Philosophical Concepts of Administrative Leadership in China: A Comparative Analysis of Four Leadership Philosophies Across Time (original) (raw)
Related papers
Developing leadership theory in Asia: The role of Chinese philosophy
… Journal of Leadership …, 2005
This paper is about leadership, culture, and theory development. We argue that development of leadership theories in other cultures has to account for philosophical assumptions and frames of reference underpinning those cultures. Specifically, we point out that leadership theory in China has to account for notions of Chinese philosophy. We start our argument by making a case for studying management and leadership from a Chinese perspective. Then we review Western perspectives of management and leadership and introduce the concept of culture to indicate that the notions of management and leadership may have different meanings in different cultures. After this, we present two Chinese approaches to management -socio-behavioral and philosophical approaches -and present several notions of Chinese philosophy. Finally, we illustrate how these notions can be used in interpreting leadership in Asia. Implications and discussion are also presented.
An Emergent Leadership Model Based on Confucian Virtues and East Asian Leadership Practices
International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 2012
For more than 2000 years, Confucian teaching has had tremendous inuence on the history, politics, economy, and culture of East Asian countries and regions. Despite the rapid growth in gross domestic product (GDP), people's standard of living, and economic advancements, Confucian Asia continues to adhere to the Confucian cultural values that they have embraced for hundreds of years. The shared Confucian cultural values and traditions have played an important role in the formation and development of East Asian leadership practices. In this chapter, we examine the Confucian-based cultural values and East Asian leadership practices. Based on Confucian traditions and East Asian leadership practices, leadership model emerged. This model may be applicable in other cultural contexts.
The Roles and Wisdom of Chinese Traditional Philosophy in Explaining Corporate leadership
Theory development in leadership has been researched in different ways, depending on the researcher's methodological choices and understanding of leadership. Using an inductive analysis based on this study, the influences of Chinese traditional philosophy on leadership have emerged. Specifically, the themes of the influences are pointed to the following Chinese traditional philosophies: (1) Spiritual-Buddhism; (2) Humanity-Confucianism; (3) Naturalistic-Taoist philosophy; and (4) Strategic-Sun Zi Art of War. The knowledge and evaluated understanding of the Chinese traditional philosophy are embedded in the life experiences of the respondents. Considering the dynamics of corporate leadership practices and the demands of the ever-changing macro, meso and micro environments, situational context as well as the followership, it is important to acknowledge that wisdom or wisdom to act, rather than mere leadership behaviour that would ensure generation of leadership dynamism. Such an acknowledgement could further drive and reinforce and offer a richer view to sustain the wisdom to act derived from Oriental values and philosophy that influence corporate leadership practices for organizational success and performance. Keyword: Chinese traditional philosophy; wisdom; corporate leadership and inductive analysis;
Is management and organization much the same the world over, or are there significant cultural variations to the practice of management, the concerns of managers, or the sensibilities they bring to their roles (Yang 2012)? What is distinctive about managing and organizing in China? Although framed as an empirical question, the answers are necessarily philosophical because they are concerned with what organization means, how authority is legitimized, what counts as “good work,” the value ascribed to action and outcomes, and the construct of human agency. The four papers in this Issue of Frontiers of Philosophy in China address the question in the case of China, each framing it quite differently.
FRAMING LEADERSHIP IN ASIA AND CHINA
2005
In this paper we argue that today's globalized world calls for more complex and subtle understandings of leadership in/from cultures other than those of the West. A Westerner cannot begin to do this without an understanding of key concepts from other cultures. In our view the study of leadership is/should be essentially interdisciplinary, however Western models draw on behavioral sciences rather than the humanities, notably philosophy. Philosophy can help us better understand values as central to leadership especially as enacted in other-than-Western cultures. Thus to understand leadership from a Chinese perspective we should have/develop management concepts that account for Chinese culture and philosophy. To do the contrary is/would be to underrepresent the Chinese culture, the encounters between Chinese and Western cultures, the impact of culture in Chinese business practices, and to perpetuate a misunderstanding of doing business in China. Research implications are also discussed.
Confucianism Values for Transformational Leadership Development in the Chinese Context
International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management, 2010
The mission of the International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management (IJABIM) is to establish an effective channel of communication between academic and research institutions, policy makers, government agencies, and individuals concerned with the complexities of Asian business, information technologies, sustained development, and globalization. IJABIM promotes and coordinates developments in the fi eld of Asian and Chinese studies, as well as presents strategic roles of IT and management towards sustainable development with emphasis on practical aspects in Asia.
Comparison of leadership styles in Confucian Asian countries
Human Resource Development International, 2018
The purpose of this study was to examine the overall impact of four leadership styles (charismatic, directive, participative, and supportive) in four Confucian Asian countries, China, Japan, South Korea, and Singapore, by reviewing recent studies conducted in those countries. By reviewing 38 studies selected from 430 studies published between 2005 and 2016, we identify the impact of the four leadership styles in the four Asian countries. We start with the research question and purpose, and then propose criteria for selecting the relevant recent studies followed by a review of cultural heritage and its influence on leadership in the four Asian countries. We summarize and review the studies and, finally, discuss the theoretical and practical contributions of this study.