Party Worker: The Rise of a Soviet Regional Leader (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Split and Reconfiguration of Ex-Communist Party Factions in the Russian Oblasts
2004
his article presents the argument that Soviet-Russian politics from 1990 to 1995 should be evaluated not as a battle between democrats and Communists (or neocommunists) but as an intra-party split and a realignment of former Soviet party leaders. For this purpose, local politics in Chelyabinsk, Samara, Ulyanovsk, Tambov, and Tver oblasts are analyzed. One of the most obvious, but never fully considered, facts is that almost all the political leaders in post-Soviet Russia occupied nomenklatura posts only a few years before, including former Prime Minister Yegor Gaidar (an editor of the journal Kommunist) and former Finance Minister Boris Fyodorov (a senior economist of the Foreign Currency Department of the State Bank). A simple fact would suffice for understanding the historical significance of the intra-nomenklatura struggle: in May 1990, the Russian Congress of People’s Deputies, 86 percent of whom were members of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU), elected as their ch...
The estate of change: The specialist rebellion and the democratic movement in Moscow, 19891991
Theory and Society, 1997
The August 1991 overthrow of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union destroyed the institutional foundation of the Soviet political order, presenting a classic case of political revolution in Alexis de Tocqueville's sense.' The following study reconstructs the relation between systemic change and collective action before, during, and after "the August Revolution" by means of a sociological analysis of the principal organization of the democratic movement in Russia at the end of the Soviet period, Democratic Russia or DemRossiia. In 1990, DemRossiia united a plethora of voluntary associations, nascent political parties, pro-reform factions in the CPSU, opposition candidates running in semi-free elections, and prodemocracy deputies in soviet bodies under a broad opposition umbrella intent on democratizing Soviet society. DemRossiia's key role in Boris Yeltsin's June 1991 election as the first president of the Russian Republic-creating a "dual power" situation that culminated in political revolution-underscores the movement's historical significance? In framing pro-democracy protest in late-communist Russia, scholars and journalists alike have repeatedly turned to the image of society mobilizing against the state? The history of Russia's perestroika-era democratic movement, however, runs counter to this image: as we shall see, DemRossiia was mobilized from above, as an extension of a prodemocracy rebellion launched from within the highest echelons of the Soviet Party-state. Indeed, this top-down pattern distinguishes Russia's democratic movement from Poland's Solidarity and Czechoslovakia's "Velvet Revolution": how different our image of Solidarity would be if Lech Walesa had been, like Boris Yeltsin, a member of the Communist Party's Central Committee. The following analysis explains the overlap between fragments of Party officialdom and the democratic movement by identifying a shift of pol it
1979
Problems in Soviet Politics 'Politics', writes Spiro, 'is the process by which a community deals with its problems'.! This book is a study of the problems which the leaders of the Soviet Union attempted to induce their society to resolve during three different years after the Second World War: 1950, 1960, and 1970. It is therefore a study of political content. It defines the shortcomings observed by the leadership, the people and the organisations they tried to mobilise, and shows the measures they decided to take to remedy these. It also considers the leaders' values and views of man and the world, and it deals with political change during a period extending from Stalin to Brezhnev and from relative poverty to relative prosperity. The subject is a vast one. Many scholars choose to employ all available sources to settle just one question. Here the approach is the opposite: a single source has been used to elucidate several questions. Both research strategies are based on the assumption that science is a collective and cumulative undertaking. The old German titles were often introduced by a Beitrag zur Kenntnis ... The present study should be regarded as just that: a contribution to our knowledge of Soviet politics, socialist politics, and perhaps to some degree politics in general. The source that is exhaustively exploited in the study consists of the editorials in the daily newspaper Pravda, the official organ of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. These texts are studied carefully by everyone desiring to keep abreast of the reactions and ambitions of the Soviet Party leadership, including East European governments, diplomats and journalists in Moscow, and millions of career-conscious Soviet citizens. Pravda has often been used in research on Soviet politics, but has never been subjected to a methodical and comparative study, apart from a few quantitative content analyses of sharply restricted problems. What is undertaken here is a systematic and multidimensional ransacking of the informational content of the Pravda editorials, with the aim of establishing the 'agenda' determined by the apex of the Soviet social pyramid for political and administrative work at all lower levels. The source materials have been prepared with the help of information retrieval, a technique that has been widely employed in bibliographical work, but seldom for analytical research purposes. The 1
Revolutionary Passage: From Soviet To Post-Soviet Russia 1985-2000
Revolutionary Passage: From Soviet To Post-Soviet Russia 1985-2000, 2005
Numerous accounts of pro-democracy rebellion in perestroika-era Russia explain democratization as an effect of the formation of a Russian "middle class." While survey, interview and archival data on the Moscow branch of Russia's united democratic opposition in 1990-91 (Democratic Russia or DR) identifies intellectuals and professional as DR's primary base, the study emphasizes the reproduction of Soviet-style political authoritarianism within DR. By developing an institutional profile of Soviet specialists as a state-dependent social estate that distinguishes Soviet specialists from Western middle classes, the study provides an alternative account of democratic sentiments among Russian specialists framed in terms of the disintegration of the Communist Party's organizational capacities and the demonstration effect of relative Western prosperity. The assumption that the mere numerical increase of Russian specialists explains democratization is thus refuted.
PARTY COLLAPSE AND SOVIET BREAKDOWN: A FAILURE OF GENERATIONAL RENEWAL?
НАУЧНЫЙ ВЕСТНИК ВФ РАНХиГС - ПОЛИТОЛОИЯ И СОЦИОЛОГИЯ. (Nauchny Vestnik VF RANHiGS - Politologiya i Sotsiologiya, issue 3, 2017)., 2017
My purpose is to relate the explanation for the collapse of the Soviet Union to the way in which Russia has developed during the subsequent decades. While aware of the deteriorating economic position of the USSR after 1970, I argue that the causes of collapse were primarily political rather than economic. Failure of generational renewal, in the long term, was a major cause, while the removal of Communist Party exclusivity provided the immediate expla- nation. Division within the previously governing elites at all levels led to terminal crisis. Perestroika was intended to save the Soviet Union through reform but many of its consequences were not anticipated by Gorbachev. Instead of the hoped-for social democratic model, a recrudescence of authoritarian rule, especially after 2004, took place, sustained by the Orthodox Church. In my new book about my father I further explore these ideas: https://www.litres.ru/mihail-aleksandrovich-anipkin/partrabotnik/
Impressions of Perestroika: A Diary
1989
The following is a slightly edited version of a diary kept by David Mandel during the summer of 1988 when he visited the Soviet Union on an academic exchange. Mandel; who teaches political science at the Universite du Quebec a Montreal, is fluent in Russian and has made several trips to the USSR over the past years. Some of the early results of his research on the perestroika (restructuring) and the Soviet working class have been published in The Socialist Register (1988 and 1989) and in L'homme et la societe in 1988.
WE, THE PEOPLE: PROFILING SOVIET PARTY ELITES, 1900s-1990s
2022
The article profiles the upper echelon of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, specifically the members of the CC CPSU, and quantifies its evolution as a group by means of a statistical analysis of certain elements in the personnel files of CC members. The analysis is based on a database of 1,931 people whose personnel files were entered into a specially designed database with fifteen different characteristics: dates of birth and death, social origins, nationality, education, ranks, places of work, burial places, and others. A statistical analysis of the data allows a detailed profile of Communist Party elites and benefits us enormously in assessing the structure and nature of the Soviet state from 1917 to 1990. The profiling shows that the members of the highest body of party power were indeed representatives of the people: they came from humble origins and belonged to dozens of national and ethnic groups. Additionally, the generational approach leads to many other surprising discoveries that help retire many stereotypes and myths harbored by historians of Russia and the Soviet Union.