Thomas Heine Nielsen 2006, Book Review of David J. Phillips and David M. Pritchard 2003 (eds.), Sport and Festival in the Ancient Greek World, Swansea (Classical Press of Wales), Bryn Mawr Classical Review July, no. 51. (original) (raw)

The genesis of the present collection of articles dates back to 2000, when a conference on the theme of "Olympia and the Olympics: Festival and Identity in the Ancient World" formed a part of the "cultural lead-up to the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games" (x). As the editors note (xxv n. 59), the modern Olympics traditionally generate books etc. on the ancient Olympics and so, if nothing else, at least ensure some regularity of public attention to matters ancient. Not all the contributions, however, originate from the symposium; those of e.g. Miller and Crowther were commissioned after the event "to fill out the book's treatment of key topics and themes" (xv). As published, the volume's stated aim is to explore in detail the cultural, religious, political and social significance in the archaic and classical Greek world of athletics and festivals as well as how sporting and musical competitions "led the way, throughout the archaic period, in the crystallization and development of the polis and in the creation of its juridical and political practices" (xv). That, indeed, is a very ambitious undertaking but in fact some of the contributions, such as e.g. those of Ben Brown and Peter Wilson, tackle these issues directly.

T.H. Nielsen, A Note on the Number of Events in Classical Greek Athletics

This note demonstrates that during the archaic period a reduction in the number of events featured at Greek athletic festivals took place and produced the agon gymnikos, which was essentially similar to the program at Olympia. It goes on to ask how this reduction came about and suggests that it was caused by the influential and prestigious Olympic model as well as by the intense peer polity interaction of Greek culture. It ends by briefly hinting at some of the advantages of the fact that the agon gymnikos was basically the same all over the Greek world.

An essay on the extent and significance of the Greek athletic culture in the classical period

2014

Most people know that in antiquity, as in our day, the Olympics were celebrated every four years. Most classicists know that in antiquity the Olympics were not the only major athletic festival in existence, but formed a part of the famous periodos (“tour”, “circuit”), a series of four athletic festivals which were scheduled with an eye to each other in such a way that every year saw one or two celebrations of games in this most prestigious group of festivals.1

Thomas Heine Nielsen, "Some Basic Aspects of Panhellenic Games and Festivals in the Late-Archaic and Classical Period"

EClás 164 (2023-2), pp. 65-88, 2023

This essay deals with the meaning of the term "panhellenic" in its use in a sporting context, considering why the term is reserved in modern scholarship to designate the four great sporting festivals of ancient Greece (the Olympic, Pythian, Isthmian and Nemean Games). It is an inescapable conclusion that the basic characteristics of the Panhellenic athletic festivals (their inclusion as spectacles into religious festivals, their acceptance of all comers, the events program, the complex competitions announcement system) are not exclusive to these four festivals but shared with numerous other festivals. So, the Panhellenic festivals were simply the most conspicuous examples of a rather common Greek institution, the athletic festival. The crowds that attended the Games, and the ambitions and motivations of the athletes when participating, are also considered.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.