OTTOMAN MERCHANTS IN DISPUTE WITH THE REPUBLIC OF VENICE AT THE END OF THE 16TH CENTURY: SOME GLANCES ON THE CONTESTED REGIME OF THE CAPITULATIONS (original) (raw)

Trade and Merchants in the 16th Century Ottoman-Polish Treaties

1994

Résumé/Abstract Les traités («'ahdnames») entre l'Empire Ottoman et la Pologne au 16 ème siècle présentaient les conditions de sécurité et de protection pour le commerce et les commerçants des deux parties signataires. Ces traités leur assuraient un accès protégé par terre et mer, la sécurité de la personne et de la propriété, la liberté et la sécurité du commerce et certians privilèges juridiques. Les commerçants polonais bénéficiaient d'un statut spécial et d'un régime de faveur.

Maria Pia Pedani, A Culture of Trust. Ottoman Merchants and Venetian Notaries in the Early Modern Period, in Venetians and Ottomans in the Early Modern Age. Essays on Economic and Social Connected History, edited by Anna Valerio, Venezia, Edizioni Ca’ Foscari, 2018, pp. 31-47

In the Modern Age from the 16th to the 18th c. international trade between Venice and Istanbul was not exclusively in Venetian hands. Ottoman ships sailed the Mediterranean and the Adriatic and foreign merchants used to buy and sell goods on the Rialto market and to frequent Dalmatian ports. Having so many contacts with Europeans, Ottoman merchants too began to become acquainted with the other’s legal institutions. They began to appoint agents or even consuls to represents themselves, to go to notaries instead of kadı to make wills or to sign proxies, to go to Venetian law courts to support their rights in cases of quarrels or inheritances and, last but not the least, also to take out an insurance to protect their goods or ships from the accidents that could happen at sea. Using Venetian documents kept in the Venetian State Archives this paper aims to present some example of deeds of this kind made by Ottoman Muslim subjects.

Maria Pia Pedani, Maritime insurances and the Ottoman merchants’ network in Venice (16th-17th c.).

The aim of this paper is to study the presence of Muslim merchants in Venice in the Modern Age with a special focus on the maritime insurances they made to protect their goods. First of all we must stress the fact that, in the 16th and 17th c., the Ottomans who traded in Venice were not alone but could make reference to a real commercial network. Moreover, to regulate their business they could go to kadıs, before leaving their country, but also, later, to Venetian notaries. Notarial deeds give us information on shipping partnerships, family companies, grandees involved in international trade and on companies of merchants both in Istanbul and Venice. The oldest witness of an insurance made by an Ottoman Muslim dates back to 1559: it was made by the agent of the great admiral Piyale pasha, the money was paid in Ancona but it was made by Venetian insurers. Other documents dating back to the following period show that Ottoman merchants were more and more involved in insurances and that, in the 18th c., to ensure goods became quite common when they decided to go to Venice. In his book about business partnership Murat Çizakça (A Comparative Evolution of Business Partnership. The Islamic World and Europe, with Specific Reference to the Ottoman Archives, Brill, Leiden, 1996) states: “In the Ottoman case, it can be presumed that an effective maritime insurance did not exist. Certainly, not a single document has been found to indicate the contrary.” Documents still kept in the Venetian State Archives tell us that Ottomans could use Venetian insurers and also agree to make insurances in front of a kadı. Ancient historiographical theories say that in the Modern Age Ottoman Muslims were not interested in international trade and that they left it completely in Christian and Jewish hands, but documents tell us a completely different story, a story of contacts, exchanges, and even confidence and friendship. (paper presented to EBHA - Ancona 2018 but not delivered because I could not attend to the conference)

Diplomatic Encounters Between the Venetians and the Ottomans in Case of Captivity (1560-1590) Ph.D. dissertation, History Department, Bilkent University.

2023

This dissertation is about the transformation of the legal, economic and social status of captives taken during the wars between the Ottomans and Venetians. It also covers how the events between 1560-1590 affected both countries' and the Mediterranean's history. This study argues that the political, military, and economic interaction between the Republic of Venice and the Ottoman Empire profoundly affected the history of slavery in the Mediterranean. This dissertation focuses mainly on these two states. The changes in the status of war captives and slaves through the years were studied, along with the changes caused by the establishment of Ottoman domination in the region. After the emergence of the Ottomans, a regional power, it took a long time for the Venetian Republic, a European state with active commercial operations both in the Eastern

The last Venetian-Byzantine Trade Agreement and Mehmed II’s First Peace Agreement with Venice

Venetians and Ottomans in the Early Modern Age, 2018

The goal of this article is to compare two interstate commercial charters as the title suggests, a chrysobull by the Byzantine emperor John VIII and a document signed by Mehmed the Conqueror. The Ottoman Empire at that time was expanding at the expense of the Venetian thalassocracy, and particularly Byzantium. Venice, in its turn, was deriving more trade privileges from the dying Byzantine Empire. The emphasis in the article will be put on the similarities between the documents proving the continuity in the various spheres of international politics in the Late Middle Ages and the Early Modern Period.

«Greek subjects of Venice in Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Business: some sixteenth century case studies», Revues d’ Études Sud-Εst Européennes, LIX (2021), 207-215.

Studies on the maritime activities of Greeks in the sixteenth century, published in the last decades, have renewed research interest in this field, leading to the revision of the views of earlier researchers who describe Greek merchant shipping in the sixteenth century as an economic activity supported by a few boats, with which Greeks served local fishing and transporting activities, fearful of venturing beyond the safety of the coasts. Thanks to new bibliography it is documented the more active presence of subjects of Venice and foreigners in the maritime life of the State. The present study is part of a personal research project by the undersigned, aimed at compiling a typology of the participation of Greek subjects of Venice in maritime trade. As I see it, prerequisite for achieving this goal is the existence of a series of specific case studies. Some of these are proposed, in general outline, in this paper, referring to the years after the third Venetian-Ottoman war.

Otoman Empire Maritime Jurisdiction İn the Light of the Ahidnames Given to Venice in the Period Between the 16th and the 17th Century: A Guiding Note For the Prospective Researches

2015

International regulations in connection with the law of the sea have been considered by various researchers in terms of different perspectives so far. However, with this study, we are planning to recommend a new ground for the prospective researchers and provide basis for a deeper thinking regarding the contemporary challenges. In other words, opening a new gate in this context might shed some light on more comprehensive studies for the prospective researchers. To this end, by writing a guiding note on the Ottoman Empire Maritime Jurisdiction, we would like to make an attempt at taking the first step to draw the attention of researchers and contribute to their prospective researches accordingly. In a nutshell, it is our contention that this note might bring a new perspective for some of the prospective researchers on the law of the sea.

Sedentary Merchant Triumphant: The Transformation of Venetian Trading Patterns in the Long Twelfth Century

Business History Review, 2024

This paper examines the transformation of Venetian commerce across the twelfth century, arguing that the strategies of Venetian merchants are best described using two distinct models. One was locally integrated and geographically decentralized, typical of merchants who settled abroad and became part of local societies, sometimes retaining few clear links to Venice. The other was far more centralized, characterized by short-term, profit-focused ventures originating in Venice that precluded deep entanglements in foreign economies. Both models were facilitated by the unstructured nature of Venetian overseas administration, which accommodated a degree of autonomy for expatriates while providing the infrastructure necessary for transient commerce. The decline of the integrated model began with the imperial sanctions of 1171 and culminated with the Fourth Crusade (1202-1204), after which the centralized model came to dominate. The subsequent importance of the "sedentary merchant" in Venetian trade was shaped as much by political as by economic factors.