Improving OO design process using rules, patterns and refactoring (original) (raw)
Related papers
OBJECT ORIENTED DESIGN AND ARCHITECTURE
troduction of patterns of design and architecture. Few works, however, offer methods of precise specification for O-O architectures. This article provides a well-defined ontology and an underlying framework for the formal specification of O-O architectures: We observe key regularities and elementary design motifs in O-O design and architectures; define "architectural model" in logic; and formulate relations between specifications. We demonstrate how to declare and reason with the representations. Finally, we use our conceptual toolkit to compare and evaluate proposed formalisms.
Design Patterns: Abstraction and Reuse of Object-Oriented Design
Software Pioneers, 2002
We propose design patterns as a new mechanism for expressing object-oriented design experience. Design patterns identify, name, and abstract common themes in objectoriented design. They capture the intent behind a design by i d e n tifying objects, their collaborations, and the distribution of responsibilities. Design patterns play many roles in the object-oriented development process: they provide a common vocabulary for design, they reduce system complexity b y naming and de ning abstractions, they constitute a base of experience for building reusable software, and they act as building blocks from which more complex designs can be built. Design patterns can be considered reusable micro-architectures that contribute to an overall system architecture. We describe how to express and organize design patterns and introduce a catalog of design patterns. We also describe our experience in applying design patterns to the design of object-oriented systems.
Object Oriented (OO) languages do not guarantee that a system is flexible enough to absorb future requirements, nor that its components can be reused in other contexts. This paper presents an approach to OO design expertise reuse, which is able to detect certain constructions that compromise future expansion or modification of OO systems, and suggest their replacement by more adequate ones. Both reengineering legacy systems, and systems that are still under development are considered by the approach. A tool (OOPDTool) was developed to support the approach, comprising a knowledge base of good design constructions, that correspond to heuristics and design patterns, as well as problematic constructions (i.e., anti-patterns).
Using design patterns to reveal the competence of object-oriented methods in system-level design
1999
This paper shows how Design Patterns may be used to reveal important properties of object-oriented development methods. The responsibility-driven and event-driven design methods are contrasted with a direct encoding of analysis models to show how these methods properly transform and layer systems. Each method elevates a different modularising principle: contract minimisation and existence dependency. Different design patterns, such as Mediator, Chain of Responsibility, Template Method, Command and Composite emerge for each method, illustrating the particular bias and the different design decisions each makes about subsystems and modular structure.
2015
Object-oriented design is like an alloy consisting of a solid grounding in the object-oriented (OO) approach and implementing the best OO practices heavily laced with how to sidestep the OO pitfalls. The design process isn't only a matter of applying basic OO principles. One should go further and achieve a reasonable tradeoff between OO design principles and applicable design patterns. This article will discuss the relationship between three sources of a solid OO design and offer a starting point to understanding what is, in effect, a complex process. It will also serve as a review for experienced designers. The OO Design Pyramid When developers first turn to object-oriented development, they try to grasp the basics. It may take several project lifetimes. Getting a full sense of object orientation is a big shift in people's minds, especially for those who come from the procedural world. Such principles are like ABC books since they define the foundation of the OO world. On...
2013
In this competitive world, all enterprises depend on the IT as their active support for various purposes. As a result the software projects are becoming larger and more complex. Hence the developers face challenge of developing the complex software’s more quickly. The best solution to this is the concept of Reuse [1]. Through object oriented analysis pattern it is possible to solve the problems occurring in software development through its reusable capacity [1]. Good OO designs are reusable and stable nature, this provides the ability of this pattern to be used in Other applications which share the same knowledge[7]. Patterns show you how to build systems with good OO design qualities. The main aim of “object oriented analysis pattern ” is to provide expert solution to recurring business problem and to produce more reliable conceptual design. In this paper, we formally give an overview on the state of Object-oriented modeling using patterns and classification of analysis pattern and...
Architectural styles, design patterns, and objects
Software, IEEE, 1997
Software system builders are increasingly recognizing the importance of exploiting design knowledge in the engineering of new systems. One way to do this is to define an architectural style for a collection of related systems. The style determines a coherent vocabulary of system design elements and rules for their composition. By structuring the design space for a family of related systems a style can, in principle, drastically simplify the process of building a system, reduce costs of implementation through reusable infrastructure, and improve system integrity through style-specific analyses and checks.
Design Patterns as Litmus Paper to Test the Strength of Object-Oriented Methods
1998
This paper shows how Design Patterns may be used to reveal properties of object-oriented development methods. The responsibility-driven and event-driven design methods are contrasted in the way they transform and layer systems. Each method elevates a different modularising principle: contract minimisation and existence dependency. Different design patterns, such as Mediator, Chain of Responsibility, Template Method, Command and Composite emerge for each method, illustrating the particular bias and the different design decisions each makes.