A State of Delusion: Nazi-Deutsch and the Discursive Manipulation of the Third Reich (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Language of the Third Reich, 2022
This paper will closely analyse certain words which were made prominent in the years of National Socialism in Germany. The word “Volksgemeinschaft” will be taken specifically and analysed throughout different mediums used by NSDAP (Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei), specifically an indoctrinated newspaper (Völkischer Beobachter), the famous director of Triumph of the Will (Triumph des Willens), Leni Riefenstahl, speeches by Hitler and his Minister of Propaganda, Joseph Goebbels. Throughout these mediums, most of the time, the words “Volk” (Nation, People), “Gemeinschaft” (Society),” Volksgenossen” (Comrade*s) are used synonymously or as an ideological equivalent for “Volksgemeinschaft.” Therefore, I aim to clarify how the ideology of national socialism have transformed and manipulated these words and how “Volksgemeinschaft” served as an umbrella term for an ideology and abovementioned words. I aim to connect the events and phenomena with certain media theories, for instance, Lasswell’s chain of communication and propaganda technique, Barthes’ “Myth”, and several behavioural media theories and linguistic theories from Saussure, analysis of semiotics, and with the help of two main sources, namely, Helmut Plessner’s The Limits of Community, to clarify the ideology of social radicalism, hence national socialism and spot the similarities, and The Language of the Third Reich by Victor Klemperer to gaze into the German society of II. World War, how did the ideology affected the public.
The Radicalism of the Banality of Evil: Ideology and Political Conformity in Arendt
New German Critique, 2019
The article reexamines Hannah Arendt’s shift from “radical evil” in The Origins of Totalitarianism to “the banality of evil” in Eichmann in Jerusalem and subsequent writings. At the heart of this shift stands Arendt’s realization that she exaggerated the role of ideology in motivating ordinary people to become mass murderers. Instead, political conformity—namely, self-adjustment to the ruling political order simply because it is the ruling order—becomes Arendt’s main explanation for the participation of “ordinary people” in the Nazi mass murder. This shift in Arendt’s interpretation is truly radical, and its implications require further consideration and investigation.
Język a Kultura, 2019
Propaganda as a weapon and a tool of totalitarian power: The image of the concept in the common discourse of the war and occupation years 1939–1945The author of the article describes the ways of conceptualizing Nazi totalitarian propaganda during the Second World War 1939–1945 in occupied Poland. This totalitarian discourse created many defense mechanisms on the level of colloquial knowledge, humor directed against the occupant, and was the object of counter-propaganda activities conducted by Polish underground organizations. This article describes a fragment of the “anti-totalitarian discourse” that emerges from the diaries and journals of the period described.
The Nazi Regime—Ideology, Ascendancy, and Consensus
Understanding Willing Participants, Volume 2, 2018
In this chapter, Russell delineates the Nazi regime’s construction and promulgation of an ideology that saw many ordinary and mildly antisemitic Germans condone or feel indifferent about the infliction of harm on Jews and other “sub-humans.” Much like the Obedience study’s persuasion phase (see Volume 1), Russell argues that the Nazi regime ensured that Germany’s “informational and social field” underwent a “calculated restructuring.” A key consequence of this indoctrination process for many Germans was that the harming of certain others was morally inverted into a social good.
Totalitarianism, Arendt, and the Indictment of the Social Sciences
In the Nazi concentration camp of Theresienstadt, around 150 people rebelled against the Nazis not through violence of attempts to escape but with music. Musical conductor Rafael Scachter brought all the people together using merely his memory and a single piano in a dark basement of the camp, and in singing Verdi’s Requieum, reached a level of excellence that even the Nazis themselves permitted the music (Bor, et al., 1963) (Manivannan, 2016). The Terezin Requiem is one of the most touching tails of resistance against the Nazis, for the fact that the concentration camps weren’t merely focused upon destroying the physical aspect of the person, but rather the cultural and historical aspect as well. As Peter Baehr puts it, while speaking of Hannah Arendt’s views, “…concentration camps sought to swallow people into “holes of oblivion” and eliminate traces of their ever having existed.” (Baehr, 2010) It was in 1950 that Hannah Arendt finally became a citizen of the United States, and it was also that year that she began meeting and developing a romance with Martin Heidegger once again. Hannah Arendt having been a Jew and in Germany for a long period of her life, not merely wrote of her objective ideas but rather funneled her personal experiences into her writing. It was in the same year 1950 that she wrote her seminal work titled Social Science Techniques and the Study of Concentration Camps (Arendt, 1950). She stated critiques of the social sciences and removed key assumptions that the discipline held about the utilitarian, functionalist, and self-interest driven elements of human nature with respect to totalitarianism and concentration camps. This paper will provide an account of the arguments that she provided with regards to the limitations of social science techniques, with the context of the extermination of Jews in concentration camps in Nazi Germany. The paper will begin with certain key definitions and proceed to delineate the various arguments of Hannah Arendt.