Application of the laser methane detector for measurements in freely grazing goats: impact on animals' behaviour and methane emissions (original) (raw)

Abstract

The laser methane detector (LMD) has been increasingly used in the last decade to assess the methane (CH 4) concentration in the exhaled air of ruminants. The CH 4 concentration was mostly measured indoors, where animals were either retained in a feed fence or manually by a person to facilitate the LMD measurements. By contrast, the use of the LMD for measurements under outdoor conditions has been limited to very few studies. The present study applied the LMD to assess the CH 4 concentration in air exhaled by four pasture-fed female Thuringian Forest goats when they were either expressing their natural grazing behaviour or when they were manually restrained at three times of the day during five consecutive days. We compared the activities, including rumination, and the CH 4 concentration between restrained and free-roaming goats, and between goats, days, times of the day and goats' activities. We hypothesised that the restraint influences the goats' behaviour, particularly rumination, which could lead to a change in CH 4 concentration. The overall CH 4 concentration (median) was not affected by goats' restraint (6.5 ppm-m for restrained vs. 6.6 ppm-m for free-roaming). However, restraint influenced goats' rumination activity, with differences between individual goats and days. A lower rumination activity was recorded on the first and the last two days as compared to Day 2-3. Despite the greater rumination activity, the CH 4 concentration was smaller on Day 2 (5.8 ppm-m) as compared to Day 5 (7.4 ppm-m). Similar observations were made with respect to behaviour and CH 4 concentrations in free-roaming goats. By contrast, no differences in the proportion of time of activities were found between the times of day for restrained goats, while free-roaming goats preferred to stand idle but were less frequently lying idle in late afternoon. Still, the greatest CH 4 concentration in restrained goats was obtained for the midday measurements (7.0 ppm-m), while it further increased until late afternoon for free-roaming goats (6.8 ppm-m). It is concluded that the restraint of animals during outdoor measurements can facilitate LMD measurements in grazing animals without changing the results for CH 4 concentration in air exhaled by the animal. An adaptation period of one day followed by two to three measurement days with sufficient measurement periods to account for different activities is recommended to limit the impact on animals' stress level.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (23)

  1. Allen, M.R., Shine, K.P., Fuglestvedt, J.S., Millar, R.J., Cain, M., Frame, D.J., Macey, A.H., 2018. A solution to the misrepresentations of CO 2 -equivalent emissions of short-lived cli- mate pollutants under ambitious mitigation. Npj Climate and Atmospheric Science 1, 16.
  2. Blaise, Y., Andriamandroso, A.L.H., Beckers, Y., Heinesch, B., Muñoz, E.C., Soyeurt, H., Froidmont, E., Lebeau, F., Bindelle, J., 2018. The time after feeding alters methane emission kinetics in Holstein dry cows fed with various restricted diets. Livestock Sci- ence 217, 99-107.
  3. Cain, M., Lynch, J., Allen, M.R., Fuglestvedt, J.S., Frame, D.J., Macey, A.H., 2019. Improved calculation of warming-equivalent emissions for short-lived climate pollutants. Npj Climate and Atmospheric Science 2, 29.
  4. Chagunda, M.G.G., Ross, D., Roberts, D.J., 2009. On the use of a laser methane detector in dairy cows. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 68, 157-160.
  5. Chagunda, M.G.G., Ross, D., Rooke, J., Yan, T., Douglas, J.-L., Poret, L., McEwan, N.R., Teeranavattanakul, P., Roberts, D.J., 2013. Measurement of enteric methane from ru- minants using a hand-held laser methane detector. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A Animal Science 63, 68-75.
  6. Core Team, R., 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Founda- tion for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
  7. Dinno, A., 2017. dunn.test: Dunn's test of multiple comparisons using rank sums. R pack- age version 1.3.5. Retrieved on 30 May 2019 from. https://CRAN.R-project.org/pack- age=dunn.test.
  8. Fox, J., Weisberg, S., 2019. An R companion to applied regression. third edition. SAGE Pub- lications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA 91320, US Retrieved on 30 May 2019 from. https:// socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion/.
  9. Grobler, S.M., Scholtz, M.M., van Rooyen, H., Mpayipheli, M., Neser, F.W.C., 2014. Methane production in different breeds, grazing different pastures or fed a total mixed ration, as measured by a Laser Methane Detector. South African Journal of Animal Science 44, S12-S16.
  10. Hales, K.E., Cole, N.A., 2017. Hourly methane production in finishing steers fed at different levels of dry matter intake. Journal of Animal Science 95, 2089-2096.
  11. Hammond, K.J., Crompton, L.A., Bannink, A., Dijkstra, J., Yáňez-Ruiz, D.R., O'Kiely, P., Kebreab, E., Eugène, M.A., Yu, Z., Shingfield, K.J., Schwarm, A., Hristov, A.N., Reynolds, C.K., 2016. Review of current in vivo measurement techniques for quantify- ing enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology 219, 13-30.
  12. Klein, B.G., 2019. Physiology of the gastrointestinal tract. In: Klein, B.G. (Ed.), Cunningsham's textbook of veterinary physiology. Elsevier Health Sciences, St. Louis, MI, USA (263-258).
  13. Mapfumo, L., Grobler, S.M., Mupangwa, J.F., Scholtz, M.M., Muchenje, V., 2018. Enteric methane output from selected herds of beef cattle raised under extensive arid rangelands. Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice 8, 15.
  14. Moyo, M., Adebayo, R.A., Nsahlai, I.V., 2018. Effects of roughage quality, period of day and time lapse after meal termination on rumen digesta load in goats and sheep. Asian- Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 31, 1183-1196.
  15. Pachauri, R.K., Allen, M.R., Barros, V.R., Broome, J., Cramer, W., Christ, R., Church, J.A., Clarke, L., Dahe, Q., Dasgupta, P., 2014. Synthesis report. IPCC 2014: climate change 2014. contribution of working Groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, England.
  16. Pszczola, M., Rzewuska, K., Mucha, S., Strabel, T., 2017. Heritability of methane emissions from dairy cows over a lactation measured on commercial farms. Journal of Animal Science 95, 4813-4819.
  17. Rey, J., Atxaerandio, R., Ruiz, R., Ugarte, E., González-Recio, O., Garcia-Rodriguez, A., Goiri, I., 2019. Comparison between non-invasive methane measurement techniques in cattle. Animals 9, 563.
  18. Ricci, P., Chagunda, M.G.G., Rooke, J., Houdijk, J.G.M., Duthie, C.-A., Hyslop, J., Roehe, R., Waterhouse, A., 2014. Evaluation of the laser methane detector to estimate methane emissions from ewes and steers. Journal of Animal Science 92, 5239-5250.
  19. Roessler, R., Chefor, F., Schlecht, E., 2018. Using a portable laser methane detector in goats to assess diurnal, diet-and position-dependent variations in enteric methane emis- sions. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 150, 110-117.
  20. Schilling, A.-K., Reese, S., Palme, R., Erhard, M., Wöhr, A.-C., 2015. Stress assessment in small ruminants kept on city farms in Southern Germany. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 18, 119-132.
  21. Sorg, D., Difford, G.F., Mühlbach, S., Kuhla, B., Swalve, H.H., Lassen, J., Strabel, T., Pszczola, M., 2018. Comparison of a laser methane detector with the GreenFeed and two breath analysers for on-farm measurements of methane emissions from dairy cows. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 153, 285-294.
  22. Vrancken, H., Suenkel, M., Hargreaves, P.R., Chew, L., Towers, E., 2019. Reduction of enteric methane emission in a commercial dairy farm by a novel feed supplement. Open Journal of Animal Sciences 9, 286-296.
  23. Yardimci, M., Sahin, E.H., Cetingul, I.S., Bayram, I., Aslan, R., Sengor, E., 2013. Stress re- sponses to comparative handling procedures in sheep. Animal 7, 143-150.