Research Impact Indicators and Visualizations (original) (raw)
Related papers
Research Impact Metrics: A Faculty Perspective
Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research
With an increasing focus on scholarly communications in academic libraries, librarians are struggling with how best to support faculty with the location, interpretation, and appropriate use of metrics. Very little has been written about the faculty researcher perspective on metrics and, as a result, librarians may have a deep knowledge of the tools but have a more limited understanding of the users’ viewpoint. Seventy-nine senior research faculty who were five or more years post-tenure were interviewed. Faculty from the Humanities, Social Sciences and Sciences were all invited to participate. Each interview consisted of nine questions relating to how the faculty understand and use impact metrics in their academic life. Responses were varied to all of the questions and were tied closely to the disciplinary fields of the research faculty interviewed. A large majority of the interviewed faculty viewed the library as a key resource for getting more information relating to metrics. This ...
Research Impact Evaluation Tools: Myths and Reality
IAIC Transactions on Sustainable Digital Innovation (ITSDI), 2022
Research is one of the core activities for enhancing existing human capabilities. Research papers, patents, copyright, trademark etc. are used to represent novel ideas and experimental findings. Our aim is to discuss various tools that are used to measure the research impact of researchers among communities. This paper also discusses several critical issues which have emerged due to the malpractice in the academic and research community.
This short paper discusses research impact assessment, including important factors to consider when trying to maximise research impact.
Bibliometrics - Tracking Research Impact By Selecting The Appropriate Metrics
Asian Journal of Andrology, 2015
productivity of the researcher and their institution, it does not provide an indication of the quality and significance of a research publication, nor does it indicate the impact the research or the researcher has. Moreover, the reputation and standing of a researcher heavily depend on the impact the individual has had within his or her own research community or field of study. Thus, along with the growing number of publications, the question arises as to how a researcher's influence, standing and reputation, as well as research impact can be measured. A quantitative measure indicates the value of an individual's research to their institution. As a measurable index of research impact, it can then be used as a form of assessment in granting research funds, awarding academic rank and tenure, in determining salaries and projecting annual research targets, as well as staff assessment and hiring new staff, for appropriate selection of examiners for doctoral students, or as selection of plenary or keynote speakers in scientific conferences. It is also a useful method for demonstrating return on investment to funding bodies, as well as to the host institution, industry,
Assessment, evaluations, and definitions of research impact: A review
Research Evaluation, 2014
This article aims to explore what is understood by the term 'research impact' and to provide a comprehensive assimilation of available literature and information, drawing on global experiences to understand the potential for methods and frameworks of impact assessment being implemented for UK impact assessment. We take a more focused look at the impact component of the UK Research Excellence Framework taking place in 2014 and some of the challenges to evaluating impact and the role that systems might play in the future for capturing the links between research and impact and the requirements we have for these systems.
A classification of the use of research indicators
Scientometrics, 2016
Research performance indicators are broadly used, for a range of purposes. The scientific literature on research indicators has a strong methodological focus. There is no comprehensive overview or classification of the use of such indicators. In this paper we give such a classification of research indicator use. Using the journal Scientometrics as a starting point we scrutinized recent journal literature on scientometrics, bibliometrics, research policy, research evaluation, and higher education in order to spot paragraphs or sections that mention indicator use. This led to a classification of research indicator use with 21 categories which can be grouped into five main categories.
Impact factors and databases as instruments for research evaluation
Starting from the question "What should be the real purpose of research evaluation?", I focus on the use of instruments for science policy purposes, presenting an overview of several types of impact factors as used in the scientometric literature. The recently introduced median impact factor receives special attention. I promote the use of citation-publication tables as a visual aid for thinking about impact. Mathematical properties, such as the general pool decomposition theorem are highlighted. Better instruments, i.e. better artefacts and mental schemes, make for better evaluations. Consequently, much more should be done in order to make publication and citation databases optimal instruments for research evaluation.