Non-Radiographic Risk Factors Differentiating Atypical Lipomatous Tumors from Lipomas (original) (raw)
Related papers
American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 2010
Ancillary molecular testing has been advocated for diagnostic accuracy in the differentiation of lipomas from atypical lipomatous tumors/well-differentiated liposarcomas (ALT/WDL); however, the implications and specific indications for use are not well-established in the current literature. Herein, we extend previous findings by quantitatively evaluating the impact of molecular testing of lipomatous neoplasms in our routine clinical practice, how it modifies the historical perspective of their clinical course, and the effect of distinct surgical procedures in modulating the risk of local recurrence for these tumors after molecular classification. On the basis of these analyses, we suggest a specific set of basic recommendations for complementary molecular assessment in the diagnosis of lipomatous tumors. Four hundred and five lipomatous neoplasms located in the trunk and extremities were analyzed histologically and for the presence of 12q13-15 amplification on paraffin-embedded tissues by assessing MDM2/CPM amplification. Survival analyses were calculated with Kaplan-Meier and compared with the log-rank. Multivariate analysis was evaluated by the Cox regression method. The 405 tumors were histologically classified as ordinary lipoma (n = 324), intramuscular lipoma (n = 29), and ALT/WDL (n = 52). The level of agreement between the histologic diagnosis and the molecular diagnosis was high (96%) but pathologists showed a tendency to overestimate cytologic atypia and the diagnosis of ALT/WDL (precision, 79%; accuracy, 88%). Molecular assessment led to a major diagnostic reclassification in 18 tumors (4%). Eleven of the tumors histologically classified as ALT/WDL were reclassified as ordinary lipoma (n = 5) and intramuscular lipoma (n = 6); none of which recurred. Seven ordinary lipomas were reclassified as ALT/WDL, 6 of which were larger than 15 cm and deeply located; 2 recurred locally. After molecular data, the 5-year local recurrence rates for ordinary lipoma, intramuscular lipoma, and ALT/WDL were 1%, 12%, and 44%, respectively. Multivariate analyses after molecular assessment showed tumor type and type of resection to be associated with the risk of local recurrence. Complementary molecular testing refines the histologic classification of lipomatous tumors and better estimates the impact of surgical procedures on the risk of local recurrence. Pathologists tend to overestimate the degree of cytologic atypia and the indiscriminate use of molecular testing should be avoided, especially for extremity-based tumors. Molecular testing should be considered for ''relapsing lipomas,'' tumors with questionable cytologic atypia (even if widely excised), or for large lipomatous tumors (>15 cm) without diagnostic cytologic atypia.
Asian Journal of Surgery, 2019
Background: Atypical lipomatous tumor (ALT) is a low-grade malignancy that frequently occurs at a subfascial anatomical location. While marginal excision is adequate for lipomas, excision with a surgical margin is suggested for ALTs. However, ALTs and lipomas are difficult to differentiate preoperatively, even with the help of imaging studies. In this study, we aimed to formulate a scoring system based on selected clinical and imaging characteristics to enhance the accuracy of pre-operative diagnosis of deep-seated ALTs. Methods: We enrolled 417 cases of deep-seated lipoma and 53 cases of ALTs from soft tissue treated between 2005 and 2016. Tumors arising from the bone, internal cavities, retroperitoneum, or nervous system were excluded. Clinical data were analyzed along with magnetic resonance image (MRI) features. We further developed a scoring formula to distinguish deep-seated ALTs from lipomas. Results: Older age, tumor location at lower limbs, and the presence of MRI features (larger size, thick septa > 2 mm, contrast enhancement>1 cm, fat component <75%) are identified as risk factors of ALT and were utilized to develop a scoring system for distinguishing ALTs from lipomas. The formula exhibited 90% sensitivity and 92.5% specificity, and a score more than 0.214 suggested a diagnosis of ALT.
Patterns of recurrence in extremity liposarcoma
Cancer, 1999
BACKGROUND. Liposarcoma is one of the most common histologic types of soft tissue sarcoma and presents a wide spectrum of clinical behavior. The authors examined the correlation among histologic subtypes, outcomes, and patterns of recurrence among patients with extremity liposarcomas.
Lipomatous Tumors: A Comparison of MRI-Reported Diagnosis with Histological Diagnosis
Diagnostics
Lipomatous tumors are among the most common soft tissue tumors (STTs). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a state-of-the-art diagnostic tool used to differentiate and characterize STTs. Radiological misjudgment can lead to incorrect treatment. This was a single-center retrospective study. Two hundred and forty lipomatous tumors were included. MRI diagnoses were categorized as benign, intermediate, or malignant and were compared with histological diagnoses. Tumor volumes were measured by MRI and from surgical specimens. The tumor was correctly categorized 73.3% of the time. A total of 21.7% of tumors were categorized as more malignant in MRI reports than they were by histology, and vice versa for 5.0% of tumors. Volume measured by MRI was not different from actual tumor size in pathology. Atypical lipomatous tumors (ALTs) and liposarcomas (LPSs) were larger when compared with lipomata and occurred in older patients. Based on the MRI-suspected tumor entity, surgical treatment can be ...
Atypical Lipomatous Tumor/Well Differentiated Liposarcoma: a Borderline Malignancy Tumor
Modern Medicine, 2016
Controversy exists with regard to the nomenclature, treatment and outcome of a group of well-differentiated lipomatous tumors sometimes labelled as atypical lipomatous tumors. For elimination of inadequate or excessive treatment it has been advocated that the term well-differentiated liposarcomas be retained for retroperitoneal/mediastinal tumors and atypical lipomatous tumors for the rest of the sites. The most important prognostic factor for ALT/WD liposarcoma is anatomic location, overall mortality ranging from 0% for ALT of the extremities to more than 80% for WD liposarcomas occurring in the retroperitoneum if the patients are followed up for 10-20 years. Primary treatment of ALT/WD liposarcoma is represented by a complete, preferably wide-margin surgical resection. The role of radiation therapy for atypical lipomatous tumors/well-differentiated liposarcomas is still unclear. Despite the side effects of postoperative radiation therapy it has been shown that in patients with positive surgical margins postoperative RT in doses over 64Gy, improves local control.
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, 2012
Background The 5-year survival rates for localized liposarcomas reportedly vary from 75% to 91% with histologic grade as the most important prognostic factor. However, it is unclear which other factors, including the initial surgery quality and recurrent tumors, influence survival in localized liposarcomas (LPS). Questions/Purposes We analyzed factors (including AJCC staging system) influencing survival and local control of resectable LPS of the extremities/trunk wall and the impact of surgery quality and tumor status and type of disease recurrences according to pathological subtype. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 181 patients with localized LPS: 110 were treated for primary tumors, 50 for recurrent tumors, and 21 for wide scar resection after unplanned nonradical resection. We determined survival rates and examined factors influencing survival. The minimum followup was 4 months (median, 52 months; range, 4-168 months). Results Five-year disease-specific (DSS), disease-free (DFS), and local relapse-free survival (LRFS) rates were: 80%, 58%, and 75%, respectively. Five-year local relapsefree survival rates for primary versus clinically recurrent tumor versus scar after nonradical resection were: 86.1%, 52.1%, and 73.3%, respectively. The following were independent negative prognostic factors for DSS (AJCC Stage C IIb), DFS (Grade 3; clinical recurrence; skin infiltration), and LRFS (clinical recurrence; R1 resection). An unplanned excision, although influencing local relapse-free survival, had no impact on disease-specific survival (calculated from date of first excision 5-year rate of 80%, considering impact of combined treatment of clinical recurrence/scar). Conclusions We confirmed the value of AJCC staging for predicting disease-specific survival in extremity/trunk wall LPS. Radical reresection of scar after nonradical primary tumor resection (+ radiotherapy) seems to improve Each author certifies that he or she, or a member of their immediate family, has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request. Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.
Scientific Reports
Suspicion of malignant change within a lipoma is a common and increasing workload within the UK Sarcoma multidisciplinary team (MDT) network, and a source of considerable patient anxiety. Currently, there is no lipoma-specific data, with regard to which clinical or radiographic features predict non-benign histology, or calculate an odds-ratio specific to a lipomatous lesion being non-benign. We performed a 9-year, double-blind, unmatched cohort study, comparing post-operative histology outcomes (benign versus non-benign) versus 15 signs across three domains: Clinical (size of tumour, depth, growth noticed by patient, previous lipoma, patient felt pain), Ultrasonographic (size, depth, vascularity, heterogenous features, septae) and MRI (size, depth, vascularity, heterogenous features, septae, complete fat signal suppression). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, odds ratios and binary logistic regression analysis was performed double-blind. When each sign is considered i...
Beyond the depths: deep-seated lipoma of the upper limb
European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2013
Background Deep-seated lipomas are mature fat tissues which may occur in intermuscular, intramuscular, or submuscular locations. Unlike benign subcutaneous lipoma, which usually only grow on skin surface, deep-seated lipoma generally grow slowly and may sometimes infiltrate deeply and wrap around nerves. Methods A retrospective review of all patients with deepseated lipomas of the upper limb, operated on between 2002 and 2009 at our center, was carried out. Clinical and radiological characteristics, treatment, and evolution profile of these patients were also evaluated. Results Five patients were identified. The mean age of patients was 71 years (range 60 to 77 years). The mean follow-up period was 2 years and there was no recurrence after the surgery. Conclusions The complicated growing patterns of deepseated lipoma have brought about difficulties during diagnostic and surgical procedures. A marked similarity of physical characteristics between a deep-seated lipoma and other softtissue masses can cause several confusions, while a careless dissection can cause severe damage to nearby nerves. Level of Evidence: Level V, therapeutic study
Intramuscular lipoma of the lower limb. Long-term follow-up after local resection
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1989
We report 12 patients with infiltrating muscular lipomas of the lower limbs all treated by wide resection. During follow-up averaging seven years, the tumour recurred in five patients. Our results and those reported by others suggest that, in order to avoid recurrence, this tumour, although benign, should be treated by total excision of the muscle or by compartmental resection. Hormonal imbalance was suspected in 9 of the patients but an oestrogen receptor analysis of the histological samples proved negative.