Impact of International Finance and other Institutions on Key Policies of Slovenia (original) (raw)
Related papers
Institutional change in search of the market: The case of Slovenia
1995
Six main characteristics of an economic order are discussed and empirically evaluated for the case of Slovenia. All of them pertain to the institutional setting ab urbe condita; they comprise the legal and jurisdictional situation, the role of private property, the institutionalised strive at competition among firms and individuals, the liberty of markets, the solution of the big assignment problem, and the approach to foreign-trade relations. All six aspects impinge upon the conditions which confront investors in material and in human capital in Slovenia. The analysis shows that Slovenia has had, for three years now, by and large the same problems that other countries in transition had. For example, it still has, among others, tight regulations regarding foreign exchange transactions, and a highly socialist property system burdened with too complicated procedures of privatisation. The authors conclude that in Slovenia, as in the other formerly socialist economies, transformation sh...
Assessing the Effects of Some Structural Measures in Slovenia
2016
The contents of this publication may be reproduced in whole or in part provided that the source is acknowledged According to IMAD analyses, the structural imbalances in Slovenia have been accumulating for several years, which have in turn impeded economic recovery and, in particular, the achievement of lasting, stable economic growth and long-term fiscal sustainability. We have used the Development Report 1 and Economic Issues, 2 our annual publications, as the basis for identifying the main challenges to Slovenia's economic policy. In these reports a wide range of indicators are used to analyse the main factors affecting Slovenia's long-term development. They reveal that the key structural imbalances in Slovenia include low productivity, low activity on the part of some population groups, inadequate adjustment to demographic changes, a persistently high structural public deficit and high general government debt. The difficulties in these areas, which are closely interlinked, are considered to be the key reason for the weakness in the current economic recovery. Owing to their structural nature, they also dampen potential for long-term growth and undermine the long-term sustainability of the public finances. In view of the gradual economic recovery, we estimate that the time is now ripe for Slovenia to implement a set of comprehensive structural reforms. In times of deep recession, structural measures were more difficult to introduce because the unstable economic and political situation meant that economic policy makers had to focus on short-term counter-cyclical measures. The factors that are now assisting Slovenia regarding the implementation of structural reforms include: (i) the recovery of economic activity, which is at least partly based on domestic demand; (ii) the elimination of uncertainties related to the stabilisation of the banking system; (iii) favourable pricing terms of funding; and (iv) political stability. In such an environment, economic policy has some leeway regarding the design and implementation of measures, which are usually easier to carry out in the first half of the political cycle. This analysis presents simulations of selected measures that address the key challenges ahead for Slovenia. They have been selected on the basis of various criteria, the most important of which include their ability to improve the situation in targeted areas, the empirically supported effectiveness of measures in other countries, and their acceptability in relation to other imbalances in the economy or their impact on its well-being as a whole. The choice of simulated measures was also conditional on the limitations inherent to the models used. In contrast to the measures that have been used the most in recent years, the simulated measures are primarily intended to remedy multiple problems at the same time rather than address only one area. In order to enhance the effectiveness of the set of measures, it will be necessary to define and list them by priority, as too broad a set can reduce the focus on those which are the most important. The credibility and speed of implementation also have a positive impact on the effectiveness of the reform programme, particularly in the short and medium term. 3 Empirical estimates suggest that, despite some negative short-term effects, these structural measures would have a significant and permanent positive impact on long-term economic potential and fiscal sustainability in Slovenia. As expected, positive macroeconomic and fiscal effects dominate in the long term. However, it is also necessary to point to certain, albeit small, negative long-term consequences of the simulated measures: for example, according to the model-based assessments conducted, some of the measures on the product market reduce employment. The model-based simulations also indicate that there are considerable short-term positive effects for measures aimed at reducing administrative barriers as well as those which match supply and demand on the labour market and reduce costs for businesses. Some other measures on the product market could also lower costs and prices, but this would further exacerbate current deflationary pressures. Moreover, some measures could decelerate the urgently needed fiscal consolidation process, at least in the short term. However, it should be noted that, in the long term, structural measures tend to have a positive impact on public finances through endogenously stimulated economic growth. These measures must be defined and implemented by taking full advantage of the flexibility offered within the existing rules of the Stability and Growth Pact 4 regarding temporary deviations from the medium-term budgetary objective. This holds particularly true for the years to come, when the general government deficit in Slovenia is forecast to fall significantly below 3% of GDP. Since there are several factors which can increase the uncertainty of the estimates, the results of the simulations should be interpreted with caution. The results of model-based simulations or estimates relying on parameters taken from other studies may be biased due to changes in the economy's structure,
The new version of the CGE model of the Slovenian economy based on the 1998 SAM was used for simulations of the consequences of further foreign trade liberalisation after 1998 as the outcome of implementation of Free Trade Agreements and the European Agreement, adaptation of the Customs Tariff to the EU Common External Tariff for manufacturing products, adoption of the EU Common External Tariff after the accession of Slovenia to the EU, and estimated transfers between the two budgets. Results obtained show a positive net outcome of Slovenian accession to the EU in the long run. On the other hand, rational behaviour by the government will certainly moderate possible short-run negative effects and improve favourable long-run effects. Slovenia successfully concluded accession negotiations with the EU in December 2002, along with nine other candidate countries. On financial issues, for the period 2004-06, the following main provisions were agreed. First, Slovenia's aims for the agriculture sector were fulfilled, i.e. the possibility of direct payments from the country's own budget, the same level of direct payments from 2007 on, production quotas not below the level of current production and a financially very attractive solution for rural development. Second, for regional policy and structural funds Slovenia will receive 404 million EUR, with the possibility of further regionalisation on the NUTS-2 level. Third, the EU will partially cover the costs (45% or 107 million EUR) of the construction and maintenance of the Schengen border. Fourth, regarding transfers and the net budget position, Slovenia succeeded in raising budgetary compensations from 45 million EUR in 2003 to 85 million EUR for each year of the 2004-06 period. Fifth, and finally, the Slovenian net budgetary position will remain positive in 2007-13. These provisions should in fact demonstrate that in the financial part of negotiations Slovenia succeeded in achieving the best combination to fulfil two aims. Namely, the agreement with the EU should enable the continuation of the process of real convergence and should not worsen the budgetary position and thus cause no
Current financial crisis and its consequences for the economy of Kosovo
2014
The undersigned Besnik Berisha a student at the University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Economics, (hereafter: FELU), declare that I am the author of the master's thesis entitled Current Financial Crisis and its Consequences for the Economy of Kosovo-Comparative Analysis with South East European Countries, written under supervision of Professor Ph.D. Janez Prasnikar. In accordance with the Copyright and Related Rights Act (Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, Nr. 21/1995 with changes and amendments) I allow the text of my master's thesis to be published on the FELU website.
Études helléniques / Hellenic Studies, 2015
économique européenne. Il propose un cadre théorique qui établit une distinction entre l'européanisation comme une variable indépendante / dépendante et l'agence / structure, permettant ainsi d'identifier quatre types de mécanismes facilitant le processus d'européanisation et les résultats de celle-ci. La recherche empirique est réalisée par une étude du processus de la prise de décision au niveau de la politique étrangère slovène, basée sur des entretiens avec les principaux responsables slovènes du ministère des Affaires étrangères et des diplomates, ainsi que sur des documents primaires et de la littérature secondaire. Basé sur les conclusions issues de la recherche empirique cet article soutient que dans le contexte de la crise financière et économique européenne, l'Union européenne est devenue plus une partie du problème qu'une partie de la solution pour les priorités slovènes de la politique étrangère : ce qui explique pourquoi le processus slovène de décision politique étrangère s'est dégagé du niveau de l'Union européenne; la politique étrangère slovène en substance a été écartée considérablement du cadre normatif européen.
Economic Effects in Slovenia within Integration in European Union
Journal of Empirical Research in Accounting & Auditing An International Journal
The study is going to analyze the economic development of Slovenia before and after membership in European Union. We will discuss whether economic cooperation between Slovenia and European Union members increased or decreased after European Union membership. This article provides a comprehensive and contemporary comparative analysis of the economic performance, the economic structure and the trade relations between Slovenia and European Union countries, allowing us to detect basic trends and developments. We will compare the economic performance of Slovenia and other European Union members, looking at aggregate figures from integration in European Union such as foreign trade, Foreign Direct Investment, Gross Domestic Product and its structure, level of structural unemployment and employment, inflation and level of income.