Angelo Costa, Confindustria The committees of liberation are the authority of the people, the only legitimate and the only guardians of the interests and liberty of the people: they are as such the true foundation and the incoercible force of the new democracy.-Rodolfo Morandi, Italian Socialist Party …when we speak of the new party we intend, before everything else, a party which is capable of translating in its politics, in its organization, and in its daily activity, those profound changes that have occurred in the position of the working class with respect to the problems of the national life.-Palmiro Togliatti, Italian Communist Party 10 The Italian Socialist Party of Proletarian Unity existed from 1943-1947. During the 25 th Congress in January 1947 Giuseppe Saragat led a "right-wing" or social democratic faction that split the Psiup between his newly created Italian Socialist Workers' Party (PSLI) and the "leftwing" worker-centered politics of Nenni, Morandi, and Lelio Basso which formed the Italian Socialist Party (PSI) [Di Scala 1988, 47-65]. While the call to Marxism is becoming for the most part (from right to left) a cover for an ideological emptiness without precedent, and Leninism as an occasion to make citations, revolutionary theory needs to be constructed from the base, in praxis and in social analysis.-Danilo Montaldi, "Sociology of a Congress" CLASSE OPERAIA: THE PRIMACY OF WORKING CLASS STRUGGLE AND THE ORGANIZATION OF REVOLUTION We too have worked with a concept that puts capitalist development first, and workers second. This is a mistake. And now we have to turn the problem on its head, reverse the polarity, and start again from the beginning: and the beginning is the struggle of the working class. At the level of socially developed capital, capitalist development becomes subordinated to working class struggles; it follows behind them, and they set the pace to which the political mechanisms of capital's own reproduction must be tuned.-Mario Tronti, Lenin in England The political work of the class consists today essentially in keeping alive in the practice of every workers' struggle the strategic proposal of the conquest of power through the revolution. The organization and the revolution coincide in the same strategic moment. The organization is the revolution. To organize signifies tying together, in the struggle, the mass organizations internal to the factory, at a national and international level, unifying the struggle in time and in space-Padua Autonomia Operaia To realize an economically and politically stable society, with the active collaboration of the working class, is the legitimate dream of intelligent bourgeois politicians: if such a dream represents the highest plan of a communist party, more than a million workers strong, the conflict between a reformist strategy and revolutionary tactics becomes inevitable-Rita di Leo, Operai e Pci