“Kierkegaard and Religionswissenschaft: A Source- and Reception-Historical Survey (Part 2).” Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook 28, no. 1 (2023) 377–410. (original) (raw)
Related papers
Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook, 2022
The subject of this two-part article (the second part will be published in KSYB 2023) is the bearing of Søren Kierkegaard’s writings, and of their reception, upon the development of Religionswissenschaft or the comparative study of religion. This first part opens by taking account of Kierkegaard’s own awareness of, and relationship to, “non-Christian” religions (Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, religions of China, etc.), including his late reading of Schopenhauer; then considers Kierkegaard in juxtaposition with his contemporary F. Max Müller, the Sanskritist and foundational pioneer of comparative religion, and the two men’s contrasting relations to F.W.J. Schelling; and finally examines the interest taken in Kierkegaard by William James, Max Weber, and Gerardus van der Leeuw as early twentieth-century contributors through three different disciplines to the study of comparative religion.
Debate #4 Kierkegaard and Theology: Friend or Foe? A Lecture by Myron Penner
Prairie Bible Institute My focus in this paper is on the theological value of the philosophy of nineteenth-century Danish philosopher and theologian, Søren Kierkegaard. My task is to address Kierkegaard's philosophical compatibility with and contribution to Christian theology and the significance Kierkegaard may (not) have for the tasks of the Christian theologian. What frames this issue for my purposes here is the supposed irrelevance of Kierkegaard to theology, as some would have it, while others take an even dimmer view, arguing that Kierkegaard leaves theology in an irrationalist and subjectivist quagmire and that he is best avoided by Christian thinkers.
2016
This project presents a comparative philosophical approach to understanding key elements in the philosophy of Søren Kierkegaard by juxtaposing his works with the philosophy and theology of the Eastern Orthodox Church.. The primary aim of the project is to look at three key areas of Kierkegaard’s philosophy that have been either underrepresented or misunderstood in the literature. These three areas are: Kierkegaard’s views on sin and salvation, Kierkegaard’s epistemology, and Kierkegaard’s philosophy of personhood. The dissertation ends with an epilogue that briefly explores a further area where this comparative approach might provide fruitful results, namely Kierkegaard’s views on collective worship. I argue that the revolutionary nature of Kierkegaard’s break with prevalent views in the Western Christian traditions (Protestantism and Roman Catholicism) have not always been fully appreciated due to the fact that he is most often read through the lens of either Western Christianity o...
Daphne Hampson, Kierkegaard: Exposition and Critique, Oxford: OUP 2013, xiii + 344 pp
Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 2018
The choice of these works is defensible. Unfortunately, the basic thesis of the book is not.1 The first chapter, entitled "Kierkegaard's Intellectual Context," looks at the history of theological thought, focusing primarily on Lutheranism, from the period of the Enlightenment until the first part of the nineteenth century, the period of Kierkegaard's authorship. Hampson rightly points out that insufficient attention is given to the Lutheran context in which Kierkegaard 1 Several of the points in this review were made earlier in posts to the blog Piety on Kierkegaard.