Marc Bompaire and Françoise Dumas, Numismatique médiévale: Monnaies et documents d'origine française. (L'Atelier du Médiéviste, 7.) Turnhout: Brepols, 2000. Paper. Pp. 687; 143 black-and-white figures and tables (original) (raw)
Related papers
Stroobants, Fran, and Christian Lauwers, eds. Detur Dignissimo. Studies in Honour of Johan Van Heesch. Brussels: Cercle d’études numismatiques – European Centre for Numismatic Studies, 2020., 2020
Le trésor de l'Acropole (IGCH 12) et le monnayage athénien Simone SCHEERS La série BN 10282 : considérations sur les hémistatères à la petite tête, imités du statère d'Hespérange Louis-Pol DELESTRÉE La problématique des ateliers monétaires gaulois Arnaud SUSPÈNE & Maryse BLET-LEMARQUAND Les monnaies d'or au nom et au portrait de T. Quinctius Flamininus : nouvelles données archéométriques et bilan des connaissances Clive STANNARD Apollo and the little man with the strigils, and the Italo-Baetican iconography Katherine GRUEL & Mattéo TANGHE Le portrait barbu des Riedones
Goths, Franks or Romans? New perspectives on an old problem in Late Antique numismatics
Journal of the Numismatic Association of Australia, 2019
Imperial authority is inextricably linked with Roman coinage. This association acts as a guarantee of quality and of its acceptance as currency. Imperial imagery and administrative codes function as mechanisms of accountability. After the last Western Roman Emperor was deposed around 476 AD, production of Imperial coinage continued. The production of Imperial coinage by barbarian kings is typically referred to as ‘imitation’. Does this term adequately describe minting practice in the 5th and 6th centuries? This article explores the limitations of this term and resolves an unresolved problem in Late Antique numismatics: the attribution of the •T• series tremisses. The implications of this attribution, and how it impacts our understanding of the period, is also discussed.
In 1998 Peter Ilisch published a group of Christiana religio coins of Louis the Pious (814–840) discovered near Paderborn in Saxony. This is the most common Carolingian coinage type, partly because it circulated for over forty years, partly because it was minted during an economic boom, and partly because the same type was struck at every mint across the empire. Although the coins are all of the same design, however, they are not identical: some, including Ilisch’s group, bear privy marks: additional pellets or other symbols. This article examines the use of privy marks on this coinage and considers their significance, in particular the extent to which they can help to attribute the coins. The groups discussed include those with a letter S beneath the temple; coins like Ilisch's attributable to a German mint, some incorporating a crescent below the temple; and Group X, with a remarkable variety of additional points and other marks, almost certainly expressing the die-cutter's sense of fun rather than any deeper meaning.
Review of Naismith et al., Early Medieval Monetary History
Medieval Review, 2015
The essays in this volume are dedicated to Mark Blackburn and seek to celebrate his scholarly legacy. As such, the contributions, while focused on medieval coinage and centered on the British Isles, are as much about the impact numismatics makes on wider issues in history and archaeology as well as the diverse geographies in which Blackburn researched. The editors have divided the collection into four main parts, corresponding to the honoree's primary areas of research. Parts 1-3 offer synthetic studies, integrating monetary history into broader debates about politics, economics, art, culture and daily life. Part 4, by contrast, concentrates on particular coin finds and demonstrates a variety of interpretive methods for this evidence.