Effect of simvastatin on castration-resistant prostate cancer cells (original) (raw)

Comparative effects of high and low-dose simvastatin on prostate epithelial cells: The role of LDL

European Journal of Pharmacology, 2011

Epidemiological studies have linked statin use with a decreased risk of advanced prostate cancer and an improved recurrence-free survival after radical therapy. It is unclear, however, whether statins could have direct effects against prostate cancer in a clinical setting, as their growth-inhibiting effects on prostate cancer cells have been demonstrated at drug concentrations which exceed the level in plasma during standard clinical dosing. We compared responses to high-dose and therapeutic-dose simvastatin in normal and cancerous prostate epithelial cells. Simvastatin was more effective at inhibiting the growth of normal prostate epithelial cells than of cancer cells. At therapeutic 100 nM concentration simvastatin had a cytostatic effect on normal cells: apoptosis was only slightly induced, but a decrease in cell cycle activity and an increase in senescence were observed. At therapeutic concentrations, lipophilic simvastatin caused a stronger growth inhibition than did hydrophilic rosuvastatin. In contrast, 10 μM simvastatin had a cytotoxic effect both on normal and cancer cells. Addition of LDL-cholesterol effectively reversed the cytostatic effect in all cell lines, but overcoming the cytotoxicity of 10 μM simvastatin required a combination of LDL-cholesterol and mevalonate. As LDLcholesterol completely prevented the growth-inhibiting effect of therapeutic-dose simvastatin already at low, subphysiological concentrations it is unlikely that statins have direct effects on growth of prostate epithelial cells in vivo. Statins' possible benefits against prostate cancer could be due to systemic cholesterollowering, as suggested by epidemiological studies. Future clinical studies evaluating the effects of statins on prostate cancer prevention should monitor serum LDL and should probably administer statins at higher concentrations than those currently used in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia.

Differential Effects of Pravastatin and Simvastatin on the Growth of Tumor Cells from Different Organ Sites

PLoS ONE, 2011

3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) inhibitors, commonly known as statins, may possess cancer preventive and therapeutic properties. Statins are effective suppressors of cholesterol synthesis with a well-established riskbenefit ratio in cardiovascular disease prevention. Mechanistically, targeting HMGCR activity primarily influences cholesterol biosynthesis and prenylation of signaling proteins. Pravastatin is a hydrophilic statin that is selectively taken up by a sodium-independent organic anion transporter protein-1B1 (OATP1B1) exclusively expressed in liver. Simvastatin is a hydrophobic statin that enters cells by other mechanisms. Poorly-differentiated and well-differentiated cancer cell lines were selected from various tissues and examined for their response to these two statins. Simvastatin inhibited the growth of most tumor cell lines more effectively than pravastatin in a dose dependent manner. Poorly-differentiated cancer cells were generally more responsive to simvastatin than well-differentiated cancer cells, and the levels of HMGCR expression did not consistently correlate with response to statin treatment. Pravastatin had a significant effect on normal hepatocytes due to facilitated uptake and a lesser effect on prostate PC3 and colon Caco-2 cancer cells since the OATP1B1 mRNA and protein were only found in the normal liver and hepatocytes. The inhibition of cell growth was accompanied by distinct alterations in mitochondrial networks and dramatic changes in cellular morphology related to cofilin regulation and loss of p-caveolin. Both statins, hydrophilic pravastatin and hypdrophobic simvastatin caused redistribution of OATP1B1 and HMGCR to perinuclear sites. In conclusion, the specific chemical properties of different classes of statins dictate mechanistic properties which may be relevant when evaluating biological responses to statins.

Oral simvastatin administration delays castration-resistant progression and reduces intratumoral steroidogenesis of LNCaP prostate cancer xenografts

Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2015

BACKGROUND: Growing evidence supports the idea that de novo steroidogenesis has an important role in prostate cancer's progression to the castration-resistant state following androgen deprivation therapy. Therefore, reducing the availability of cholesterol for use as a precursor in androgen synthesis may reduce proliferation and disease progression. METHODS: LNCaP xenograft-bearing mice were castrated and administered simvastatin via diet, and tumor volume and PSA concentration were monitored for 8 weeks post castration. Levels of serum and intratumoral androgens along with serum simvastatin and common toxicity markers were measured at end point. RESULTS: Reduced post-castration tumor growth rate in simvastatin-treated mice correlated with delayed time to castrationresistant progression, determined by two serum PSA doublings from post-castration nadir, when compared with xenografts in mice on control diet. At 8 weeks post castration, serum simvastatin levels were comparable to clinically relevant human doses with no evidence of overt muscle or liver toxicity. This suppressed post-castration tumor growth in the simvastatin diet group was correlated with reduced intratumoral testosterone and dihydrotestosterone levels. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced tumor growth and intratumoral androgen levels observed in simvastatin-treated, castrated mice harboring LNCaP xenograft suggests that suppressing de novo steroidogenesis can delay castration-resistant progression of this tumor model.

Effects of simvastatin, acetylsalicylic acid, and rosiglitazone on proliferation of normal and cancerous prostate epithelial Cells at therapeutic concentrations

The Prostate, 2009

BACKGROUND. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cholesterol-lowering statins have been reported to inhibit prostate cancer cell growth suggesting their chemopreventive potential within the prostate. However, the effect has been demonstrated only with advanced prostate cancer cell lines and with drug concentrations above the clinical therapeutic range. In this study we compared the effect of therapeutic concentrations of acetylsalicylic acid, simvastatin and rosiglitazone on the growth of a set of prostatic primary cultures and various prostate epithelial cell lines. METHODS. Two primary epithelial cell lines isolated from surgical resecates of normal prostate tissue (P96E, P97E), a primary cell line isolated from untreated prostate carcinoma (ESTO1), two transformed prostate epithelial cell lines (PWR1-E, RWPE-1) and advanced cancer cell lines LNCaP and VCaP were used in the study. Cells were treated for seven days with therapeutic concentrations of acetylsalisylic acid, simvastatin, rosiglitazone or their combination. Cellular growth rate was measured by crystal violet staining method. RESULTS. Acetylsalicylic acid (0.5 mM) and simvastatin (10 nM) inhibited the growth of prostate epithelial cells of normal and primary cancer origin, whereas advanced cancer cell lines were resistant to the effect. Rosiglitazone at the therapeutic level of 1 mM did not reduce the growth of any cell type studied. CONCLUSIONS. Our results demonstrate that acetylsalicylic acid and simvastatin inhibit prostate epithelial cell growth at clinically relevant doses. This should be acknowledged when designing possible prostate cancer chemopreventive trials.

The effect of simvastatin on lipid droplets accumulation in human embryonic kidney cells and pancreatic cancer cells

Lipids in Health and Disease, 2013

Background: Statins (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors) represent a major class of compounds for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia due to their ability to inhibit de novo cholesterol synthesis. In addition to their hypolipidemic effects, chemoprotective properties have been attributed to statins as well. These effects involve multiple mechanisms, which, however, are not known in detail. The aim of our study was to assess in non-malignant as well as cancer cells the impact of simvastatin on the amount of cytosolic lipid droplets (LDs) implicated in many biological processes including proliferation, inflammation, carcinogenesis, apoptosis, necrosis or growth arrest. Methods: Human embryonic kidney cells HEK-293T and human pancreatic cancer cells MiaPaCa-2 were treated with simvastatin (6 and 12 μM) for 24 and 48 hours respectively. Neutral lipid probe Nile Red was used for detection of LDs by fluorescence microscopy. Cellular cholesterol content was determined by HPLC. Changes in expression of genes related to lipid metabolism in simvastatin-treated MiaPaCa-2 cells were examined by DNA microarray analysis. Validation of gene expression changes was performed using quantitative RT-PCR. Results: The treatment of the cells with simvastatin increased their intracellular content of LDs in both non-malignant as well as cancer cells, partially due to the uptake of cholesterol and triacylglyceroles from medium; but in particular, due to enhanced synthesis of triacylglyceroles as proved by significant overexpression of genes related to de novo synthesis of triacylglyceroles and phospholipids. In addition, simvastatin also markedly influenced expression of genes directly affecting cell proliferation and signaling. Conclusions: Simvastatin treatment led to accumulation of cytosolic LDs within the examined cells, a phenomenon which might contribute to the antiproliferative effects of statins.

Statin derivatives as therapeutic agents for castration-resistant prostate cancer

Cancer Letters, 2016

Despite recent advances in modern medicine, castration-resistant prostate cancer remains an incurable disease. Subpopulations of prostate cancer cells develop castration-resistance by obtaining the complete steroidogenic ability to synthesize androgens from cholesterol. Statin derivatives, such as simvastatin, inhibit cholesterol biosynthesis and may reduce prostate cancer incidence as well as progression to advanced, metastatic phenotype. In this study, we demonstrate novel simvastatin-related molecules SVA, AM1, and AM2 suppress the tumorigenicity of prostate cancer cell lines including androgen receptor-positive LNCaP C-81 and VCaP as well as androgen receptor-negative PC-3 and DU145. This is achieved through inhibition of cell proliferation, colony formation, and migration as well as induction of S-phase cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis.

Inhibition of cholesterol biosynthesis overcomes enzalutamide resistance in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)

Journal of Biological Chemistry

Enzalutamide, a nonsteroidal second-generation antiandrogen, has been recently approved for the management of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Although patients can benefit from enzalutamide at the beginning of this therapy, acquired enzalutamide resistance usually occurs within a short period. This motivated us to investigate the mechanism involved and possible approaches for overcoming enzalutamide resistance in CRPC. In the present study, we found that 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR), a crucial enzyme in the mevalonate pathway for sterol biosynthesis, is elevated in enzalutamide-resistant prostate cancer cell lines. HMGCR knockdown could resensitize these cells to the drug, and HMGCR overexpression conferred resistance to it, suggesting that aberrant HMGCR expression is an important enzalutamide-resistance mechanism in prostate cancer cells. Furthermore, enzalutamide-resistant prostate cancer cells were more sensitive to statins, which are HMGCR inhibitors. Of note, a combination of simvastatin and enzalutamide significantly inhibited the growth of enzalutamide-resistant prostate cancer cells in vitro and tumors in vivo. Mechanistically, simvastatin decreased protein levels of the androgen receptor (AR), which was further reduced in combination with enzalutamide. We observed that the decrease in AR may occur through simvastatin-mediated inhibition of the mTOR pathway, whose activation was associated with increased HMGCR and AR expression. These results indicate that simvastatin enhances the efficacy of enzalutamide-based therapy, highlighting the therapeutic potential of statins to overcome enzalutamide resistance in CRPC.

Effect of atorvastatin, simvastatin, and lovastatin on the metabolism of cholesterol and triacylglycerides in HepG2 cells

Biochemical Pharmacology, 2001

We evaluated the effects of the hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (HMGRI) atorvastatin, lovastatin, and simvastatin on lipid homeostasis in HepG2 cells. The drugs were almost equally effective in inhibiting cholesterol synthesis and in decreasing cellular cholesterol. Atorvastatin and lovastatin increased low-density lipoprotein receptor mRNA (2.5-fold at 3 ϫ 10 Ϫ7 M) and the transcription rate at the promoter of the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene (Ͼ5-fold at 10 Ϫ6 M). The three compounds enhanced the activity of the low-density lipoprotein receptor at a similar magnitude (1.6-2.1-fold at 10 Ϫ6 M). Atorvastatin and lovastatin increased the nuclear form of sterol regulatory element binding protein (SREBP)-2, but not of SREBP-1. Each of the drugs increased triacylglyceride synthesis (50% at 10 Ϫ7-10 Ϫ6 M), cellular triacylglyceride content (16% at 10 Ϫ6 M), and expression of fatty acid synthase by reporter gene and Northern blot analysis (2-fold and 2.7-fold at 10 Ϫ6 M and 3 ϫ 10 Ϫ7 M, respectively). All compounds reduced the secretion of apo B (30% at 3 ϫ 10 Ϫ7 M). HMGRI decreased the ratio of cholesterol to apo B in newly synthesised apo B containing particles by ϳ50% and increased the ratio of triacylglycerides to apo B by ϳ35%. We conclude that regulatory responses to HMGRI are mediated by SREBP-2 rather than by SREBP-1, that HMGRI oppositely affect the cellular cholesterol and triacylglyceride production, that HMGRI moderately decrease the release of apo B containing particles, but profoundly alter their composition, and that atorvastatin does not significantly differ from other HMGRI in these regards.

Downregulation of ABCA1 and ABCG1 transporters by simvastatin in cholangiocarcinoma cells

Oncology Letters, 2019

Disturbances in cholesterol homeostasis of the bile duct epithelium, including transport interruption and the hyperaccumulation of intracellular cholesterol can lead to the initiation and progression of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Statins, which are lipid-lowering drugs, have been previously documented to exhibit anti-cancer properties. The role of statins in CCA cell cholesterol transport through the expression and function of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) A1 and ABCG1 was investigated in the current study. In four CCA cell lines, ABCA1 and ABCG1 expression was identified. However, neither ABCG5 nor ABCG8 expression was observed. Immunocytochemistry revealed that the expression of ABCA1 was localized in the proximity of the nucleus, while ABCG1 was more dispersed throughout the cytoplasm of KKU-100 cells. A cholesterol efflux assay was performed using bodipy cholesterol, and the translocation of cholesterol via ABCA1 and ABCG1 to Apo-A1 and high density lipoprotein was confirmed, respectively. Simvastatin and atorvastatin demonstrated the inhibitory effects on CCA cell viability. A reduction in intracellular lipid level and a lower expression of ABCA1 and ABCG1 were observed in KKU-100 cells under simvastatin treatment. The pre-exposure of KKU-100 cells to cholesterol diminished the statin effect. Furthermore, when KKU-100 cells were pre-loaded with cholesterol, ABCA1 and ABCG1-mediated exports were unaffected even though they were treated with simvastatin. The results of the current study indicated the limitations of the use of statin in CCA therapy, particularly under hypercholesterolemia conditions.

Anti-Tumor Effects of Simvastatin on UMR-106 Osteosarcoma Cell Line

2011

Statins have been widely used for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia and other cardiovascular diseases. Recently, statins have been studied for their apoptotic effects which make them relevant for cancer prevention and treatment; however, their exact mechanisms of action are still unclear. In this study, we used malignant UMR-106 osteosarcoma cells and normal HTR8/SVneo extravillous trophoblast cells, and found that simvastatin decreases cell viability, in a dose and time-dependent manner in both cell types. In addition, 10 µM simvastatin was able to induce apoptosis in trophoblast cells as evaluated by FACS analysis. Finally, proteomic analysis of protein expression suggests a specific regulatory mechanism that could explain some of the anticancer effects of this statin.