PEACEKEEPING MODALITIES AND THE EUROPEAN UNION-UNITED NATIONS (EU-UN) COOPERATION IN CONFLICT MANAGEMENT: AN ANALYSIS (original) (raw)
Related papers
AN ANALYSIS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (EU) AND UNITED NATIONS (UN) COOPERATION IN PEACEKEEPING MISSIONS
The emerging partnership between the European Union (EU) and the United Nations (UN) in peacekeeping missions is clearly a desirable development. EU contributes to the UN peacekeeping missions by providing vital capabilities, especially in rapid redeployment while the UN confers legality and legitimacy to EU operations thereby enabling the Union to become fairly a global actor, not just in economical but also political terms. The EU’s commitments to UN peacekeeping missions complement its European Security and Defense Policy (ESDP). The study observes that the EU cooperates with UN in peacekeeping missions but its preference for participating in UN-mandated peacekeeping missions to UN-led operations has limited such cooperation.
UN-EU Cooperation in Peacekeeping: Challenges & Prospects
Partnerships between the United Nations (UN) and other International Organizations in the field of Peacekeeping have become a central feature of contemporary Global Security Governance. Since the early 2000s, the UN’s relationship with the European Union (EU) has developed as one of the most institutionalized partnerships of its kind. Yet, even though both organizations pursue similar objectives and seem –on first sight- like natural partners, a wide range of challenges and limitations currently hamper their effective cooperation. This GGI Analysis provides an in-depth analysis of the historical evolution of the UN-EU partnership, of the major elements of its institutionalisation as well as of the successes and tensions that have arisen from joint operations in the field. Examining also more recent cases of UN-EU cooperation, such as in the case of Kosovo and the Chad, the paper identifies major obstacles and challenges and offers several recommendations towards a more coherent and mutually reinforcing partnership.
The Practice and Patterns of EU Military Operations in Concert with the United Nations
Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 2016
In the light of the experience of European Union (EU) participation in collective international crisis management endeavours by military means in the last 10 years, certain discernible modalities can be observed and identified as patterns for operational arrangements between the EU and the United Nations (UN) in terms of objectives, mandates and functions. The reviewed range of cases illustrates the ways and means of EU security enterprises to reinforce, complement or substitute UN activities and capacities in acute crisis situations or in zones of chronic security threats. Some of the EU military operations were conducted for short periods of time (in 2003 and also in 2006) as direct assistance for the prolonged (though transformed) and largest UN peacekeeping engagement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The longest EU military presence (in Bosnia and Herzegovina since 2004) in a former conflict area demonstrates continuous regional stabilization efforts as an autonomous operation with a UN mandate. As another example of concerted EU and UN engagements, a military contingent under EU banner could be deployed in a critical area (Chad/Central African
The European Union’s Peace Missions in the United Nations Security Collective System
The recent and interesting practice of European Security and Defence Policy peace missions testifies to a great vitality of EU in the field of peace maintenance and international security. This is an asset, considering that the Common Foreign and Security Policy is traditionally considered the least effective of the three EU pillars. In this field of EU Law there is an aspect deserving attention, namely the international legal aspect of the EU competence in crisis management. In fact, the implementation of ESDP requires one to consider the role of EU in the United Nations collective security system, in order to identify the international legal basis of EU peace missions. This is not a simple task. The UN collective security system has the appearance of a patchwork obtained by stitching together legal and political ‘pieces’, and the presence of different sources can make more difficult to legally frame activities of international organizations for peace. Any attempt can seem like entering into a labyrinth, where the presence of many variables takes us down many paths with different exit-doors. The aim of this working paper is just to open all those exit-doors, trying to identify the most appropriate one.
This essay explores the motivations and causes that trigger member states of the European Union (EU) to participate in military conflict management operations and peace operations _ under the legal framework of the Union's Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP). More specifically, this essays investigates the relationship between the concurrent involvement of member states in non-EU peacekeeping operations and their participation in and contribution to EU military conflict management operations between 2003 and 2009.
A European return to United Nations peacekeeping? Opportunities, challenges and ways ahead
This introductory article outlines the main rationale of the Special Issue and places the topic of the so-called ‘European Return to United Nations Peacekeeping’ in the wider context of recent policy developments and conceptual discussions related to the literature on UN troop contributions. It then outlines some of the key findings of the nine case studies (Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Norway, Sweden, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom) included in this issue. The article concludes that despite a recent engagement of a group of European countries in the Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in Mali (MINUSMA), expectations of a large-scale ‘return of Europe’ to UN peacekeeping are premature. While the MINUSMA experience will certainly spark important discussions and developments related to the future of UN peacekeeping and Western contributions, European countries will continue to commit only selectively troops on a case-by-case basis and only if a wide range of facilitating factors align as much as they did in the Mali case.
EU Performance in Military Conflict Management
euce.org
The European Union is increasingly engaged in the management of violent conflicts beyond its own borders. From 2003 to 2010 the EU launched five military conflict management operations within the framework of its Common Security and Defence Policy. This paper examines the success of these oprations. To this end, the paper develops a definition and a set of criteria for success in military conflict management. It discusses what it means to militarily manage a violent conflict and deduces a set of theoretically grounded criteria for the evaluation of success in military conflict management operations. The paper subsequently applies this new theoretical framework in a empirical case study of the EU military operations undertaken to date to help manage conflicts in Macedonia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and most recently in Chad and the Central African Republic. Having examined their success, individually and comparatively, the paper goes on to explore the conditions under which EU military conflict management operations have been successful in the past in order to determine when and how such operations can be successful in the future. In this way, the paper provides the first theoretically-based comprehensive review of the EU’s role in military conflict management. It defines, evaluates, explains and predicts success in the EU's military involvement in conflict management worldwide. These findings are important not only to the analysis of the EU's foreign, security and defence policies, but also to the study of violent conflict and its managment more generally.