Le Turkestan Russe: Une colonie comme les autres? ed. by Svetlana Gorshenina, Sergei Abashin (original) (raw)
Related papers
Russian Rule in Turkestan and the Example of British India ca1865 - 1917
Slavonic & East European Review, 2006
This article argues that Russia's Empire in Central Asia is best understood in comparison with the other Western Colonial Empires of the nineteenth century, specifically Britain's Indian Empire. It examines nineteenth-century Russian travellers' accounts of British India, and the `Asianist' tradition which argued that Russians had a greater affinity with Asian peoples than other Europeans, and that the nature of their empire was consequently different. In the case of Turkestan it rejects this assumption on the basis of research in Russian and Uzbek archives, and of the differing views expressed in books and journals by Russian military officers and imperial administrators of the day.
Peasant Settlers and the Civilizing Mission in Russian Turkestan, 1865-1917.
Journal of Imperial & Commonwealth History Vol.43 No.3 (2015) pp.387 - 417, 2014
This article provides an introduction to one of the lesser-known examples of European settler colonialism, the settlement of European (mainly Russian and Ukrainian) peasants in Southern Central Asia (Turkestan) in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. It establishes the legal background and demographic impact of peasant settlement, and the role played by the state in organising and encouraging it. It explores official attitudes towards the settlers (which were often very negative), and their relations with the local Kazakh and Kyrgyz population. The article adopts a comparative framework, looking at Turkestan alongside Algeria and Southern Africa, and seeking to establish whether paradigms developed in the study of other settler societies (such as the ‘poor white’) are of any relevance in understanding Slavic peasant settlement in Turkestan. It concludes that there are many close parallels with European settlement in other regions with large indigenous populations, but that racial ideology played a much less important role in the Russian case compared to religious divisions and fears of cultural backsliding. This did not prevent relations between settlers and the ‘native’ population deteriorating markedly in the years before the First World War, resulting in large-scale rebellion in 1916.
Rewriting the “Nation”: Turkmen literacy, language, and power, 1904-2004
2005
Language is politically invested, and a speech community's administration of its language and alphabet marks, constructs, defines, and expresses its identity. Among the Turkmen people of Central Asia, language policies and alphabet reforms have epitomized continuous efforts to build a national community in the contexts of the tsarist empire, Soviet rule, and independence. Through an examination of language policy, planning, and reform from the 1904 to 2000, my study contributes a new historical perspective on the formation of Turkmen identity; our knowledge more generally of the role of language in expressing and constructing self throughout the exigencies of various political eras;
The concept of “civilizing mission” served as the main legitimizing tool for Russian rule in its Central Asian province of Turkestan. As this paper shows, most representatives of the Tsarist Empire understood Civilization as the advance of Russian culture, so that the semantic fields of “Civilization” and “Russification” overlapped in Russian discourse on Central Asia. Especially during the 1880s and 1890s, Tsarist ideologists identified Civilization with long-term cultural, linguistic and even religious Russification of Central Asia’s Muslim population. Even though the colonial administration largely refrained from deliberate interventions into local life and thus from any actual politics of Russification or Christianization, Tsarist ideologists interpreted the concept of “civilizing mission” as an argument for national and religious homogenization. However, after the Andijan uprising in 1898, such hopes proved to be unrealistic, so that most colonial officials contented themselves with securing mere political loyalty of the native population.
On the Development of Turkestan's National Wealth During the Colonial Period of Code Russia
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF LIFE SAFETY AND STABILITY (EJLSS) ISSN 2660-9630, 2022
This article discusses the fact that manuscripts and other cultural relics, which have been carefully preserved by the people for centuries, were acquired by tsarist Russia during the occupation of Turkestan by Russian troops, imperial government officials, and orient lists specially sent to the country.
The Journal of history, 2020
With the strengthening of the colonial system in the Turkestan region, the tsarist administrationtightened control over the Turkic-Muslim peoples of the region. At the end of the 19th century andespecially at the beginning of the 20th century, new-method schools were opened in Turkestan, whichlater became the founders of the idea of unity of the Turkic peoples. According to intelligence information,during the study period, citizens of the Ottoman state were actively involved in the regionand were subjected to political persecution. The imperial administration promptly studied the scaleof the propaganda work of Turkish agents in the region, the degree to which the ideas of Turkismand Islamism penetrated into the consciousness of the indigenous Turkic-Muslim population. Fromthe information provided by the agents, it follows that after the Young Turk revolution in Turkestangovernorship, the Bukhara emirate and the Khiva khanate, the work of Turkish residents aimed at anti-Russian propa...