Nietzsche’s Daybreak (original) (raw)

Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy, 2008

Abstract

Any interpretation of Nietzsche's criticisms of morality must show whether or not Nietzsche is entitled both to deny free will and to be concerned with furthering human freedom. Here I will show that Nietzsche is entitled to both claims if his theory of freedom is set in the context of a naturalistic drive-psychology. The drive-psychology allows Nietzsche to develop a modified but recognizable account of freedom as autonomy. I situate this development in Nietzsche's thought through a close reading of Daybreak (Morgenrote). In conclusion I contrast Nietzsche's naturalistic account of autonomy with the transcendental account developed by Kant.

Carl Sachs hasn't uploaded this paper.

Let Carl know you want this paper to be uploaded.

Ask for this paper to be uploaded.