Peleg-Barkat O., 2014. “Fit for a King: Architectural Décor in Judaea and Herod as Trendsetter,” Bulletin of the American School of Oriental Research 371, pp. 141−161. (original) (raw)
This paper pays close attention to architectural decoration in King Herod’s construction projects and offers a renewed perspective on Herod’s use of monumental display to situate his own kingdom within the empire. His increased reliance on the Corinthian rather than the Doric order, for example, appears to reflect Augustus’s choice of the Corinthian order as representing the new Roman taste. His introduction into local architecture of particularly Roman architectural elements, such as the stucco ceilings of the “coffer-style” and the console cornice, moreover, transformed the adornment of buildings throughout Judaea. The recently discovered mausoleum in Herodium identified by its excavators as Herod’s tomb exemplifies how these new Roman trends were incorporated into the local Hellenistic architectural tradition. I suggest that Herod’s decorative program influenced the tastes of many of his subjects; the architectural decoration in cities such as Jerusalem demonstrates how the innovations introduced by Herod to the local architecture were embraced by the upper-class citizens of those cities. In peripheral cities and smaller sites such as En-Gedi and Gamla, however, the architectural decoration maintains the local Hellenistic tradition. In these sites, the Doric order continues to be popular, and entablature elements are rare.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research.
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
BEYOND THE WALLS: LOCATING THE COMMON DENOMINATOR IN HEROD'S LANDSCAPE PALACES
2017
The Question of King Herod's personal involvement in the Building Projects attributed to him was always one of the more dominant topics in the study of Herodian archaeology. The purpose of this short paper is to try and answer this question by researching and discussing the location of a 'common denominator' in the structure of Herod's "Landscape" palaces, through the study of the relationship each palace has with its surroundings. These palaces-the Promontory Palace in Caesarea, the Third Palace in Jericho, the Northern Palace in Masada and the Palace of Great Herodium-were chosen as case studies for their scale, architectural complexity and the unique connection they share with the landscape. While a close study of the interior of the palaces and their structural units show that each palace plan is unique and shares almost nothing in common with the other plans, a research of the landscape in which the palaces are located indicates that a common denominator to all four palaces can be found in the forms of the elements of water and the dramatic landscape. These two elements, combined with the uniqueness of the structures themselves, point to Herod's own involvement in the planning of the four "Landscape" palaces .
Geometrical Planning in Monumental Herodian Architecture
Strata (BAIAS) 17, 67-76, 1999
This study demonstrates that geometrical planning on a large scale was one of the hallmarks of the building programme of Herod the Great. Never before had such a methodical approach to architectural design been practiced in Judaea. This phenomenon was a direct consequence of Herod's adoption as a client king of Rome and his policy of close cultural integration with the Imperial power. Other Roman influences are manifested at the same time time in building techniques (use of pozzulana concrete and walls lined in opus reticulatum) and modes of decoration (frescoes in so-called Pompeian styles and adoption of Roman mosaic and opus sectile designs).
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Related papers
2010