The Evolution of Serbian Foreign Policy under Vucic: Navigating between the European Union and Russia (original) (raw)
Related papers
Strategic (dis)orientation of Vucics Serbia: Reluctantly Moving West, Willingly Embracing the East
Strategic (dis)orientation of Vucics Serbia: Reluctantly Moving West, Willingly Embracing the East, 2024
During 2024, some domestic and foreign analysts intensified messages suggesting that Aleksandar Vučić, the President of Serbia, is steering Serbia toward the West and away from Russia. The key arguments were Serbia’s sale of ammunition to Ukraine, buying of Rafale warplanes from France, and allowing lithium extraction in Serbia to Anglo-Australian company Rio Tinto. However, the ad hoc concessions Vučić makes through private arrangements with certain Western countries to remain in power at all costs neither bring Serbia closer to the West nor distance it from Eastern autocracies. This paper provides thorough analysis of the Serbia's strategic positioning under Vucic.
The Impact of the Political System of the Republic of Serbia on Shaping Foreign Policy After 2012
Polish Political Science Review, 2024
Since 2012, the Republic of Serbia has been governed by the Serbian Progressive Party, and since 2017 its chairman has also been the president, who has full power in his hands. In the first years after taking power, this group implemented a policy that could have been surprising to public opinion, considering the fact that it separated from the Serbian Radical Party. The negotiations on Kosovo, which brought a number of agreements, the diplomatic offensive that created Serbia as a European partner and regional hegemon, dynamic progress in the EU accession process and the promotion of Western European values were the elements that noticeably exposed the change in the image of this country in relation to the previous decades. However, the second term of government began to fit into the pattern of the global phenomenon of populism, leading to the ruling group taking over the structures of the separation of powers and limiting democracy in the country. Subsequent general elections brought the strengthening of this party in the structures of the state, whose level of democracy was rated increasingly lower in international rankings. Moreover, the political system of Serbia itself began to be presented in scientific and expert analyses as an example of stabilitocracy. The aim of this topic is to analyse the specific power of President Aleksander Vučić and his party in relation to shaping the state’s multi-vector foreign policy.
For many years the Balkan region has been the scene of a collision of interests of great powers. Being one of the central links of the region, Serbia throughout its history has experienced multidirectional and often mutually exclusive influences of certain world powers. The end of XX and the beginning of XXI century became the turning point for the entire Balkansregion where all the countries chose the European perspective. However, for some of them the path to Europe has turned out to be fraught with incredible difficulties, often associated with the choice between a recognized membership in the modern world and the preservation of national dignity. For the Serbs this question turned out to be the key one. Based on the methods of phenomenology, behaviourism and comparative analysis, the Author of the article demonstrates that the most important factor in achieving the goals for Serbia is a competently conducted foreign policy. The subject of this article is the analysis of the features of Serbian foreign policy during the last five years, after a new political team came to power. Having comprehensively considered the foreign policy aspects, the Author concludes that for many countries Serbia is still a strategically important and attractive market in the region, the core of the Western Balkans area. With skilful manoeuvring between the interests of others and their own main foreign policy objectives, Serbian diplomacy could achieve more rapid, painless, and most importantly, more favourable terms of membership in the common European family.
Serbia and Its Foreign Policy Alignment after the War in Ukraine
EUROPEUM Brussels Office, 2023
The war in Ukraine has resulted in an increased demand for candidate countries to align with the EU common foreign and security policy (CFSP). Given its special partnership with Russia and internal political dynamics, Serbia’s alignment with the EU’s foreign policy declarations and restrictive measures significantly decreased in 2022. There is no real incentive for Serbia to harmonize its foreign policy with the EU, however, assistance from the EU to gradually reduce Belgrade’s dependency on Russia might be beneficial to trigger a higher degree of alignment in the long-run. This policy paper was produced within the Think Visegrad in Brussels Fellowship programme.
Serbia, the European Union and Chapter 31: At the Crossroads
Evropska unija i evropske integracije Republike Srbije, 2019
The author discusses and critically assesses the current situation and challenges in Serbia’s European Union accession process regarding Chapter 31, i.e. the obligation of aligning foreign policy with the EU. This is put into a wider context of the (non) existence of Serbia’s foreign policy strategy and the necessity of fulfilling different, often diverse and even competing foreign policy objectives.
2020
As an EU candidate country, Serbia has obligations to show its willingness to align with the Union's common positions and joint actions in the CFSP/CSDP, support its positions in international organizations, take part in EU military and civil missions, and impose sanctions and other restrictive EU measures. Explanatory and bilateral screening meetings between Serbia and the European Union in the area of the Common Foreign, Security and Defense Policy were held in 2014. However, the European Commission Screening Report for Chapter 31, which covers this area, has not yet been adopted. Meanwhile, relations between the European Union and the Russian Federation have been significantly damaged by the Ukrainian crisis, and mutual sanctions were imposed. In such a complex international environment, Serbia wants to demonstrate its commitment to European integration while trying not to disrupt traditionally good relations and political and economic cooperation with Russia. Apparently, the consequences of the changes in international relations on a global level have affected the process of Serbia's alignment with the EU in the area of the Common Foreign, Security, and Defense Policy. Unfortunately, if the current state of affairs persists, this could affect the overall integration process and Serbia's European perspective.
The article seeks to examine Serbia’s EU integration process in the context of EU-Russia relations in the Western Balkans. Serbia’s path to the EU has been long and problematic, with Serbia recovering from economic turmoil, difficulties in post-conflict reconstruction, the destructive floods of 2014, the refugee crisis of 2015, and strained relations with its Balkan neighbours. By applying Levitsky and Way’s theoretical framework that stresses the importance of an external actor in the democratization process (the importance of leverage and linkage vis-à-vis the democratizing state) and the analysis of linkages/leverage with counter-hegemonic states, we argue that in examining competing linkages/leverages, we must acknowledge the importance of the interplay between powerful actors as well. The events of 2014, which have led to a dramatic rift in EU-Russia relations, offered Serbia an opportunity to exit the “grey zone”, as defined by Thomas Carothers, as well as gave the EU the chance to deepen its influence in the Western Balkans.
Russian Vector in Serbian Politics: Impacts and Outcomes on Regional Relations
2020
The thesis of Russian malignant influence has been one of the key factors of the homogenization of the EU foreign policy since 2014. Although it has been declared that full EU membership is Serbia's strategic goal, in this period, we are detecting Belgrade's intensive collaboration with Russia. The number of bilateral meetings has been increased, the number of interstate agreements has multiplied, military cooperation intensified, and public opinion towards Russia is more positive than negative (which can be seen in the results of opinion polls). Serbia is striving for the EU, but its foreign policy is not at all in line with the proclaimed foreign policy goals of the EU and other key European countries (Germany, France, the UK). To some extent, it can even be stated that Serbia remains the last 'island of Russophilia' west of the border of Belarus. The question is: why? This article first analyzes the historical and political reasons for strengthening Russian influence in Serbia, as well as Serbia's interests to work more closely with Russia, regardless of the EU. Then, the 'character of the Russian vector' on Serbian politics will be examined-its political, economic, and military dimension. The third part of the paper seeks to answer the question: how will it affect regional relations? The fourth part is the concluding considerations.
2013
This study examines the problems of Serbia’s foreign policy from 2008–2012, as evaluated on three points: its lack of long-term strategy; the malfunctioning of its system of decision-making and supervision; and the problems of its process of harmonization with the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy. The main purpose of this study is to offer a set of recommendations for reforming the approach to these questions, derived from an in-depth examination of the mentioned foreign policy aspects with the aim of bolstering the nation’s political standing abroad./vaj dokument razmatra probleme iz domena spoljne politike Srbije u periodu 2008-2012. godine, sa tri aspekta: nedostatka dugoročne spoljnopolitičke strategije, zatim funkcionisanja sistema donošenja spoljnopolitičkih odluka i kontrole tog procesa, i konačno procesa usaglašavanja sa Zajedničkom spoljnom i bezbednosnom politikom Evropske unije. Glavni cilj studije je da na osnovu utemeljene analize prethodno navedenih aspekata spoljne politike pruži set preporuka za reformu pristupa ovim pitanjima, sa ciljem popravljanja spoljnopolitičkog položaja zemlje.
Serbia on a crossroad between European Union and Russia
This article is focused on Serbian positions toward EU and Russia. The aim of the article is to provide an analysis that clearly and critical examine how much Serbia will gain or lose by taking one side, while rejecting the other. For that purpose, will be observed both processes: the process of Serbian accession to EU, and the process of moving to Russia at the same time. Paper will not take into consideration some subjective aspect, like, why Serbia chose particular solution, instead of other etc; or what is more correct to choose.