To Eat or Not to Eat: Studies on the Biblical Dietary Prohibitions (original) (raw)
Related papers
Food Taboos and Biblical Prohibitions Reassessing Archaeological and Literary Perspectives
2020
This volume presents contributions from »The Larger Context of the Biblical Food Prohibitions: Comparative and Interdisciplinary Approaches« conference held in Lausanne in June, 2017. The biblical food prohibitions constitute an excellent object for comparative and interdisciplinary approaches given their materiality, their nature as comparative objects between cultures, and their nature as an anthropological object. This volume articulates these three aspects within an integrated and dynamic perspective, bringing together contributions from Levantine archaeology, ancient Near Eastern studies, and anthropological and textual perspectives to form a new, multi-disciplinary foundation for interpretation.
Israel Affairs, 2019
The writings of ancient Greece and Rome and of biblical Israel are filled with descriptions of food. Tellingly, the narratives in Greek and Roman mythology and poetry often describe violent and repulsive behavior. The biblical narratives, in contrast, tend to view food in a respectful and purposeful manner. This article compares and contrasts some of these stories with regard to the specific themes mentioned in its title: restraint, respect, purpose, and order. In each comparison, patterns of eating described in biblical laws and narratives will be contrasted with those emerging from Graeco-Roman stories and customs.
The dietary regulations in Deuteronomy 14 within its literary context
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 2002
A structural analysis of Deuteronomy 14:1-21 indicates a well planned composition. A comparison with the same set of dietary regulations in Leviticus 11:2-20 indicates a process of literary growth in the Deuteronomy composition. An original list of land animals was extended into a literary unit on dietary regulations. A technique of inclusio was used in different literary layers to form thisunit and to include it in the Deuteronomic Code and eventually in the Pentateuch. Different theories on Pentateuchal growth are considered so as to understand the ethical meaning of these dietary regulations within this larger literary framework.
2010b: Review of Nathan MacDonald, What did the Ancient Israelite Eat? Diet in biblical Time
SBL Reviews, 2010
From bits left over from another study (Not Bread Alone: The Uses of Food in the Old Testament [Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008]), MacDonald has concocted a tasty and satisfying meal. Although not a large volume (156 pages), it covers the issue of diet in "biblical times" from several perspectives. The book holds fifteen chapters in four parts, with notes and three indexes (modern names; selected place names, authors, and subjects; and scripture references) following the main text.
DavarLogos, 2019
Early Christianity attitude to biblical dietary laws is a puzzling issue. On one hand, they considered as binding the dietary laws in Leviticus 17,10-14 and then reissued in the apostolic decree. On the other hand, they considered as non-binding the dietary laws of Leviticus 11. Why did they reject the dietary laws of Leviticus 11? This article contends that the rejection of these laws was driven by the desire to distance Christianity from Judaism and not by theological reasons. This is evident in the study of the reception history of Leviticus 11 dietary laws, along with the reception history of common used text to support the non-validity of Leviticus 11 dietary laws and the role played by the food as an identity marker. When these approaches are taken together, a picture appears: the rejection of Leviticus 11 dietary laws is based on the Jewishness of these laws not the theology behind them.