A Review of Session "Polycentric Nuclear Order: Risks Uncontrolled" (original) (raw)
Related papers
Nuclear Realities : Worlds Apart
2015
eprints@whiterose.ac.uk https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item.
2004
Correspondents Argentina: O. Civitaresse, La Plata; Australia: A. W. Thomas, Adelaide; Austria: H. Leeb, Vienna; Belgium: G. Neyens, Leuven; Brasil: M. Hussein, São Paulo; Bulgaria: D. Balabanski, Sofia; Canada: J.-M. Poutissou, TRIUMF; K, Sharma, Manitoba; C. Svensson, Guelph: China: W. Zhan, Lanzhou; Croatia: R. Caplar, Zagreb; Czech Republic: J. Kvasil, Prague; Slovak Republic: P. Povinec, Bratislava; Denmark: K. Riisager, Århus; Finland: M. Leino, Jyväskylä; France: G. De France, GANIL Caen; M. MacCormick, IPN Orsay; Germany: K. Langanke, GSI Darmstadt; U. Wiedner, Bochum; Greece: E. Mavromatis, Athens; Hungary: B. M. Nyakó, Debrecen; India: D. K. Avasthi, New Delhi; Israel: N. Auerbach, Tel Aviv; Italy: M. Ripani, Genova; L. Corradi, Legnaro; Japan: T. Motobayashi, RIKEN; Mexico: J. Hirsch, Mexico DF; Netherlands: G. Onderwater, KVI Groningen; T. Peitzmann, Utrecht; Norway: J. Vaagen, Bergen; Poland: B. Fornal, Cracow; Portugal: M. Fernanda Silva, Sacavém; Romania: V. Zamfir, B...
Semantics and Ideology of Nuclear Order
Security Dialogues, 2022
The article deals with the substance and rhetoric of the notion "nuclear order" in a deconstructivity manner. Building on the definition of nuclear order as a set of institutions, norms, and practices governing the development and use of nuclear technology, the analysis focuses more on what is behind this "pragmatic compromise" in the world of international (and nuclear) anarchy. The key premise is that the discourse and politics of nuclear order are mechanisms of normalization of nuclear danger as something that can be managed and well-ordered. This kind of thinking and dealing with the nuclear threat, which is becoming an imminent one by a day, is embedded in the ideology of imperial status quo. At a time when the humanity faces existential threat(s), inter alia because of a possible nuclear clash, the academic rhetoric and action should shift the paradigm away from the "Don't Look Up" film parody. The current arrangements of nuclear constraints, deterrence, non-proliferation etc. should be pictured for what they really are: a politics of acceptance to a life on a brink of total disaster based on the false belief that the national security state and the military alliances are able to protect Us vs Them.