The Emergence of Tradition. Essays in legal anthropology (XVI-XVIII Centuries) (original) (raw)
The essays contained in this volume deal with some important questions concerning the relationship between the world of custom and the world that can be most precisely defined as cultivated, which found its expression in writing. For the medieval and modern periods, these questions involve a close relationship between the educated, elaborated and tendentially abstract viewpoint expressed through writing, and the one substantially tied to social practices, intimately connected to oral tradition and custom. It is not by chance that customs played a primary part in the hierarchy of sources which a judge theoretically had to take into consideration in his jurisprudential activity. The contact with the world of custom and tradition allows to see some of its most significant features, above all in the many judiciary cases produced by the ever more intrusive and classificatory activity of the ecclesiastical and secular institutions. It is possible to appreciate this aspect in many spheres of social and political life; however, it comes out most clearly in the complicated matter of marriage. The emergence of tradition, understood above all in the sense of custom and of a legal order characterized by orality and mediation, is therefore a historical and cultural phenomenon filtered in the modern period through the activity of secular and ecclesiastical institutions that aimed at regulating and constraining it within legal parameters reflecting new social and political instances. And the interpretative tool of legal anthropology helps the historian understand its scope and meanings. This collection of essays essentially intends to follow this line of interpretation, in an attempt to grasp through a varied and complex selection of judiciary cases the emergence of social practices that had long been grounded in custom and oral transmission.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research.
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
Traditio Canonica and Legal Tradition
In describing the role of traditio canonica in CIC 1983, this work evaluates if it can be properly defined as “legal tradition”, and which is its relation with existing legal traditions. So that, it will confirm the reciprocal enrichment between canon law and legal culture and the strictly legal essence of canon law. The analysis shows that canonical tradition, being itself a legal tradition, can indeed support every jurist who longs to escape the yoke of legalism.
The Lawyer Quarterly, 2016
One of the “pivotal” terms, showing the diversity of phenomena related to the cultural embedding of law is that of legal culture. It is used to describe the diversity of approaches to law as well as of the opinions on how this term is understood, on the role of social order, the practice of law application. The article deals with differences in the research approaches of various jurisprudential disciplines. Among the many topics covered in the article, the authors emphasize in particular the differences between the concept of “legal culture” in the textbooks of the history of law and social sciences, opposing legal history approach by that of legal sociology or philosophy of law. Striking in the attitude to the history of the numerous concepts of legal culture is the treatment of the historical phenomena not as an objective social, economic, or political reality, but as a certain intellectual construct that aims to “complete and justify the concept”. This is a purely instrumental ap...
The main sources of this article are 750 matrimonial trials discussed before the ecclesiastical court in Venice (1420-1545). This article analyzes the differing conceptions of marriage held by the laity and by the ecclesiastical hierarchy as these ideas were expressed in a dialectical relationship in court. Central to this analysis is the concept of consent, since consent, with widely differing interpretations, formed the foundation and the essence of both canonical and lay customary marriage. In the pre-Tridentine ecclesiastical court, custom played a leading role in deciding matters related to the marriage bond. These sources allow access to aspects of marriage that are usually not recorded and make it possible to reevaluate social phenomena which have been defined from a post-Tridentine perspective as transgressive. Practices such as bigamy, concubinage, and stuprum appear not as deviant, but as part of socially accepted marital behavior that is much broader and more heterogeneous than historians have appreciated.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.