Habits, Canvases, and Conversations: How I Think about Publishing (original) (raw)
Related papers
2019
This essay responds to an invitation by the editors of Sociologica to write about publication strategy.
Symposium: On Publication Strategies
Sociologica, 2019
As part of our efforts to be reflexive about the practice of sociology, we are publishing a series in which we invite a number of sociologists to contribute personal essays about a particular aspect of our craft. For this symposium we invited ten influential sociologists to write about their publication strategies.
Sociologia, 2019
This essay responds to an invitation by the editors of Sociologica to write about publication strategy.
Writing Ourselves in Sociology
Methodological Innovations online, 2007
What is the relationship between a writing innovation and a methodological one? When is the skill in the gathering of the data, and when is it in the telling? As sociologists, we are trained to think about our research techniques: we think carefully about how we gather our data. We are made to pay attention to every detail of the data gathering, whether we are doing large scale surveys; secondary analysis of existing data sets, or qualitative work of whatever sort. Our data gathering is subject to scrutiny by outside reviewers, in the form of Institutional Review Boards or Ethics Boards, which make sure that we are acting ethically in the gathering of our data.
Publishing studies: Critically mapping research in search of a discipline
Publishing Research Quarterly, 2007
The match between contemporary book publishing and academia would appear at first glance to be the most natural of alliances. No other subgroup of the general population is as likely to deal with publishers in the capacity of author, contributor or reviewer, and no other profession would appear as predisposed to bibliophily as the humanities academic. In the twenty-first-century research-intensive university, publishing quantum is the indisputable currency of hiring, promotion and grant decision-making, with books enshrined as the highest accredited research output for humanities scholars. Yet, until recent years, publishing has constituted the academy's medium for research dissemination rather than its explicit subject, 1 Over the last fifteen years or so, publishing courses have begun to multiply internationally in the post-secondary education sector, appearing first in the guise of vocationally-oriented certificate and diploma courses in institutes of further education, and only more recently (and tentatively) infiltrating the postgraduate coursework and doctoral programmes of internationally recognised research universities. 2 The research quantum imperatives of such institutions have combined with the pre-eminence of theory in the humanities over the last decades to exert pressure upon publishing studies. The field is currently experiencing a sense of urgency arising from both scholars and their institutions to reconfigure itself as a critical--rather than merely a descriptive or vocational--field) As so recent an entrant to academic environments on any terms, contemporary publishing studies may justifiably find this new demand that it generate a coherent theoretical paradigm and research methodology forthwith somewhat confronting.
Publishing in (and as) Practice
This one-day event looks at acts of publishing within contemporary art and curatorial practice. Guest contributors will draw on a rich variety of engagements, setting current practices against the alternative lineages of Pop and Conceptual Art. Presentations range from considerations of the various format and distribution strategies used by magazine editors and curators, to discussions of publishing, editorship and layout in (and as) practice.