On going (and getting) nowhere with our words: New skepticism about the philosophical method of cases (original) (raw)

Philosophical Psychology, 2015

Abstract

The philosophical “method of cases” has been the subject of intense discussion. In a recent paper, Frank Jackson attempts to vindicate the method by proposing that it is underwritten by the “representational view of language.” Jackson's proposal is potentially very significant. For if it is true, then the method of cases stands, but quite possibly also falls, with the representational view of language as characterized by Jackson. The aim of this paper is to question the philosophical method of cases by showing that it does in fact presuppose a particular view of language that is at the very least questionable, both philosophically and empirically.

Avner Baz hasn't uploaded this paper.

Let Avner know you want this paper to be uploaded.

Ask for this paper to be uploaded.