Using an international survey to inform scenarios of the future of engineering education (original) (raw)

2014, 25th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education : Engineering the Knowledge Economy: Collaboration, Engagement & Employability

Abstract

BACKGROUND Technological, economic, and social changes will reshape undergraduate engineering education, but there is little consensus on its future. IEEE created a Curricula and Pedagogy Committee (CPC) and charged it with forecasting the future of engineering education in general and specifically to make recommendations regarding roles that IEEE will play in preparing for and crafting that future. The IEEE CPC used scenario planning to consider possible trends in engineering education and is opening its thoughts to public scrutiny. The IEEE CPC developed a survey to compare scenarios that it developed with patterns formed from respondents' views of the future. PURPOSE The CPC Committee functions as a research team seeking to learn (1) what is the current state of practice in higher education programs in fields of interest for IEEE?, (2) how are engineering programs forecasting practices that need to be in place to meet the needs of the profession in 10 years?, and (3) what services and collaborations might transform current practice to meet those needs? DESIGN/METHOD A survey was developed by the IEEE CPC. To examine how engineering programs might innovate and adapt, the survey included questions about current and future instructional practices and uses of instructional technologies. To examine values and competencies of engineering academics, the survey included questions that addressed skills that students have now and those they should have in the future as well as the roles that evaluation of teaching played in evaluating faculty members. The survey was deployed in July-August 2014 to individuals who (1) teach undergraduate students, (2) administer a degree program (i.e., Department Chairs and Heads), (3) serve as a top-level administrator over all engineering degree programs (i.e., Deans), and (4) work professionally in engineering. The results were compiled by IEEE Strategic Research and reported to the CPC for analysis. RESULTS This paper describes the demographics of the 2176 survey respondents. In addition, it reports on responses to the survey about teaching and quality versus quantity of engineers. An encouraging finding is that there is agreement among all types of respondents on the strategic priority of quality over quantity of engineers. CONCLUSIONS The congruence of our findings with expectations voiced by others, particularly in the area of teaching methods, indicates that the survey has validity and suggests that fields of interest to IEEE match the aggregate behaviour of engineering described in other work. The general congruence of responses across diverse respondents regarding the strategic priority of quality over quantity suggests that the field may be moving towards the more promising future scenarios. Results from the survey provide insight into the extent to which academics and industry professionals are expecting and contributing to the possible futures described in the scenario planning, which in turn provides insight as to how to prepare for whatever the future holds.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (37)

  1. Anderson, L. S., & K. A. Gilbride (2003). Pre-university Outreach: Encouraging Students to Consider Engineering Careers," Global J. Eng. Educ., 7(1), pp. 87-93.
  2. ASEE -the American Society for Engineering Education (2014). Engineering data management system, Accessed 23 July 2014, [Online]. Available from http://www.asee.org/datamining
  3. Berdie, D., J. Anderson, & M. Niebuhr (1986). Questionnaires: Design and use. (2nd ed.) Metuchen, N.J.: The Scarecrow Press, Inc.
  4. Berger, G. (1964). Phénoménologie du Temps et Prospectives, Paris, France: Presse Universitaires de France.
  5. Black, K. M. (1994). An industry view of engineering education. Journal of engineering education, 83(1), 26-28.
  6. Borrego, M., J. E. Froyd, & T. S. Hall (2010). Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in US engineering departments. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(3), 185-207.
  7. Bosnjak, M., & T. Tuten (2003). Prepaid and Promised Incentives in Web Surveys. Social Science Computing Review, 21(2), 208-217.
  8. Bowen, E., J. Prior, S. Lloyd, S. Thomas, & L. Newman-Ford (2007). Engineering more engineers-bridging the mathematics and careers advice gap. Engineering Education, 2(1), 23-32.
  9. Church, A. (1993). Estimating the Effect of Incentives on Mail Survey Resonse Rates: A Meta-Analysis. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 57(1), 62-79.
  10. Couper, M. P., M. W. Traugott, & M. J. Lamias (2001). Web Survey Design and Administration. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 65(2), 230-253.
  11. Deutskens, E., K. Ruyter, M. Wetzels, & P. Oosterveld (2004). Response Rate and Response Quality of Internet-Based Surveys: An Experimental Study. Marketing Letters, 15(1), 21-36.
  12. Dillman, D. (2007). Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  13. Dillman, D., R. Tortora, & D. Bowker (1999). Principles for Constructing Web Surveys. Pullman, WA: Washington State University.
  14. Engineers Australia (2012). Inquiry into the shortage of engineering and related employment skills. Senate Education Employment and Workplace Relations References Committee (Ed.).
  15. Froyd, J. E., B. Dicht, E. D. Lindsay, S. M. Lord, M. W. Ohland, & K. Prahallad (2014). Scenario Planning to Envision Potential Futures for Engineering Education. Accepted to Proc. 2014 IEEE/ASEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Madrid, Spain, October 22- 25, 2014.
  16. Froyd, J. E., S. M. Lord, M. W. Ohland, K. Prahallad, E. Lindsay, & B. Dicht (2014). Special Session: Scenario Planning to Envision Potential Futures for Engineering Education. Accepted to Proc. 2014 IEEE/ASEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Madrid, Spain, October 22-25, 2014.
  17. Godfrey, E. (2007). Cultures within cultures: Welcoming or unwelcoming for women? Proc. of the 2007 ASEE Annu. Conf., Honolulu, HI, June.
  18. Harrison, M. (2012), Jobs and growth: the importance of engineering skills to the UK economy. London: Royal Academy of Engineering. Online. Internet. 22 Sep 2014. Available: http://www.raeng.org.uk/news/publications/list/reports/Jobs\_and\_Growth.pdf.
  19. Hazzan, O., D. Levy, & A. Tal (2005). Electricity in the palms of her hands-The perception of Electrical Engineering by outstanding female High School pupils," IEEE Trans. Edu., 48(3), pp. 402-412.
  20. Jackson, S. A. (2004). The quiet crisis: Falling short in producing American scientific and technical talent. Retrieved February 20, 2007, from http://www.bestworkforce.org/PDFdocs/Quiet\_Crisis.pdf.
  21. JEC, US Congress Joint Economic Committee (2012). STEM Education: Preparing for the Jobs of the Future. Washington DC.
  22. Kahn, H., & A. J. Wiener. "The Next Thirty-Three Years: A Framework for Speculation." Daedalus, 96(3), pp. 705-732, 1967.
  23. Kaplowitz, M., T. Hadlock, & R. Levine (2004). A comparison of web and mail survey response rates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68(1), 94-101.
  24. Litzler, E. (2010). Sex segregation in undergraduate engineering majors. Sociology Dept., Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA, 2010.
  25. Lord, S. M., C. E. Brawner, M. M. Camacho, R. A. Layton, M. W. Ohland, & M. H. Wasburn (2009). Work in Progress: Engineering Students' Disciplinary Choices: Do Race and Gender Matter?" Proc. IEEE/ASEE Frontiers in Edu. Conf., San Antonio, TX, October.
  26. Lord, S. M., R. A. Layton, & M. W. Ohland (2011). Trajectories of electrical engineering and computer engineering students by race and gender. IEEE Trans. Education 54(4), 610- 618.
  27. Lord, S. M., R. A. Layton, & M. W. Ohland (in press). Multi-institution study of student demographics and outcomes in electrical and computer engineering in the USA. IEEE Trans. Education, doi: 10.1109/TE.2014.2344622, URL: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6881755&isnumber=435 8717.
  28. Martin, R., B. Maytham, J. Case, & D. Fraser (2005). Engineering graduates' perceptions of how well they were prepared for work in industry. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(2), 167-180.
  29. Matthews, P., L. Ryan-Collins, J. Wells, H. Sillem, & H. Wright (2012). Engineers for Africa: Identifying Engineering Capacity Needs in Sub-Saharan Africa. Royal Academy of Engineering, Africa-UK Engineering for Development Partnership.
  30. Mills, J. E., M. E. Ayre, & J. Gill (2003). Perceptions and understanding of gender inclusive curriculum in engineering education. J. Professional Issues Eng. Educ. Practice, 120(4), pp. 203-210.
  31. NAE, the National Academy of Engineering (2006). Rising above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. Retrieved September 1, 2006 from http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11463.html.
  32. PCAST, the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (2012).Report to the President. Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics, 2012.
  33. Rao, R., A. L. Pawley, S. R. Hoffmann, M. E. Cardella, M. E., & M. W. Ohland, (2013). An ecofeminist grounded analysis of sustainability in engineering education: Skill-set, discipline and value. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(6), 1472-1489.
  34. Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993). Multiple scenario developing: Its conceptual and behavioral basis. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 14, pp 193-213.
  35. Schoemaker, P. J. H. (2002). Profiting from uncertainty: Strategies for succeeding no matter what the future brings. New York, NY, USA: Free Press.
  36. Smith, E., & S. Gorard (2011). Is there a shortage of scientists? A re-analysis of supply for the UK. British Journal of Educational Studies, 59(2), 159-177.
  37. Wadhwa, V., G. Gereffi, B. Rissing, & R. Ong, (2007). Where the engineers are. Issues in Science and Technology, 23(3), 73-84.