Importance of the integrated test in the Down’s syndrome screening algorithm (original) (raw)

Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 1997

View PDFchevron_right

A prospective two years study of first trimester screening for Down syndrome

A. Daniilidis

Hippokratia, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

Advances in prenatal screening for Down syndrome: I. General principles and second trimester testing

Peter Benn

Clinica Chimica Acta, 2002

View PDFchevron_right

Evaluation of First Trimester Contingent Test for Down ’ S Syndrome Screening

Kusagradhi Ghosh

Journal of Evolution of medical and Dental Sciences, 2015

View PDFchevron_right

Retrospective audit of different antenatal screening policies for Down's syndrome in eight district general hospitals in one health region

David Howe

BMJ, 2002

View PDFchevron_right

Down syndrome maternal serum marker screening after 18 weeks of gestation: a countrywide study

Isabelle Czerkiewicz

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2013

View PDFchevron_right

Review article Advances in prenatal screening for Down syndrome: II first trimester testing, integrated testing, and future directions

Peter Benn

2002

View PDFchevron_right

Advances in prenatal screening for Down syndrome: II first trimester testing, integrated testing, and future directions

Peter Benn

2002

View PDFchevron_right

Maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome in the first trimester of pregnancy

Ettore Cariati

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1995

View PDFchevron_right

Maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome in early pregnancy

James Densem

BMJ, 1988

View PDFchevron_right

Combining first and second trimester markers for Down syndrome screening: Think twice

Kate Brameld

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

New Developments in Prenatal Screening for Down Syndrome

Robert Mooney

Pathology Patterns Reviews, 2003

View PDFchevron_right

Clinical first-trimester routine screening for Down syndrome in singleton pregnancies in northern Finland

Yrtti Valinen

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2007

View PDFchevron_right

Improved first-trimester Down syndrome screening performance by lowering the false-positive rate: a prospective study of 9941 low-risk women

Karin Sundberg

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2005

View PDFchevron_right

Antenatal screening for Down's syndrome in assisted reproductive pregnancies

Eli Dreazen

Human Reproduction Update, 1999

View PDFchevron_right

Evaluation of first trimester maternal serum and ultrasound screening for Down's syndrome in Eastern and Northern Finland

A. Perheentupa, Markku Ryynänen

European Journal of Human Genetics, 2001

View PDFchevron_right

Screening for Down's syndrome: effects, safety, and cost effectiveness of first and second trimester strategies Commentary: Results may not be widely applicable Authors' response

Stuart Logan

BMJ, 2001

View PDFchevron_right

Performance and Predictive Value of First Trimester Screening Markers for Down Syndrome in Iranian Pregnancies

Mostafa Akbariqomi

Journal of Family & Reproductive Health, 2018

View PDFchevron_right

PRENATAL SCREENING FOR FETAL ANEUPLOIDY, DOWN’S SYNDROME, WHO, WHOM, WHY & HOW?????

IP Innovative Publication Pvt. Ltd.

View PDFchevron_right

Evaluating first trimester maternal serum screening combinations for Down syndrome suitable for use with reflexive secondary screening via sequencing of cell free DNA: high detection with low rates of invasive procedures

Geralyn Messerlian

Prenatal Diagnosis, 2015

View PDFchevron_right

Is prenatal screening for Down syndrome needed in young pregnant women?

Rekha Dhamnaskar

International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 2016

View PDFchevron_right

Trade-offs in prenatal detection of Down syndrome.

Pedro Gallo

… journal of public …, 1998

View PDFchevron_right

Serum screening for Down's syndrome between 8 and 14 weeks of pregnancy

James Densem

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1996

View PDFchevron_right

Cost-effectiveness and accuracy of prenatal Down syndrome screening strategies: should the combined test continue to be widely used?

François Rousseau

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2011

View PDFchevron_right

Screening for Down syndrome based on maternal age or fetal nuchal translucency: a randomized controlled trial in 39 572 pregnancies

M. Kublickas, Peter Malcus

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2005

View PDFchevron_right

Optimal cut-offs for down syndrome contingent screening in a population of 10 156 pregnant women

Peter Benn

Prenatal Diagnosis, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

Prenatal Detection of Down Syndrome using Massively Parallel Sequencing (MPS): a rapid response statement from a committee on behalf of the Board of the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis, 24 October 2011

Peter Benn

Prenatal diagnosis, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

First-Trimester or Second-Trimester Screening, or Both, for Down's Syndrome

Mary D'Alton

New England Journal of Medicine, 2005

View PDFchevron_right

Increased time-to-pregnancy and first trimester Down's syndrome screening

Seppo Heinonen

Human Reproduction, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

Cross-trimester repeated measures testing for Down's syndrome screening: an assessment

Mary D'Alton

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 2010

View PDFchevron_right

Down syndrome screening in the United States in 2001 and 2007: a survey of maternal-fetal medicine specialists

Peter Benn

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

Importance of the integrated test in the Down’s syndrome screening algorithm (original) (raw)

Related papers