A novel inhibitory nucleo-cortical circuit controls cerebellar Golgi cell activity (original) (raw)
Related papers
Author response: A novel inhibitory nucleo-cortical circuit controls cerebellar Golgi cell activity
2015
The cerebellum, a crucial center for motor coordination, is composed of a cortex and several nuclei. The main mode of interaction between these two parts is considered to be formed by the inhibitory control of the nuclei by cortical Purkinje neurons. We now amend this view by showing that inhibitory GABA-glycinergic neurons of the cerebellar nuclei (CN) project profusely into the cerebellar cortex, where they make synaptic contacts on a GABAergic subpopulation of cerebellar Golgi cells. These spontaneously firing Golgi cells are inhibited by optogenetic activation of the inhibitory nucleo-cortical fibers both in vitro and in vivo. Our data suggest that the CN may contribute to the functional recruitment of the cerebellar cortex by decreasing Golgi cell inhibition onto granule cells.
Cell, 1998
The cerebellar cortex forms an array of defined neural 2 Morphological Brain Science networks consisting of only five major types of neuronal Kyoto University Faculty of Medicine cells (Ramó n y Cajal, 1911; Eccles et al., 1967). Purkinje Kyoto 606-8501, Japan cells receive excitatory inputs from parallel fibers and 3 Department of Physiology climbing fibers and serve as the single output system Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine of the cerebellar cortex. Granule cells are excitatory Kyoto 602-0841, Japan interneurons that relay mossy fiber inputs via parallel 4 Department of Physiology fibers to Purkinje cells. The activity of Purkinje cells is Kanazawa University School of Medicine modulated by three types of inhibitory interneurons that Kanazawa 920-8640, Japan are activated by the parallel fibers and categorized into two main types: basket and stellate cells, which reside 5 Department of Biophysics in the molecular layer, and Golgi cells, which are located Graduate School of Science in the granular layer. Kyoto University Golgi cells have extensive radial dendritic trees that Kyoto 606-8502, Japan receive inputs from the parallel fibers and in turn termi-6 Laboratory of Transgenic Technology nate their axonic plexus on granule cell dendrites in the Institute of Molecular Embryology and Genetics cerebellar glomeruli (Eccles et al., 1967). The Golgi cells Kumamoto University School of Medicine release an inhibitory ␥-aminobutyric acid (GABA) trans-Kumamoto 862-0976, Japan mitter (Eccles et al., 1964; Puia et al., 1994) and are 7 Research and Education Center thought to contribute to reduction and filtering of mossy for Genetic Information fiber inputs before distributing inputs to Purkinje cells Nara Institute of Science and Technology (Marr, 1969; Gabbiani et al., 1994). In addition, the inhibi-Ikoma 630-0101, Japan tory interactions such as the Golgi cell-granule cell inter-8 Institute for Comprehensive Medical Science action, which form a feedback inhibitory circuit, may School of Medicine also affect their temporal patterning (for review, see Fujita Health University Singer, 1996) and would thus play an important role in Toyoake 470-1192, Japan information processing of motor responses (Marr,
Cerebellar Nuclei: Key Roles for Strategically Located Structures
The Cerebellum, 2010
With the exception of vestibular information, cerebellar nuclei represent the unique source of output of the cerebellar circuitry. The fastigial (FN), globose/emboliform (interpositus, IN), and dentate (DN) nuclei receive inhibitory GABAergic signals from Purkinje neurons and send back fibers to the cerebellar cortex. The numerous GABA-A inhibitory synapses between cerebellar cortex and cerebellar nuclei allow responses to high-frequency Purkinje cell firing . Cerebellar nuclei receive excitatory collaterals of mossy fibers and climbing fibers, especially via AMPA and NMDA receptors . A subset of small neurons in cerebellar nuclei project to the inferior olivary complex, providing a feedback to the inferior olive. Cerebellar nuclei thus integrate the converging excitatory and inhibitory signals to provide the final output of the cerebellar circuits. Each cerebellar nucleus has a separate somatotopic representation of the body . The projections to different cerebral cortical areas originate from distinct areas of cerebellar nuclei. In particular, the DN is spatially divided into a motor and nonmotor zone, with a closed loop from the nucleus to the cerebral cortex and back to the nucleus. Cerebellar nuclei control differentially the medial and lateral motor systems and their functions [4]. The vestibular and FN are concerned with the control of eye movements, control of head orientation, stance, and gait. FN can be functionally divided into rostral and caudal components [4, 5]. The rostral portion is involved in the control of somatic musculature, head orientation, and eye-gaze shifts [4]. The caudal FN plays key roles in saccade generation and smooth pursuit [6]. The IN is particularly active during the modulation of various reflexes and sensory feedback [7]. The eyeblink responses are typically associated with a modulation of activity in behaving animals [8]. The intermediate cortex and the IN fire in relation to the antagonist muscle group [9, 10], in agreement with a role in damping the limb oscillations and compensation of errors [11]. The IN participates in the excitability of the stretch reflexes [12]
PloS one, 2012
Inhibitory interneurons in the cerebellar granular layer are more heterogeneous than traditionally depicted. In contrast to Golgi cells, which are ubiquitously distributed in the granular layer, small fusiform Lugaro cells and globular cells are located underneath the Purkinje cell layer and small in number. Globular cells have not been characterized physiologically. Here, using cerebellar slices obtained from a strain of gene-manipulated mice expressing GFP specifically in GABAergic neurons, we morphologically identified globular cells, and compared their synaptic activity and monoaminergic influence of their electrical activity with those of small Golgi cells and small fusiform Lugaro cells. Globular cells were characterized by prominent IPSCs together with monosynaptic inputs from the axon collaterals of Purkinje cells, whereas small Golgi cells or small fusiform Lugaro cells displayed fewer and smaller spontaneous IPSCs. Globular cells were silent at rest and fired spike dischar...
2008
Abstract—The deep cerebellar nuclei (DCN) are the final integrative units of the cerebellar network. The strongest single afferent to the DCN is formed by GABAergic Purkinje neuron axons whose synapses constitute the majority of all synapses in the DCN, with their action strongly regulating the intrinsic activity of their target neurons. Although this is well established, it remains unclear whether all DCN cell groups receive a functionally similar inhibitory input.
F1000 - Post-publication peer review of the biomedical literature, 2012
Here we provide evidence that revises the inhibitory circuit diagram of the cerebellar cortex. It was previously thought that Golgi cells, interneurons that are the sole source of inhibition onto granule cells, were exclusively coupled via gap junctions. Moreover, Golgi cells were believed to receive GABAergic inhibition from molecular layer interneurons (MLIs). Here we challenge these views by optogenetically activating the cerebellar circuitry to determine the timing and pharmacology of inhibition onto Golgi cells, and by performing paired recordings to directly assess synaptic connectivity. In contrast with current thought, we find that Golgi cells, not MLIs, make inhibitory GABAergic synapses onto other Golgi cells. As a result, MLI feedback does not regulate the Golgi cell network, and Golgi cells are inhibited approximately two milliseconds before Purkinje cells following a mossy fiber input. Hence, Golgi cells and Purkinje cells receive unique sources of inhibition, and can differentially process shared granule cell inputs.
Control of Cerebellar Nuclear Cells: A Direct Role for Complex Spikes?
The Cerebellum, 2011
The question of what modulates the firing of the cerebellar nuclei (CN) is one to which we presently have a surprisingly incomplete answer. Because most synaptic input to the CN originates from Purkinje cells (PCs), and simple spikes (SSs) are far more numerous than complex spikes (CSs), SSs are generally thought to be the dominant influence on the CN. However, evidence, reviewed here, suggests that this appears not to be the case in some physiologically important situations. As an alternative, we propose that CS activity may have at least as significant an effect on CN firing as do SSs. In particular, we suggest that CS activity has a role in controlling the bursts CN neurons show during various movements, during sleep states, and under ketaminexylazine anesthesia. The ability to perform this role rests on the fact that CSs can be highly synchronized among PCs that project to the same CN neuron. Specifically, we suggest that synchronized CSs help determine the temporal course of the CN bursts, most often their offset, and that SSs and activity from cerebellar afferents may modulate the specific firing pattern within each burst. This joint control of CN activity may help explain anomalies present in the standard model for synaptic control of CN activity in which determination of CN firing patterns is attributed primarily to SSs.
The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2014
The principal neurons of the cerebellar nuclei (CN), the sole output of the olivo-cerebellar system, receive a massive inhibitory input from Purkinje cells (PCs) of the cerebellar cortex. Morphological evidence suggests that CN principal cells are also contacted by inhibitory interneurons, but the properties of this connection are unknown. Using transgenic, tracing, and immunohistochemical approaches in mice, we show that CN interneurons form a large heterogeneous population with GABA/glycinergic phenotypes, distinct from GABAergic olive-projecting neurons. CN interneurons are found to contact principal output neurons, via glycine receptor (GlyR)-enriched synapses, virtually devoid of the main GABA receptor (GABAR) subunits α1 and γ2. Those clusters account for 5% of the total number of inhibitory receptor clusters on principal neurons. Brief optogenetic stimulations of CN interneurons, through selective expression of channelrhodopsin 2 after viral-mediated transfection of the flexe...
Clusters of cerebellar Purkinje cells control their afferent climbing fiber discharge
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013
Climbing fibers, the projections from the inferior olive to the cerebellar cortex, carry sensorimotor error and clock signals that trigger motor learning by controlling cerebellar Purkinje cell synaptic plasticity and discharge. Purkinje cells target the deep cerebellar nuclei, which are the output of the cerebellum and include an inhibitory GABAergic projection to the inferior olive. This pathway identifies a potential closed loop in the olivo-cortico-nuclear network. Therefore, sets of Purkinje cells may phasically control their own climbing fiber afferents. Here, using in vitro and in vivo recordings, we describe a genetically modified mouse model that allows the specific optogenetic control of Purkinje cell discharge. Tetrode recordings in the cerebellar nuclei demonstrate that focal stimulations of Purkinje cells strongly inhibit spatially restricted sets of cerebellar nuclear neurons. Strikingly, such stimulations trigger delayed climbing-fiber input signals in the stimulated Purkinje cells. Therefore, our results demonstrate that Purkinje cells phasically control the discharge of their own olivary afferents and thus might participate in the regulation of cerebellar motor learning. motor control | olivo-cerebellar loop | complex spikes T he cerebellar cortex is involved in a wealth of functions, from the control of posture to higher cognitive processes (1-3). Purkinje cells (PCs) are key processing units of the cerebellar cortex (4): each PC receives more than 175,000 parallel fiber synaptic inputs carrying information about the ongoing sensorymotor context. It also receives a single inferior olive afferent, the climbing fiber, which triggers a complex spike (CS), modulates PC firing (5), controls synaptic input plasticity, and has been proposed to carry error and clock signals to the cerebellum (2, 4-8). PCs are grouped in multiple parasagittal microzones, each receiving projections from separate areas of the inferior olive and projecting to subregions of the cerebellar nuclei (CN) (9-12). In the CN, PCs make inhibitory contacts on excitatory neurons that project to various premotor areas and propagate cerebellar computations to the motor system. Anatomical evidence indicates that PC terminals also contact CN inhibitory neurons that target inferior olive cells . This nucleoolivary pathway is topographically organized in multiple parallel projections to the inferior olive subnuclei (15), suggesting the existence of closed olivary-cortico-nuclear loops. Therefore, the discharge of a population of PCs in a microzone might not only shape the output of the cerebellum but also control its afferent climbing-fiber signal. Previous studies have shown that stimulation of the nucleo-olivary pathway significantly reduces olivary cell firing (16-18) and that pharmacological and genetic manipulations of PCs or olivary cell activity induce reciprocal modulations of the firing rate of PCs and climbing fibers .