Finding the Truth in A Virtual Courtroom: Criminal Trials in Indonesia during the COVID-19 (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Effectiveness Of Criminal Judges Virtually (Online) During The Covid-19 Pandemic In Court
Proceeding of International Conference on The Law Development For Public Welfare, 2021
The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the effectiveness of the virtual criminal justice process in the Covid-19 pandemic conditions on the workings of the criminal justice system in the courts.. This study uses a normative juridical approach. Based on the research, it can be concluded that the practice of online trial, known in the Supreme Court as e-Litigation, will not be effective if Act No. 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) does not change. The principle of the presence of the defendant (in absentia) in the Criminal Procedure Code is contrary to the practice of elitigation, if e-litigation is applied to criminal cases. Meanwhile, the Circular Letter of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2020 does not allow criminal cases to be examined through the e-Litigation application. These things cause the implementation of online court proceedings in Indonesia to not be effective, where regulatory developments are stagnant and there is disharmony between regulations. If the stakeholders do not immediately address, then this problem will cause quite complicated and complex problems in the future. On the other hand, conducting online trials is the only way out during the Covid-19 pandemic so that the settlement of criminal cases under the Supreme Court does not stop.
The Legality of Virtual Trials in the Indonesian Criminal Law System
International Journal of Social Science Research and Review
The existence of this pandemic certainly has an impact on several things, one of which is in the legal realm, namely trials that are conducted virtually or online. Therefore, in this paper, we will discuss the implementation of virtual trials in Indonesian criminal law with several problem formulations, namely how the mechanism is carried out in the application of virtual court law in overcoming all criminal problems that exist in Indonesia, then in this study will discuss about What legal basis underlies the implementation of this virtual trial in Indonesia when examined in the Indonesian criminal law system. This research uses a qualitative normative legal research type. Normative legal research is a legal research conducted in a way such as conducting research on library materials or secondary data. In this research, law is often conceptualized as something that is written in legislation or as a norm which is a benchmark for human activities that are considered appropriate. The r...
‘Virtual Court’ in the Perspective of Criminal Procedure Code
International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 2020
Introduction The domino effect of the increasingly widespread outbreak of Corona Virus Disease2019 (called COVID-19) which was established as a global pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) on March 11, 2020 has changed the pattern of how human think, behave, and act, not only in social interaction, but also in the law enforcement system. The criminal law enforcement sector is transformed to look for the right formulations and vaccines so that the principles of 'social distancing' and 'physical distancing,' which are expected to break the chain of the spread of COVID-19, can be implemented in criminal proceedings. To break the chain of the spread of COVID-19, the practice of criminal justice is forced to 'flex' its perspective on procedural law by allowing the 'virtual' presence of judicial instruments, namely Judges, Registrars, Prosecutors, Witnesses, Experts, Defendants, and Legal Counselors to replace the 'physical' presence. It is as stated in the Letter of the Director General of the General Court of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number:379/DJU/PS.00/3/2020 dated 27 March 2020 and the Circular of the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia Number: B-049/A/SEJA/03/2020 dated 27 March 2020. They allow the remote criminal trial through video conference/teleconference. Responding to these legal instruments, several work units of the District Attorney and District Courts in Indonesia implement 'virtual' criminal trial using video conferencing/teleconferences. As a result, from 30 to 31 March 2020, there has been 1,509 (one thousand five hundred and nine) criminal cases were proceeded 'virtually' simultaneously in Indonesia. 1 The video conference/teleconference of criminal trial makes the judiciary, namely judges, clerks, prosecutors, witnesses, experts, defendants, and legal advisors, not involved in direct contact because they are in different place.
Evaluation of The Fulfillment of The Defendant's Rights in Online Criminal Proceedings in Indonesia
Jurnal Hukum Sasana
In early 2020, Indonesia was hit by the Corona Virus that affect all aspects in public live including affect judicial institutions. Criminal proceedings that supposed to be held in a trial that open to the public according to the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code, must be held online in which judges, prosecutor, lawyer, and the defendant are in separate places. Even though, the Indonesian Supreme Court have enacted Circular Letter No. 1 Year 2020 to regulate the proceedings during the Covid-19 pandemic, many criticisms for the course of online trials especially regarding the rights of the defendants, which were violated during the online trial. The rights of the defendant who were violated during the online criminal trial were the right to be heard equally, right to consult with a lawyer during the proceedings of the case, right to be tried without undue delay, and right to present witnesses and experts and ask questions to these witnesses and experts. These rights, that was feared...
Bridging the Distance: The Use of Videoconferencing Technology in Corruption Courts in Indonesia
Nova Publishing, 2021
Criminal law enforcement in Indonesia, particularly in corruption cases, faces the challenge of high operation costs due to delays in the trial process occasioned by the absence of witnesses. Court delays jeopardize the defendant’s right to an expeditious trial and also hamper society’s need for a speedy and lawful conviction. As an old aphorism says, “justice delayed is justice denied.” The choice on whether to delay the court to obtain witness testimony as evidence or to protect witnesses from being examined in court is a complicated legal matter for law enforcement officers, more especially for judges and prosecutors tasked with ensuring that the justice system is efficient and fair. Fortunately, video conferencing technology has created a viable solution to this challenge. Judges and public prosecutors now have the option of addressing the issue of witness testimony by applying video conferencing technology. In practice, witness testimony provided through video conferencing is accepted depending on the circumstances and facts of the case. However, from the theoretical aspect, there is still intense debate over the validity of a testimony given through video conferencing. This chapter attempts to discuss the legal issues in using video conferencing to obtain evidence in Indonesia’s Special Court for Corruption. It employs a doctrinal research methodology, which includes legal principles and concepts, with a special emphasis on case law and regulations. The findings of this research show that remote witness testimony, mainly obtained through video conferencing technology, should be acknowledged as admissible evidence in Indonesian corruption courts. The use of video conferencing does not conflict with the process of cross- examination, which is a crucial prerequisite in validating witness testimony in criminal cases. Furthermore, the adoption of video conferencing technology in court hearings facilitates the implementation of trials in an efficient, expeditious, and affordable manner, which is also one of the important principles of criminal procedure law in Indonesia. It is expected that this research will provide additional knowledge to enforcement officers, the community, and also scholars interested in criminal procedure law.
International Journal for Court Administration
The Covid-19 pandemic has changed all aspects of people's lives, starting from social, political and economic conditions, but not in the world of justice. Because the judicial process must continue to ensure access to justice for justice seekers, as a judicial institution, the Indonesian constitutional court will undoubtedly continue to provide justice through various methods of digital acceleration. Several accelerations successfully developed by the court include online trials, online application submissions, online decisions, and copies of decisions that can be downloaded on the website. This article will discuss how the court provides justice during the Covid-19 pandemic. Interestingly, filing requests for judicial review experienced a significant increase during 2020-2022, even though the Covid-19 pandemic was hitting the world. During that period, the court decided several times on exceptional cases restoring society's sense of justice.
Indonesian Criminal Law Procedure Paradigm Shift: Establishing the Virtual Criminal Court
Nurani Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2021
Indonesia, like other countries in the world, struggles as pandemic strikes. Such condition force every subject involved in the criminal justice system to administer technology to suppress the spread of the virus by social distancing. However, the sudden turn to employ modern technology has made the justice system moved into a new place called the virtual court. This pandemic situation also forces the shift of the conventional criminal court to the virtual criminal court paradigm. This article discusses the history of virtual criminal court in Indonesian Criminal Justice. This research employs a descriptive-normative method. The information collected by applying a historical approach and theoretical approach. Relevant data then studied and evaluated. The result then explained and described clearly. Indonesia is ready to implement virtual criminal justice. The shift from formal criminal court proceeding into virtual criminal court proceeding is applicable in Indonesia since 2002.
Zooming In: Courtrooms and Defendants’ Rights during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Social & Legal Studies
COVID-19 placed unprecedented strains on criminal court systems, necessitating moves to digital platforms with little preparation. To study the influence of virtual courtrooms on defendant rights (e.g. effective assistance of counsel, speedy and public trials, among others), we qualitatively analyzed the journals of 44 student court watchers, documenting their observations of online court proceedings in a single state in the Northeastern United States. We find that virtual courtrooms are highly disorganized and fraught with technical malfunctions, compromising defendants’ appearances online, and impeding their ability to confer with counsel and address the court. Defendants with less access to digital platforms and incarcerated individuals are disproportionately impacted. Further, court actors tend to treat virtual court in a casual manner and are often unprepared to litigate cases, resulting in undue delays, and extended periods of pre-trial detention. Policy recommendations to imp...
Virtual Trials: Necessity, Invention, and the Evolution of the Courtroom
SSRN Electronic Journal
Faith in the legitimating power of the live hearing or trial performed at the place of justice is at least as old as the Iliad. In public courtrooms, litigants appear together, evidence is presented, and decisions are openly and formally pronounced. The bedrock belief in the importance of the courtroom is rooted in common law, constitutional guarantees, and venerated tradition, as well as in folk knowledge. Courtrooms are widely believed to imbue adjudication with "a mystique of authenticity and legitimacy." The COVID-19 pandemic, however, by compelling legal systems throughout the world to turn from physical courtrooms to virtual ones, disrupts and calls into question longstanding assumptions about the conditions essential for the delivery of justice. These questions are not merely tangential; they implicate many of the core beliefs undergirding the U.S. system of justice, including the whole notion of "a day in court" as the promise of a synchronous, physically situated event with a live audience. Rather than †Susan A.
Evidence Problems in Criminal Cases Online Trials during the Covid-19 Pandemic
2020
Since the Covid-19 outbreak, in a very decisive few months, law enforcement agencies agreed to hold online criminal proceedings. The Memorandum of Understanding between the Supreme Court, the Attorney General's Office, the Police, and the Directorate General (Ditjen) of Corrections on the Implementation of Criminal Case Sessions through Video Conferences. This research uses normative or doctrinal legal research. Normative legal research is meant to study and examine legal norms in the Criminal Procedure Code and other statutory regulations the norms contained in it. The results showed that the drafting of regulations on the standardization of court facilities and infrastructure in the district court was to improve the quality of the implementation of courageous trials. Limited facilities and infrastructure, such as limited courtrooms with video teleconferencing devices and unstable internet networks, have caused delays in the trial process because the postponement of the trial c...