The United States and the International Financial Institutions: Power and Influence Within the World Bank and the IMF (original) (raw)
Related papers
Multilateralism: Theoretical Perspectives on the Policy Framework
Public Policy and Administration Research, 2017
Multilateralism is relatively new concept in the world politics and became extensively used in the post-World War II era. While some theorists referred to multilateralism as the global governance, others linked multilateralism to internationalism, world order and international politics (Bouchard, Peterson, & Tocci, 2013). The aim of this paper is to examine some key multilateral policies’ theoretical frameworks and see how different theorists analyzed multilateral policies and multilateral activities. The paper concludes by highlighting several issues related to the different theoretical frameworks to multilateralism emphasizing the limitations of the majority of these frameworks. Nevertheless, the institutional approach to multilateralism clearly identifies the state behavior and recognizes the role of the institution in shaping the social identity of multilateral institutions. Additionally, the institutional approach was inclusive in explaining the Western identity of these organi...
Multilateralism in the Twenty-First Century
Global Perspectives
The rise of geostrategic rivalry between the United States and China is changing international cooperation. As China seeks new influence and the United States seeks to contain China and to reduce its own international obligations, three dimensions of multilateralism are becoming particularly important. The first is the management of the superpower rivalry, through formal treaties, informal arrangements among states, and international institutions. The second is the capacity of the leadership of any international institution to foster cooperation beyond the immediate preferences of one or another of the most powerful member states. The third dimension is the legitimacy on which the authority of international institutions rests. The evolution of these three elements will shape the future of multilateralism, by which I refer to the arrangements created and agreed by states which facilitate cooperation by enshrining commitments to diffuse reciprocity and peaceful dispute settlement. The...
Chapter 2: The Multilateral Instruments of Security
2009
Multilateralism is not an option, but a necessity, indeed an inevitability for the international community. It is the product of an evolutionary process. Muchkund Dubey, former Foreign Secretary of the Government of India 1 The concept of multilateral approaches to security threats is by no means a new (nor always a successful) one, dating back to the Concert of Europe in the 19th century and the League of Nations after World War I. The post-World War II world marked the foundation of the UN and led to an unprecedented rise in the number of multilateral institutions. It is interesting to note that the definition of multilateralism has not changed much since then, remaining "the practice of coordinating national policies in groups of three or more states", as Robert Keohane defined it. 2 John Gerard Ruggie expands this definition to imply that such coordination is based on certain principles, describing the three specific properties of international organisations as indivisibility (costs and benefits), generalised principles (general or universal norms) and diffuse reciprocity. 3 Drastic changes in the international system after the end of the Cold War have profoundly altered multilateral organisations, most of which were created in the 1950s and 1960s. This chapter analyses the major international institutions, examining them against their achievements in promoting a sustainable multilateralism over the course of time and their ability to adapt and operate in a new strategic environment. The following factors characterise the security environment that multilateral institutions operate in, which thus largely influences their activities: The growing interdependence of nations caused by globalisation continues at an accelerated pace, at the same time increasing inequalities and vulnerabilities;
The Fund and the Bank Towards better international economic institutions
New Economy, 2002
mong the institutions of global governance the IMF and the World Bank stand out, with a virtually universal membership, a capability to mobilise large resources and tremendous influence over a large number of governments. They provide development assistance with stringent advice to virtually all developing countries. They are the agencies of first resort in financial crises. And their research and economic analysis is undertaken on a scale unrivalled by any other international economic agency. Partly as a result the Fund and the Bank stir up emotion and anger not only on the streets but even among their own government members. Five critiques of these institutions stand out: q They are ineffective and wasteful. The Bush administration has voiced this criticism, echoing some of the arguments of the US Congress-appointed Commission headed by Allan Meltzer, that the World Bank's own figures demonstrate a high failure rate in its projects. Of course, both the IMF and the World Bank cite evidence of successes and are constantly seeking to improve their 77
International Institutions: For better or worst
This article critically assess the role of international institutions according to the neo-Gramscians ' and Liberal Institutionalists ' view. Neo-Gramscians argue that the real aim of these institutions is to maintain the hegemony. By doing so, the capitalist system has been spread in the world system through free trade policies driven by the WTO and through conditional loans given by the IMF and the World Bank. Liberal Institutionalists argue that international institutions have make cooperation possible and have facilitated the path to achieve common objectives reducing the influence that the hegemon has exerted over them.
2011
This research on the international multilateral system has its raison-de-être in the problems of lack of effective global governance manifested in areas such as global politics, security, economy, environment and others. A fundamental focus of the research is on the latest changes in world politics, including state power shifts, power diffusion from state to non-state actors and the implications of the rapid evolution of globalization over the last two decades, with its proliferating challenges and opportunities. In addition, the research examines reform efforts in multilateral institutions and some of the reform proposals suggested in academic circles. The main objective of the research is to provide a holistic analysis of the current state of the multilateral system, the imperatives of reform in the system, its potential future scenarios as well as some suggestions for the future. No doubt, the United Nations (UN) is the core hub of the current system. Hence, the research principally approaches its subject from the perspective of the UN. In particular, the UN General Assembly is the subject of a case study that aims, among others, to highlight the predicament and potential of this unique forum of multilateral cooperation. DOUTORAMENTO EM RELAÇÕES INTERNACIONAIS Preface xiv Chapter Two, on the imperative of change, attempts to elaborate on the main reasons why, from the point of view of this research, the international multilateral system needs holistic reform today. Rather than the phenomena, this chapter aims to provide a deeper diagnosis of the root problems of global governance. It addresses these argued root problems under three main items: power shifts among the United States of America (USA) and other traditional and emerging powerhouses, with particular focus on China and the European Union (EU); power diffusion from states to non-state actors; and the complexity of current global challenges, lack of effective responses to them and the threat of anti-globalization forces, including nationalism. Consequently, Chapter Three, on the current reform agendas and ideas in debate, examines the current reform agendas in the UN, Bretton Woods institutions and the World Trade Organization (WTO). In addition, it analyzes three serious reform proposals in academic circles: the trans-governmental networks approach of Anne-Marie Slaughter, the proposal of setting up a global power club or global executive committee along the lines of the Group of 20 (G-20) and the demands to establish a concert or league of world democracies together with transforming the North-Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) into a global security organization. Chapter Four, on potential future scenarios, attempts to map potential future scenarios of the international multilateral system. Virtually, this chapter provides a look into the future based on current trends and indicators. It underlines three significant potential scenarios: effective multilateralism, where the UN plays a central overarching role; multilateralism à la carte or multi-multilateralism, which indicates the optional use of various multilateral forums, according to feasibility, on a case-by-case basis; and return of multipolar power politics akin to those of the early 19 th century. This chapter also refers to two other extreme scenarios, global government and global chaos. And it highlights the determining roles of the USA, other great powers and other actors as to which scenario is more likely to take root. The aim of Chapter Five, on the UN and the international multilateral system, is to poise the UN at the center stage of this research. It addresses the historical background of the organization; its mission, structure and main functions; the value of the world body at the time it faces increasing existential threats; and the historical DOUTORAMENTO EM RELAÇÕES INTERNACIONAIS Preface xv problem of lack of political will on the side of its members. This chapter also highlights two critical challenges to the UN today: lack of representative legitimacy and the UN's relevance to the surrounding global environment. Finally, Chapter Six is dedicated to a case study on the UN General Assembly. Most importantly, this chapter attempts to shed light on the unique value of the General Assembly and its potential role in ensuring more effective global governance, provided there is sufficient political will on the side the UN membership. After a basic background, the chapter analyzes the working culture and the current reform agenda in the Assembly. Consequently, it provides an analysis of how the role of the Assembly could be enhanced to improve the effectiveness of the UN in particular and the multilateral system at large. Throughout, the research refers to the results of the aforementioned field questionnaire. This questionnaire was administered on a sample of 50 professionals, drawn from 32 countries, with careers in the fields of diplomacy, international organizations and academia. It contained 11 substantive questions about the international multilateral system and the UN in particular, including the UN General Assembly and the UN Security Council. Ultimately, the research ends with an afterword that basically recapitulates the main arguments and suggestions presented in the research. It should also be noted that the research adopts a general problem-solving approach that, besides identifying the root causes of the problems of the international multilateral system and the UN more specifically, attempts to provide practical, balanced suggestions to resolve these problems.