John McLean: Moderate Abolitionist and Supreme Court Politician (original) (raw)
Related papers
2007
Waite fulfilled the responsibilities of managerial, intellectual, and social leadership during his tenure as Chief Justice; second, provides the results from a quantitative analysis of all Supreme Court decisions during the Waite era; third, presents a qualitative analysis of those cases in which Justice Harlan and Chief Justice Waite recorded divergent opinions; and fourth, reviews Justice Harlan's contributions to Strauder v. West Virginia vi and the Civil Rights Cases. vii Part III, first, discusses the extent to which Chief Justice Fuller fulfilled the responsibilities of managerial, intellectual, and social leadership during his tenure as Chief Justice; second, provides the results from a quantitative analysis of all Supreme Court decisions during the Fuller era; third, presents a qualitative analysis of those cases in which Justice Harlan and Chief Justice Fuller recorded divergent opinions; and fourth, reviews Justice Harlan's contributions to Fong Yue Ting v. United States viii and Plessy v. Ferguson. ix Part IV, first, discusses the extent to which Chief Justice White fulfilled the responsibilities of managerial, intellectual, and social leadership during his career as Chief Justice; second, provides the results from a quantitative analysis of all Supreme Court decisions during the White era; third, presents a qualitative analysis of those cases in which Justice Harlan and Chief Justice White recorded divergent opinions; and fourth, reviews Justice Harlan's contribution to Standard Oil Company v. United States. x Part V concludes that Justice Harlan's judicial philosophy remained independent throughout his term on the Court and that the Chief Justices with whom he served likely had little influence on his decisionmaking.
Law and History Review, 2010
There is an interesting section on the transition to the job-the heavy learning curve, the problems of getting an office running, and the remarkable variety of cases federal judges confront. The chapter on the nature of the job holds few surprises. Most judges like the job with its broad range of subjects and conflicts, although there are complaints about the isolation. It is, though, disturbing to see such distinguished judges and ex-judges as Abner Mikva, Robert Bork, and James Buckley agreeing, at least on their notable Court of Appeals (D.C. Cir.), that after the conference on a case, the judge will go back and likely never speak again in person with his colleagues about it. When coupled with the "revelation" in another chapter that the law clerks are chiefly responsible for opinions (183), one cannot help wondering what creative, thoughtful, and analytical work federal judges are actually doing. A chapter partially named "Getting Along with Others" encompasses Alfred Goodwin's (9th Cir.) discussion of political trials. There is an interesting, though troubling, discussion of past tensions on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals and two pages allotted to Andrew Hauk's (C.D. Cal.) oral history demonstrating his "outrageous rudeness." Finally, Joyce Hens Green sums up what makes a good judge: "A judge has to have courage and express the way it is in her opinions, whether oral or written, not just to ride with the waves of the time, economically, politically, emotionally" (212). Both specialists and nonspecialists will learn from Domnarski's book. Nonspecialists will receive a painless introduction to the lives of federal judges and the conditions under which they work. The scholar will pick up a variety of interesting tidbits with a reminder of what a valuable resource for research on the courts oral histories can be.