Rabbinic Authority and Community in 18th Century Germany: Moses Brandeis Levi and the Jewish Community of Mainz (original) (raw)
Related papers
This article explores early modern practices of cooking and hospitality, both in and out of homes, in the Jewish ghetto of Frankfurt am Main. The focus is on Garküchen (eateries) and communal ovens, which were increasingly regulated by the community. Communal leaders employed creative strategies to find solutions for nourishing a growing local and visiting population in the limited space of the early modern Jewish ghetto. Their attempts to expand were propelled by concrete historical events, particularly by a series of fires, which shaped the physical spaces in which this process unfolded. Looking at these institutions allows for a reconsideration of the spatial boundaries of the Jewish ghetto. On Sunday evening, March 21, 1624, around the time of the spring fair, a deadly fight broke out in the Garküche run by Gütge, the wife of Isaac Römhild zum Fisch in Frankfurt am Main. 1 This food establishment was run in Gütge's house and contained two rooms: an upstairs and a downstairs. 2 An interrogation by the city magistrates who investigated the brawl reports that on that evening, she had been serving food downstairs to a table of six men. Her nephew Yeh. iel, who helped her during the busy fair season, had been serving three full tables upstairs. 3 The table of six, all of whom were Jews foreign to Frankfurt, seemed to have been celebrating a special occasion, as one of the We would like to thank the Israel Institute of Advanced Studies, the Israel Science Foundation Grant 1802/18, and the Marie Curie Actions, EC FP7, in the frame of the EURIAS Fellowship Program, for supporting our work. 1. Institut für Stadtgeschichte Frankfurt am Main (ISG), Criminalia 609 (1624), fols. 1r-3v. 2. On Gütge, see Shlomo Ettlinger, Ele toldot [Burial Records of the Jewish Community of Frankfurt am Main] 1241-1824, n.d., http://www.lbi.org/digibaeck/results/?qtype=pid&term=258967, 15.XII.1637. Based on a tax register that is no longer extant, Ettlinger dates Gütge's Garküche to at least 1598. 3. The Lent Fair (Fastenmesse) in Frankfurt lasted for about three weeks total, from Oculi Sunday until the Friday before Palm Sunday, with some flexibility regarding its end.
The Jews of early modern Marburg, 1640s—1800
The History of the Family, 2003
This article examines Jewish household and family organization in a middle-sized German city, the Upper Hessian regional center of Marburg, the population of which ranged from 2500 to 6000 from the Thirty Years War to the end of the 18th century. Some general hypotheses about population development, household structure, and family life conveniently summarized by Toch . Aspects of stratification in early modern German Jewry: Population history and village Jews. In R. P. Hsia & H. Lehmann (Eds.). In and out of the ghetto: Jewish-Gentile relations in late medieval and early modern Germany (pp. 77-89). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press] serve as an organizational frame for the case study. In Toch's view, Jews' comparative wealth, as well as governmental restrictions on their settlement and marriage in central Europe, led to their having larger and more complex households than those of the Christian majority. While household enumerations over time confirm several of Toch's observations, especially the larger size of Jewish families, neither Hessian settlement policy nor local Marburg opposition prevented the Jewish minority of about 1% from keeping pace with general population growth. Moreover, Jews did not respond to their regulated living conditions and status as cultural outsiders with a family organization exhibiting remarkably more internal complexity than did Christian households. D
Religious Studies Review, 2013
A quick view at the title suggests that the authors took on a daunting task-to survey education and economic history of the Jews in a variety of lands over a period of almost a millennium and a half. The authors try to answer the question: How were the Jews transformed from a people of farmers to an urban population of merchants and craftsmen? The authors survey Jewish demographic history, educational history, and economic history and find an answer in the high level of literacy among Jewish men. In their opinion, this product of religious ideology had major economic results. Their conclusion is that religion had a major impact on Jewish economic and social life. In the final chapter, the authors suggest that this influence has continued until today-or almost until today. The authors are economists and not specialists in Jewish history or in demography; and thus not surprisingly, many of the claims they make in this book can be challenged.
Karl Mannheim’s Jewish Question
In this paper, we explore the puzzling failure (or refusal) on the part of the sociologist, Karl Mannheim, to address himself in any way to questions arising out of the position of Jews in Germany, either before or after the advent of Nazi rule-and this, notwithstanding the fact, first, that his own social identification as a Jew was never in question and that he shared vivid experiences of anti-Semitism, and consequent exile from both Hungary and Germany, and, second, that his entire sociological method rested upon using one's own most problematic social location-as woman, say, or youth, or intellectual-as the starting point for a reflexive investigation. A number of circumstances make it implausible to ascribe this seeming contradiction to some blanket denial of or disassociation from his own Jewish background, including his choices of residence in both Frankfurt and London, his seeming comfort with his identification as a Jewish person among colleagues and students, his abstention from any actions of disavowal, and his life-long close relations with his unquestionably self-identified Jewish parents, who outlived him in Hungary. The key to our puzzle, we believe, is to be found in a place defined by an unsurprising relation for as dedicated a teacher as Karl Mannheim: in the work of one of his students, Jacob Katz.
Considering the many attempts to defi ne what constitutes knowledge, and especially those to distinguish it from belief, 1 one gets the impression that religious knowledge is a contradiction in terms or at least a curiosity. The fact that religion, which necessarily implies religious knowledge, is based on self-evident convictions -on the belief in an entity oft en described as all knowing -contradicts the rationality usually ascribed to knowledge. From a historical perspective this assumption has to be challenged, however. For not only were conceptions of rationality and religion subject to change and continue to be so, but religious movements time and again claimed to be rational in essence.
Renaissance Quarterly, 2021
Chapter 4 explores how thirteenth-century German law was both protective and controlling of Saxon women. It demonstrates that Saxon women's rights were fluid and how that fluidity was captured in the images of the picture-books. Caviness here acknowledges that women and Jews are not represented in any given section of the Sachsenspiegel but, rather, are referred to in clauses peppered throughout Eike's text. The picture-books, notes Caviness, therefore add extra-textual pictorial representations of both women and Jews in places where they are not seen in the legal text. This theme is continued in chapter 5 and its closer examination of Jews. Caviness parallels the fluctuating nature of settlement in German lands with the picture-books' depiction of the Jewish male. Although stereotypical images of Jews do appear in the fourteenth-century picture-books, predominantly through clothing, Jews are also depicted as an object of compensatory projection. Caviness thus concludes that there is no fixed societal position of Jews in the picture-books between 1300 and 1600 and they are, instead, a reflection of the contradictory experiences of fourteenth-century Jewish communities in German lands. The final chapter returns to the question of reception, picking up where chapter 2 left off, and continues the story from the eighteenth century to the present. Here the discussion mostly centers on adopting the Sachsenspiegel as a cultural artifact, but one that, since the 1930s, became weighed down by nationalism and racism. Caviness has certainly contributed to the Sachsenspiegel 's rehabilitation. This is a beautiful homage to Caviness's long-term research partner Charles Nelson, and a well-presented examination of the legal standing of marginal groups in a society dominated by male Christians. It does well to draw on comparable examples to place the picture-books in a wider European context, and readers will be drawn in by the beautifully reproduced images. Some readers may feel misled by the title in that women and Jews are only fully treated in chapters four and five. The size and weight of the tome is also somewhat prohibitive in what might otherwise be a good introductory text for students. These critiques aside, this is an absorbing exploration of the Sachsenspiegel picture-books that will certainly be an asset to the bookshelves of scholars in diverse fields of study.