The medical office of the 21st century (MOXXI): effectiveness of computerized decision-making support in reducing inappropriate prescribing in primary care (original) (raw)

2003, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne

Abstract

Adverse drug-related events are common in the elderly, and inappropriate prescribing is a preventable risk factor. Our objective was to determine whether inappropriate prescribing could be reduced when primary care physicians had computer-based access to information on all prescriptions dispensed and automated alerts for potential prescribing problems. We randomly assigned 107 primary care physicians with at least 100 patients aged 66 years and older (total 12 560) to a group receiving computerized decision-making support (CDS) or a control group. Physicians in the CDS group had access to information on current and past prescriptions through a dedicated computer link to the provincial seniors' drug-insurance program. When any of 159 clinically relevant prescribing problems were identified by the CDS software, the physician received an alert that identified the nature of the problem, possible consequences and alternative therapy. The rate of initiation and discontinuation of pote...

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (50)

  1. Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA 1998;279:1200-5.
  2. Hallas J, Harvald B, Gram LF, Grodum E, Brosen K, Haghfelt T. Drug re- lated hospital admissions: the role of definitions and intensity of data collec- tion, and the possibility of prevention. J Intern Med 1990;228:83-90.
  3. Colt HG, Shapiro AP. Drug-induced illness as a cause for admission to a community hospital. J Am Geriatr Soc 1989;37:323-6.
  4. Ives TJ, Bentz EJ, Gwyther RE. Drug-related admissions to a family medi- Reducing inappropriate prescribing CMAJ • SEPT. 16, 2003; 169 (6) 555 cine inpatient service. Arch Intern Med 1987;147:1117-20.
  5. Jha A, Kuperman GJ, Rittenberg E, Teich JM, Bates DW. Identifying hospi- tal admissions due to adverse drug events using a computer-based monitor. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2001;10:113-9.
  6. Chan M, Nicklason F, Vial J. Adverse drug events as a cause of hospital ad- missions in the elderly. Intern Med J 2001;31:199-205.
  7. Cooper J. Adverse drug reaction-related hospitalizations of nursing facility patients: a 4-year study. South Med J 1999;92:485-90.
  8. Raschetti R, Morgutti M, Menniti-Ippolito F, Belisari A, Rossignoli A, Longhini P, et al. Suspected adverse drug events requiring emergency depart- ment visits or hospital admissions. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1999;54:959-63.
  9. Stanton L, Peterson G, Rumble R, Cooper G, Polack A. Drug-related admis- sions to an Australian hospital. J Clin Pharm Ther 1994;19:341-7.
  10. Hallas J, Worm J, Beck-Nielsen J, Gram LF, Grodum E, Damsbo N, et al. Drug related events and drug utilization in patients admitted to a geriatric hospital department. Dan Med Bull 1991;38:417-20.
  11. Bates DW, Leape LL, Petrycki S. Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events in hospitalized adults. J Gen Intern Med 1993;8:289-94.
  12. Leape LL, Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Cooper J, Demonaco HJ, Gallivan T, et al. Systems analysis of adverse drug events. JAMA 1995;274:35-43.
  13. Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Laird N, Peterson JA, Small SD, Servi D, et al. Inci- dence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. Implications for prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group. JAMA 1995;274:29-34.
  14. Lindley CM, Tully MP, Paramsothy V, Tallis RC. Inappropriate medication is a major cause of adverse drug reactions in elderly patients. Age Ageing 1992; 21:294-300.
  15. Schmader KE, Hanlon JT, Landsman PB, Samsa GP, Lewis IK, Weinberger M. Inappropriate prescribing and health outcomes in elderly veteran outpa- tients. Ann Pharmacother 1997;31:529-33.
  16. Lesar TS, Briceland L, Stein DS. Factors related to errors in medication pre- scribing. JAMA 1997;277:312-7.
  17. Ferguson JA. Patient age as a factor in drug prescribing practices. Can J Aging 1990;9:278-95.
  18. Tamblyn RM, McLeod PJ, Abrahamowicz M, Laprise R. Do too many cooks spoil the broth? Multiple physician involvement in medical management and inappropriate prescribing in the elderly. CMAJ 1996;154:1177-84.
  19. Bates DW, Leape L, Cullen DJ, Laird N, Peterson LA, Teich JM, et al. Ef- fect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on pre- vention of serious medication errors. JAMA 1998;280:1311-6.
  20. Hunt DL, Haynes B, Hanna SE, Smith K. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes. A systematic review. JAMA 1998;280:1339-46.
  21. Raschke RA, Gollihare B, Wunderlich TA, Guidry JR, Leibowitz AI, Peirce JC, et al. A computer alert system to prevent injury from adverse drug events. Development and evaluation in a community teaching hospital. JAMA 1998;280:1317-20.
  22. Bates DW. Using information technology to reduce rates of medication er- rors in hospitals. BMJ 2000;320:788-91.
  23. Pestotnik SL, Classen DC, Evans S, Burke JP. Implementing antibiotic prac- tice guidelines through computer-assisted decision support: clinical and finan- cial outcomes. Ann Intern Med 1996;124:884-90.
  24. Hershey CO, Porter DK, Breslau D, Cohen DI. Influence of simple comput- erized feedback on prescription charges in an ambulatory clinic. Med Care 1986;24:472-81.
  25. Gehlbach SH, Wilkinson WE, Hammond WE, Clapp NE, Finn AL, Taylor WJ, et al. Improving drug prescribing in a primary care practice. Med Care 1984;22:193-201.
  26. Rossi RA, Every NR. A computerized intervention to decrease the use of cal- cium channel blockers in hypertension. J Gen Intern Med 1997;12:672-8.
  27. Evans RS, Pestotnik SL, Classen DC, Clemmer TP, Weaver LK, Orme JF, et al. A computer-assisted management program for antibiotics and other anti- infective agents. N Engl J Med 1998;338:232-8.
  28. Poller L, Wright D, Rowlands M. Prospective comparative study of computer programs used for management of warfarin. J Clin Pathol 1993;46:299-303.
  29. Casner PR, Reilly R, Ho H. A randomized controlled trial of computerized pharmacokinetic theophylline dosing versus empiric physician dosing. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1993;53:684-90.
  30. Mungall DR, Anbe D, Forrester PL, Luoma T, Genovese R, Mahan J, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of the accuracy of computer-assisted versus GUSTO nomogram-directed heparin therapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1994;55:591-6.
  31. Walton R. Computer support for determining drug dose: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 1999;318:984-90.
  32. Fitzmaurice DA, Hobbs FD, Delaney BC, Wilson S, McManus R. Review of computerized decision support systems for oral anticoagulant management. Br J Haematol 1998;102:907-9.
  33. Régie de l'assurance-maladie du Québec. Statistiques annuelles. Quebec: The Régie; 1995. p. 46-8.
  34. Tamblyn RM, Lavoie G, Petrella L, Monette J. The use of prescription claims databases in pharmacoepidemiological research: the accuracy and com- prehensiveness of the prescription claims database in Quebec. J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48:999-1009.
  35. Hsieh FY. Sample size formulae for intervention studies with the cluster as unit of randomization. Stat Med 1988;8:1195-201.
  36. Tamblyn R, Abrahamowicz M, Brailovsky C, Grand'Maison P, Lescop J, Norcini J, et al. Association between licensing examination scores and resource use and quality of care in primary care practice. JAMA 1998;280:989-96.
  37. McLeod PJ, Huang AR, Tamblyn RM, Gayton DC. Defining inappropriate practices in prescribing for elderly people: a national consensus panel. CMAJ 1997;156:385-91.
  38. Liang KY, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 1986;73:13-22.
  39. Zeger SL, Liang KY. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics 1986;42:121-30.
  40. Tamblyn R, Laprise R, Hanley JA, Abrahamowicz M, Scott S, Mayo N, et al. Adverse events associated with prescription drug cost-sharing among poor and elderly persons. JAMA 2001;285:421-9.
  41. Demkjaer K, Johansen I, Bernstein K. Third generation electronic pharmacy communication. Recommendations based on ten years' experience. Stud Health Technol Inform 1999;68:278-82.
  42. Papshev D, Peterson AM. Electronic prescribing in ambulatory practice: promises, pitfalls, and potential solutions. Am J Managed Care 2001;7:725-36.
  43. Auber BA, Hamel G. Adoption of smart cards in the medical sector: the Canadian experience. Soc Sci Med 2001;53:879-94.
  44. Soumerai SB, Lipton HL. Computer-based drug-utilization review -risk, benefit, or boondoggle? N Engl J Med 19950;322:1641-4.
  45. Kroenke K, Pinholt EM. Reducing polypharmacy in the elderly. A controlled trial of physician feedback. J Am Geriatr Soc 1990;38:31-6.
  46. Hulscher ME, van Drenth BB, Mokkink HG, van der Wouden JC, Grol RP. Barriers to preventive care in general practice: the role of organizational and attitudinal factors. Br J Gen Pract 1997;47:711-4.
  47. Chase CR, Ashikaga T, Mazuzan JE Jr. Measurement of user performance and attitudes assists the initial design of a computer user display and orienta- tion method. J Clin Monit 1994;10:251-163.
  48. Kohlisch O, Kuhmann W. System response time and readiness for task execu- tion -the optimum duration of inter-task delays. Ergonomics 1997;40:265-80.
  49. Barber RE, Lucas HC Jr. System response time, operator productivity, and job satisfaction. Commun ACM 1983;26:972-86.
  50. Scaling the N-Tier architecture: Solaris infrastructure products and architecture. Software white papers. Santa Clara (CA): Sun Microsystems, Inc; 2002. p. 1-16. Available: www.sun.com/software/whitepapers/wp-ntier (accessed 2003 Mar 23).