Social identity and the perception of history: cultural representations of Aotearoa/New Zealand (original) (raw)
1999, European Journal of Social Psychology
The context of intergroup relations in Aotearoa/New Zealand was investigated using perceptions of history by Maori (Polynesian-descended) and Pakeha (Europeandescended) samples from university and the general public. There was strong consensus that the Treaty of Waitangi was the most important event in New Zealand's history, but only Maori, the subordinate ethnic group, showed in-group favouritism in their judgments regarding the Treaty. Pakeha, the dominant group, showed outgroup favouritism, and distanced themselves from past injustices using linguistic strategies. Maori students showed interest in their ethnic origins (ontogeny), rating the distant past and Polynesian history higher, and free-recalling more events prior to European arrival than other groups; Maori in the general population shared a more similar perception of history to Pakeha. Both in-group favouritism and ontogeny were found in sentencecompletion choices. Historical perceptions were strongly related to positions on current political issues. Results are related to social identity theory, social representations theory, and social dominance theory.
Related papers
Identity and alternative version of the past in New Zealand
My name is Barry Brailsford Ko Tuhua te maunga My mountain is Tuhua Ko Mawhera te awa My river is Mawhera Ko Te Aka Aka o Poutini te marae My marae [meeting place] is Te Aka Aka o Poutini Ko Rakaihautu te tupuna My tupuna [ancestor] is Rakaihautu Ko Waitaha te iwi My iwi [tribe] is Waitaha. (Brailsford 1995:9)
Social indicators research, 2011
New Zealand (NZ) Europeans show a unique implicit bicultural effect, with research using the Implicit Association Test consistently showing that they associate Maori (the Indigenous peoples) and their own dominant/advantaged majority) group as equally representative of the nation. We replicated and extended this NZ = bicultural effect in a small online national sample of Maori and NZ Europeans. The NZ European majority showed a consistent NZ = bicultural effect. Maori, in contrast, showed an automatic ingroup NZ = Maori effect. These results are contrary to predictions derived from Social Identity Theory and System Justification Theory, and instead seem more consistent with a model incorporating the pervasive effects of culture-specific symbols on automatic representations of the national category.
Collective (white) Memories of Māori Language Loss (or not)
Language Awareness, 2015
Language policies have a better chance of succeeding if they align with the persuasions of the polity, and this is only more pronounced in the case of endangered languages, such as Te Reo (the Māori language) in New Zealand. There, a comprehensive suite of laws, policies, and programmes are in place to acknowledge and reverse the linguistic consequences of British colonisation and previous laws of linguistic assimilation. However, this history and benevolent rationale are generally hidden in policy documents and only implied in public discourse. Drawing on the findings of a large-scale qualitative online survey that obtained folk linguistic knowledge and beliefs about language revitalisation in New Zealand, this paper identifies whether non-indigenous youth claim Te Reo is or is not endangered, and analyses the diachronic and synchronic sociolinguistic reasoning these youth use to arrive at their claims. In doing so, the paper also draws on collective memory theory in sociology to especially consider whether, and to what extent, the folk linguistic commentary of these non-indigenous youth sustains a collective memory of Te Reo language loss at the hands of colonial Pākeha forefathers.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.