Analytical Models of Competition with Implications for Marketing: Issues, Findings, and Outlook (original) (raw)
Related papers
Consumer Behavior and Competition-Factors of a Successful Marketing Strategy
Studies in Business and Economics
It is well known that the level of competition in an industry is a key determinant of the marketing strategy for the bidders participating in a market. On the other hand, the consumers’ reactions to the actions of organizations are an indicator to follow when defining the companies’ marketing strategies. The marketing approach to competition issues can be seen differently from an economic theory angle. Thus, while the economic theory argues that finding similar ways of acting is the key to securing a similar position on the market, the marketing theory emphasizes differentiation from competition, even an extreme differentiation from competition, which ensures a favorable positioning in the minds of consumers. This paper aims to explain the link between the level of competition on a market, an organization’s marketing strategy and consumer behavior, as a vector of response to the actions taken by the organization as a supplier, but also as a direct participant in the shaping of the c...
2001
The impact of a firm's strategic marketing mix choices on profitability can be evaluated by understanding the impact of those choices on consumer demand for the firm's products and on the firm's costs. Additionally, a firm's strategic marketing mix choices, and its demand and costs can be affected by rival firms' strategic choices. Therefore, to understand the effects of choice of marketing mix on profitability, we have to understand its effects on demand, cost and competitor reactions. The effects of choices of marketing mix on consumer demand have been analyzed in great depth in marketing, but research on the strategic reactions of competitors to such choices have been far more limited. The New Empirical Industrial Organization Ž . NEIO framework provides us with a source of methods that has potential to substantially add to our insights about competitive interactions among firms.
Managing the competition: Strategic insights and implication
European Management Journal, 1989
The discipline of marketing draws heavily on viewpoints, concepts and methodologies originating outside its own field of study. As a fairly mature discipline, it can contribute to the development of emerging areas of study as well as benefiting from the new perspectives such new areas bring to specific problems being studied by marketing researchers.
1998
Despite a great deal of theoretical research on competition, there has been limited empirical work assessing the type of competitive interaction that actually exists in the marketplace. The empirical work that has been conducted has suggested that there is significant variation in the type of competitive interaction across categories and across marketing instruments. Consequently, the central objective of this paper is descriptive in naturewhat does competition look like? Focusing on the competition that exists across strategic groups (Porter 1985), we categorize competitive interaction between private labels and national brands for each of 58 categories and four marketing instruments. Specifically, we look at five types of competitive interaction. Three, cooperative, non-cooperative, and independent (Nash) are symmetric in nature, while two, leader-follower (Stackelberg) and dominant/fringe-firm, are asymmetric.
A Consumer Behavior Approach to Modeling Monopolistic Competition
In this paper, we attempt to integrate research on consumer information processing and the consumer choice process with the goal of proposing a general framework for modeling consumer behavior in monopolistically competitive industries. Following a pattern of inductive reasoning, we posit a set of consumer behavior propositions that is consistent with observed results from context effects experiments and the phased decision-making literature. We propose that, faced with many competing brands in a monopolistically competitive environment, consumers can be said to construct consideration sets on the basis of non-compensatory rules and subsequently choose from among competing brands within a consideration set on the basis of compensatory rules. We identify five product-market characteristics that consumers use as heuristics to maximize the probability of making the optimal brand choice while minimizing the cost of acquiring and processing information about competing brands. We propose that consumers use memory and stimuli based information to evolve their unique perceptions of these productmarket characteristics. As a follow-up to our inductive approach, we show that the empirically documented context effects are consistent with our behavioral propositions. Finally, we use the propositions to explain several classic cases of consumer behavior observed in the beer, icecream, and automobile industries.
Using Attraction Models for Competitive Optimization: Pitfalls to avoid and Conditions to check
2006
An important contribution to understanding competition has been the development of market share models based on the relative attractiveness of brands within a competitive set. These models have been used extensively as statistical tools to analyze and represent demand data. They have also been used for analytical studies of competitive optimization but this entails a number of challenges for the researcher. Preliminary guidance to use attraction models for optimization is available when the competing firms make decisions about price alone. However, to be applied to a general marketing context, market share models with multiple marketing instruments need to be specified. Existing research has not considered either the robustness or suitability of market share models for optimization when each firm makes a costly marketing mix decision in addition to setting price. We highlight several problems that arise when specific forms of the attraction model are used for equilibrium analysis. The most important problem relates to whether solutions identified through numerical simulation are unique. Our objective is to explain the origin of these problems and then propose a methodology that avoids them. We propose an approach based on the multinomial logit model that allows an attraction model to be used for competitive optimization. By placing a number of restrictions on the exogenous parameters, a unique solution is guaranteed.
A reflection on analytical work in marketing: Three points of consensus
Marketing Letters, 2012
People make a wide variety of choices as consumers, managers, employers, and regulators. Most of these choices are not made in a vacuum but rather in a context of strategic interactions that make individual payoffs interdependent across the decision makers. This payoff interdependence leads to intertwined individual incentives, necessitating analysis of the entire system before one can predict and understand individual behavior. Analyzing such a complex system requires a precise mathematical framework to develop intuition and qualify theoretical predictions. A commonly used analytical framework is non-cooperative game theory.
The Theory of Multimarket Competition: A Synthesis and Implications for Marketing Strategy
Journal of Marketing, 1999
Multimarket competition refers to competitive situations in which the same firms compete against each other in multiple markets. The theory of multimarket competition suggests that the phenomenon of mutual forbearance may reduce the market-level intensity of competition between two firms when the multimarket contact between them (the number of markets in which they compete) increases. Mutual forbearance, a form of tacit collusion in which firms avoid competitive attacks against those rivals they meet in multiple markets, is proposed to occur because multimarket competition increases the familiarity between firms and their ability to deter each other. In this article, the authors examine how multimarket contact increases familiarity and deterrence. Furthermore, they provide an extension of the theory of multimarket competition by developing a conceptual model that identifies competitive and market factors that moderate the relationship between the degree of multimarket contact and the intensity of competition. The authors also examine the implications of multimarket competition for marketing strategy in the context of two marketing strategy issues: product line rivalry and entry strategy.
Competition as a Moderator of the Effect of Advertising on Sales
Journal of Marketing Research, 1984
HUBERT GATIGNON* the author investigates the impact of competition on the sales response function. In particular, the influence of advertising on consumers' price sensitivity (elasticity) is explored. Two opposing schools of thought, information theory and market power theory, explain how advertising changes consumer price elasticity. These two theories provide conflicting predictions of the direction of change in price sensitivity. The author proposes and estimates a model specifying conditions under which one of the two theories would apply. The impact of advertising on other parameters of the sales response function also is examined. The crucial determinant of the sign of these coefficients is competitive reactivity. An operational definition of this construct is proposed, and the hypotheses are tested empirically by an analysis of airline industry data. Competition as a Moderator of the Effect of Advertising on Sales To the marketer, one of the purposes of advertising is to make consumers less price sensitive. Presumably, advertising shifts a brand's sales response function by reducing the elasticity of price, thereby increasing brand sales and justifying what may be enormous expenditures for advertising. This straightforward argument, though reasonable on its face, has been challenged as a misleading oversimplification by strategists (e.g., Porter 1979) and economists (e.g., Ornstein 1977), who suggest that advertising can actually shift the sales response function in the wrong direction by making consumers more price sensitive rather than less. If so, large advertisers are frustrating their own purpose. Further, a firm may enter a cycle of raising ad expenditures to combat declining sales-which, unknown to management, accelerates the decline! This counterproductive effect may occur because of an often overlooked moderating variable-competitive reaction. Advertising outlays by one firm can provoke competitors to retaliate by raising their own ad budgets. Such reaction increases the overall level of advertising in the industry, exposing consumers to more messages
Marketing competition in the 21st century
International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2010
Marketing competition in the 21st century The new challenges that the 21st century brings to the field of marketing competition inspired the International Journal of Research in Marketing (IJRM) to sponsor a special section on the topic. This special section was preceded by a conference at the University of Mainz, cosponsored by IJRM, MSI, SMU (Singapore) and the University of Mainz.