Outsourcing Migration Management: EU, power, and the external dimension of asylum and immigration policy (original) (raw)
Related papers
EURINT, 2018
European Union's policies on migration and asylum raise double-ditched problems. In the EU, the latter's Court stated that in these areas solidarity is a binding principle: consequently, EU Member States must comply with EU decisions assigning quotas of international protection seekers to each EU State. The paper inspects also agreements between, on one hand, EU Member States (or the EU as such) and, on the other, non-EU countries as origin or transit States of international protection seekers with the view of relocating such individuals to those latter countries. This practice raises doubts if latter countries were deemed non-safe states, e.g. in case they weren't part to 1951 Geneva Convention. These issues are relevant for the development of relations between EU and its member states as well as in the perspective that EU performs its international legal personality in full compliance to international law rules on migration and human rights protection.
The External Dimension of EU Migration and Asylum Policy
2020
This online symposium is being held just before the ACES-Asser conference on 'Migration deals and their damaging effects', which will take place online on 8-9 October. The conference and the contributions in this symposium aim to examine the legal and policy implications of the increased informalisation of the EU's external action in the field of migration and asylum. The use of informal instruments in EU external relations is nothing new. At the same time, the increasing recourse to such instruments in the past few years has been a growing cause of concern over their potential detrimental effects on the rights of migrants and refugees, the EU's institutional balance, the rule of law, as well as the global regime for protection of refugees.
The External Dimension of EU Asylum Policy: Gaining Momentum or Fading Away?
ISMU Working Paper, 2015
The asylum challenge currently faced by the European Union (EU) has a clear connection with the steep increase in migration flows through the Mediterranean Sea experienced in the last couple of years. Indeed, a large proportion of migrants attempting the dangerous trip across the Mediterranean are asylum seekers, fleeing from wars and authoritarian regimes. The EU is committed to establishing a Common European Asylum System (CEAS), based on common rules and uniform standards. In this context, due to the global character of the asylum issue, the ‘external’ dimension of the CEAS is central to providing comprehensive and long-lasting solutions. Against this backdrop, this paper assesses the role of the EU as a global actor in the field of asylum. Taking as a starting point insights from the literature on EU external action, the main components that build up the external dimension of EU asylum policy are taken into account: legal competences, strategic documents, and concrete policy initiatives implemented so far. Regarding the latter aspect, three areas of action are analysed: regional protection pro- grammes, the joint EU resettlement programme, and humanitarian visas and the external pro- cessing of asylum claims. The paper concludes by highlighting Member States’ lack of political commitment, inter-institutional tensions, and the overlaps between EU and national initiatives as the main challenges to increase coherence of EU external action in the field of asylum.
The Immigration and Asylum Policy of the European Union
2016
Mass migration, as it appears in the 21st century, is one of the greatest challenges of our globalized world. The unanswered questions of European Union (EU) immigration policy that emerged over the past few decades have become more pressing than ever. One of these urgent questions is: how can we provide for a developing European economy in an era of demographic decline in a way that it is based on the opportunities opened up by legally regulated forms of migration. A second question is: how can the EU ensure the safety of the newly arriving people in need and, at the same time, keep away illegal migrants and eliminate criminal activities related to migration. The European Union is destined to spread the principles of peace and unconditional respect for human rights not only within its own borders, but also on a global scale, when engaging in international affairs. In addition to observing human rights, however, the EU must also take into account all security considerations that are...
Migration and Asylum Policy Within EU. Causes, Needs, Strategic Policy and Evolutions
Ovidius University Annals: Economic Sciences Series, 2019
A number of European structures have been and are concerned about the phenomenon of migration that has involved Europe so dynamically in recent years, being the biggest challenge in the field, after World War II. The structures we refer to have participated in managing this phenomenon of migration by: reforming EU asylum rules, discouraging irregular migration, saving lives and securing external borders, implementing a strong common asylum policy, developing the new policy on legal migration and like. Thus, we aim to investigate the most important aspects of migration and asylum, including: the specific causes and needs related to Maslow's pyramid, legal and illegal migration, the way that some of the EU institutions have contributed to the migration and asylum reform and so on.
The European Union and the externalization of asylum procedures
In a critical juncture as regards to European Union border management and frontiers control, exacerbated by a more general crisis of the international asylum seekers protection system, our brief analysis would like to highlight the attention on those policies aimed at deterring asylum seekers from reaching European Union. Analysing through an historical point of view how these policies were interpreted and applied by various member states and by the EU itself, we would open a brief parenthesis to compare the present EU agenda with three specific case studies. At the end, we will try to focus our attention on the legal feasibility of the European Union external asylum policies, hesitating on the development of external jurisdiction models. Leaving our questions opened to further clarification, we are stuck while the European Union itself would have decided a clear path toward a possible implementation of the policies described. Comparing different opinions that addresses the issue from various point of view, we came up with the idea that, at the current status of the treaties, such an approach would lead to too many uncertain developments, potentially representing a threat for human rights with the risk to see asylum seekers placed in a " legal grey zone " , ultimately bringing to a failure the any concrete protection mechanism.
THE EU FACING ASYLUM AND MIGRATION: MORE AMBITION, MORE COMPROMISE
The number of asylum seekers in 2014 was the highest since 1992, when the Bosnia-Herzegovina war began. Nowadays, the Syrian civil war, the migratory transit through the Mediterranean Sea (218.0001 economic migrants and refugees), the alarming figures of deaths, and the increasing social pressure, made the EU step forward to review the current migration and neighborhood policy framework, whilst fostering a communitarian dimension, inexistent so far.
ISMU Working Paper, 2017
The increasingly protracted character of many displacement situations worldwide has led the in- ternational community to introduce innovative approaches to durable solutions for refugees and Internally displaced persons (IDPs). Specifically, international initiatives have focused on two main areas of action: a) strengthening the nexus between humanitarian and development interventions in the context of forced displacement situations; b) introducing legal pathways to protection for refugees through resettlement and other humanitarian and non-humanitarian channels. The emerging of the above-mentioned international agenda has triggered a parallel revision of the Eu- ropean Union (EU) external action in the field of asylum and refugee protection, a process that has gained further momentum as a consequence of increasing migration and asylum flows experienced by Europe since 2014. This Working paper explores the ways in which different approaches to durable solutions have been framed at the EU level and analyses the main strategic orientations and initiatives adopted by the EU in this policy domain.