An investigation of prevention strategies applied to minimize student deviant behaviour in secondary schools within Bungoma County, Kenya (original) (raw)

Perceived Causes of Deviant Behavior among Secondary School Students in Kebete Sub County, Kiambu County, Kenya

Background:A smooth teaching-learning process is highly dependent on how the learner and the teacher relate. It is also influenced by how learners get along among themselves. The relationship among learners and between learners and teachers can be affected by factors that are home related, school related, mass media/social mediarelated, parenting styles, among others. The objective of this study was to identify causes of deviant behavior among secondary school students in Kiambu County. Materials and Methods: The exploratory approach using survey design was employed. Purposive/judgmental sampling was used to select all schools and all the principals. Deputy Principals, class teachers and guidance and counseling teachers in Kabete Sub County. A questionnaire with a list of possible causes of deviant behavior was administered to the teachers. Data was analyzed by use of descriptive statistic using tables and frequencies. Results:Majority of the teacher cited major causes of deviant behavior among the students as media/social media (80%), overprotection at home (79%), broken homes (70%)and overloading at school(65%), family conflicts(58%), poverty (57%), parental negligence and exam pressure (55%)and fear and failure(50%). Conclusion: Majority of the teachers perceived that most causes of deviant behavior were home-related.

Alternative Corrective Measures Used in Managing Student Behavior Problems in Secondary Schools in Bondo Sub County, Kenya

Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 2015

The purpose of the study was to identify alternative corrective measures used by teachers to manage students' behavior problems in secondary schools. The study was informed by Assertive Discipline Model and Thorndike's Behavior Modification Theory. Mixed methods research approach was used and with it, concurrent triangulation design was adopted. Target population of the study was composed of 308 teachers from a total number of 34 schools that had 34 Heads of Guidance and Counseling, 34 Deputy Principals and 240 classroom teachers. Krejcie & Morgan sample size determination table and stratified random sampling technique was used to sample 28 Deputy Principals from a total number of 34 deputy principals, 28 Heads of Guidance and Counseling from a total number of 34 and 152 teachers from a total of 240. Pilot study was done in three schools that didn't participate in the actual study to determine reliability of the instruments and split half method was used to ascertain a reliability coefficient of 0.871. Face validity of the instruments was ascertained by pilot testing the questionnaires and also by seeking expert judgment by university lecturers. Data was collected using questionnaires, in-depth interviews and document analysis guides. Quantitative data was analyzed using basic descriptive statistics and inferential statistics. Qualitative data from interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. The study findings revealed that alternative corrective measures like guidance and counseling, manual work, temporary withdrawal from class, withdrawal of privileges and suspension were used in managing student behavior problems. However, it was established that use of rules and detention were not preferred as alternative methods of managing student behavior problems.