My Social Comfort Zone: Attachment Anxiety Shapes Peripersonal and Interpersonal Space (original) (raw)
Our perception of our personal space extends beyond the body to incorporate the space where inter-actions with the environment occur, i.e. peripersonal space (PPS), and the distance we feel comforta-ble in maintaining while interacting with other people, termed interpersonal space. Studies suggest that after positive interpersonal exchanges, PPS expands in order to create a space for interaction, while interpersonal space becomes smaller. However, little is known about how this malleability of our peripersonal and interpersonal space based on social context can be shaped by key individual traits of interpersonal relating, such as attachment style. In a first, exploratory study (N=48) using a visuo-tactile detection task in augmented reality, we found that when people scoring higher in attachment anxiety are in the presence of a stranger, relative to alone, their PPS becomes less defined, whereas the reverse pattern is observed in people scoring lower in attachment anxiety. In a foll...
Related papers
The physiological correlates of interpersonal space
Scientific Reports
Interpersonal space (IPS) is the area around the body that individuals maintain between themselves and others during social interactions. When others violate our IPS, feeling of discomfort rise up, urging us to move farther away and reinstate an appropriate interpersonal distance. Previous studies showed that when individuals are exposed to closeness of an unknown person (a confederate), the skin conductance response (SCR) increases. However, if the SCR is modulated according to participant’s preferred IPS is still an open question. To test this hypothesis, we recorded the SCR in healthy participants when a confederate stood in front of them at various distances simulating either an approach or withdrawal movement (Experiment 1). Then, the comfort-distance task was adopted to measure IPS: participants stop the confederate, who moved either toward or away from them, when they felt comfortable with other’s proximity (Experiment 2). We found higher SCR when the confederate stood closer...
Attachment styles in everyday social interaction
European Journal of Social Psychology, 2002
For seven days, participants described the important interactions they had using a variant of the Rochester Interaction Record and reported their attachment style using Bartholomew's four‐category system. A series of multilevel random coefficient analyses found that across all interactions securely attached participants, compared to those who were insecurely attached, found their interactions to be more intimate and more positive emotionally. Secure participants also felt that others were more responsive to them and their needs. Secure–insecure differences were most pronounced when secure and dismissive avoidant participants were compared. Differences between secure and fearful types were minimal. In contrast, differences in reactions to interactions with close and not close friends were more pronounced for fearful types than for secures, dismissing, or preoccupied types. These results highlight the importance of distinguishing fearful and dismissive avoidance. Copyright © 2002 ...
Sensitivity to Affective Touch Depends on Adult Attachment Style
Affective touch supports affiliative bonds and social cognition. However, it remains unknown whether pre-existing models of social relating influence the perception of affective touch. Here, we present the first study (N=44) to examine how individual differences in attachment styles relate to the perception of affective touch, as well as to a different non-social modality of interoception, namely cardiac perceived accuracy. Using the gold standard assessment of adult attachment (Adult Attachment Interview), we found that insecure attachment was associated with reduced pleasantness discrimination between affective vs. non-affective, neutral touch. Acknowledging the different traditions in measuring attachment, we also used a well-validated self-report questionnaire that pertains to explicit representations of current close relationships. Using this measure, we found that higher scores on an attachment anxiety dimension (but not an attachment avoidance) were associated with reduced pl...
Your Place or Mine: Shared Sensory Experiences Elicit a Remapping of Peripersonal Space
Neuropsychologia, 2014
Our perceptual systems integrate multisensory information about objects that are close to our bodies, which allow us to respond quickly and appropriately to potential threats, as well as act upon and manipulate useful tools. Intriguingly, the representation of this area close to our body, known as the multisensory ‘peripersonal space’ (PPS), can expand or contract during social interactions. However, it is not yet known how different social interactions can alter the representation of PPS. In particular, shared sensory experiences, such as those elicited by bodily illusions such as the enfacement illusion, can induce feelings of ownership over the other’s body which has also been shown to increase the remapping of the other’s sensory experiences onto our own bodies. The current study investigated whether such shared sensory experiences between two people induced by the enfacement illusion could alter the way PPS was represented, and whether this alteration could be best described as an expansion of one’s own PPS towards the other or a remapping of the other’s PPS onto one’s own. An audio-tactile integration task allowed us to measure the extent of the PPS before and after a shared sensory experience with a confederate. Our results showed a clear increase in audio-tactile integration in the space close to the confederate’s body after the shared experience. Importantly, this increase did not extend across the space between the participant and confederate, as would be expected if the participant’s PPS had expanded. Thus, the pattern of results is more consistent with a partial remapping of the confederate’s PPS onto the participant’s own PPS. These results have important consequences for our understanding of interpersonal space during different kinds of social interactions.
Psychological and physiological evidence for an initial ‘Rough Sketch’ calculation of personal space
Scientific Reports
Personal space has been defined as “the area individuals maintain around themselves into which others cannot intrude without arousing discomfort”. However, the precise relationship between discomfort (or arousal) responses as a function of distance from an observer remains incompletely understood. Also the mechanisms involved in recognizing conspecifics and distinguishing them from other objects within personal space have not been identified. Accordingly, here we measured personal space preferences in response to real humans and human-like avatars (in virtual reality), using well-validated “stop distance” procedures. Based on threshold measurements of personal space, we examined within-subject variations in discomfort-related responses across multiple distances (spanning inside and outside each individual’s personal space boundary), as reflected by psychological (ratings) and physiological (skin conductance) responses to both humans and avatars. We found that the discomfort-by-dista...
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.