Evaluating the new universities project outcomes using the PMBOK project (original) (raw)
Related papers
Universities Project Performance - Reality And Trends
SEA: Practical Application of Science, 2018
The article reveals data about the managerial performance of Universitaria Consortium; as subjects for national and international funding, the four universities have large numbers of finalized and ongoing educational and research projects, their deliverables affecting the institutional international ranking. The article tries to reveal if there is any connection between the number of nationally and internationally funded projects specific for each of the four institutions considered, and their international metaranking. The empirical study used an extensive analysis of a series of factors important for universities performance. Data was available on institutions websites, projects paperwork and relevant ministries reports. The conclusions of the article show that there is not a strong connection between the number of projects developed by universities and their academic performance, since subjects with lower educational route have some of the highest numbers of developed projects. The results are relevant not only for the institutional management of the four universities, but also for governmental and non-governmental funding programs managers, and the decisions they make for raising the competitiveness among applicants.
The purpose of this paper is to identify different components that can help to determine the effect of study findings and to identify different methodologies as well. To clarify the extent of the study on the impact assessment of funded initiatives in various countries, a systematic literature review is carried out. Methodology: It is important to consider the effects of scientific findings to achieve value for the resources spent in science and technology. A systematic literature review (SLR) is carried out to gain a detailed understanding of the different literature available in the area of assessment of the search results of the projects funded. A total of 72 papers are collected from Google scholars to perform the SRL, which are screened according to the requirements for inclusion and exclusion. Further 20 papers, primarily focusing on two study fields, namely the academic and health care industries, are accepted. The 20 papers chosen are mapped accordingly based on the market, country of origin, variables, and approaches used by different authors. Conclusion: To determine the most significant variables commonly used by numerous writers in their studies, a systematic literature review is undertaken. The methodologies used by writers in their studies are also identified in this study. This paper can also be used by other researchers to describe in their studies the components and methodologies commonly used. Originality/Value: The current research assists policymakers in making decisions on which components to examine when assessing funded initiatives that improve the effects, quality, and productivity in the higher educational sectors, and there has been relatively limited research in this field.
Research evaluation per discipline: a peer-review method and its outcomes
"Rons, N., De Bruyn, A. and Cornelis, J. (2008). Research evaluation per discipline: a peer-review method and its outcomes. Research Evaluation, 17(1), 45-57. PDF/DOI: http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.7033, or http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/095820208X240208 This paper describes the method for ex-post peer review evaluation per research discipline used at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and summarizes the outcomes obtained from it. The method produces pertinent advice and triggers responses - at the level of the individual researcher, the research team and the university’s research management - for the benefit of research quality, competitivity and visibility. Imposed reflection and contacts during and after the evaluation procedure modify the individual researcher’s attitude, improve the research teams' strategies and allow for the extraction of general recommendations that are used as discipline-dependent guidelines in the university’s research management. The deep insights gained in the different research disciplines and the substantial data sets on their research, support the university management in its policy decisions and in building policy instruments. Moreover, the results are used as a basis for comparison with other assessments, leading to a better understanding of the possibilities and limitations of different evaluation processes. The peer review method can be applied systematically in a pluri-annual cycle of research discipline evaluations to build up a complete overview, or it can be activated on an ad hoc basis for a particular discipline, based on demands from research teams or on strategic or policy arguments. "
2014
Research focus and leadership, the achievement of critical mass by research teams, the balance between project-driven research and more long term hypothesis-driven research, and targets for research funding are all strategic issues and in this regard the panels recommended more systematic consideration, aided for example by the establishment of Research Committees to assist Research Directors, and Advisory Boards for those groups with extensive external stakeholders. Other important strategic issues include clear criteria and operational procedures for assessing research productivity, a framework for setting of targets for individuals and teams to achieve (and associated reward mechanisms) and systematic methods for reporting research outputs and impacts, the latter with a view to preparing for national research assessment exercises. 9 A further strategic issue concerns engagement of the research teams with the national and international peers. The leading groups at the University have a continuous flow of international visitors as well as visits by MDH faculty and PhD students to universities abroad. The whole University should aspire to such practice, and to engagement with international academic societies including the hosting of conferences and other research meetings. Routes to wider research collaborations, for example funded by the European Commission, would be a fruitful topic for discussion with the University's coproduction partners. Finally, while the assessment panels concentrated principally on research within subject areas, it was clear that there would be significant merit in exploring what opportunities exist for interdisciplinary collaborative work between the subject areas, for example the use of embedded systems in healthcare or assistive technologies, or eco-innovation through combination of work in future energy systems with innovation and produce realisation. National and international research is increasingly directed at societal grand challenges. MDH has the mix of expertise to make significant contribution to tackling these.
The 5–100 Project University Development Trends and Patterns
Russian Education & Society, 2018
The article presents the results of an analytical study that explores the development patterns of universities that participate in the Russian Academic Excellence Initiative (the 5-100 Project) in terms of their financing structure, their priority development areas, and the trends for key performance indicators. By using statistical methods, including cluster analysis, we have attempted to establish the development patterns of universities that are participating in the project from various angles. Our analysis was based on data from the Monitoring Study of the Performance of Institutions of Higher Education conducted by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation as well as
Scientific research evaluation: a review of methods and various contexts of their application
R&D Management, 1987
The author has conducted a critical review of methods for evaluating R&D, focussing on levels above the individual project or researcher. Methods are classified as peer review, interview and questionnaire, qualitative methods, and case studies. The author reviews their methodological strengths and weaknesses, the types of criteria applied (eg internal or external) in judging their values, and the uses to which the results of the evaluations are put, especially in policy-making. She concludes that at the level considered evaluations have come to stay, but she can find no accepted rationale guiding the choice of method for a particular purpose or circumstance. Caution is therefore needed in selecting methods. She points out the need for empirical study of the effects of such evaluations.