More than the sea: Review of different approaches to seascapes reveals unique transdisciplinary conceptualizations and contributions of archaeology (original) (raw)
Seascapes mean different things to different people and disciplines. Scholarship over the past 30 years has seen conceptualizations of seascapes move beyond dictionary definitions of seascapes as marine vistas to nuanced understandings of seas variously emphasizing their biological and cultural dimensions. Biological approaches (conservation) focus on marine ecosystems and management aimed at minimizing human impacts with cultural values increasingly acknowledged as critical to the success of marine protected areas. Cultural approaches (heritage, history, anthropology, and archaeology) focus on the symbolic dimensions of seas as culturally constructed and linked to maritime peoples and maritime cultures and identity. Maritime historians have sought to reposition the sea from a backdrop to history to an active and agentive historical actor. Maritime anthropologists have focused on cosmological and cultural underpinnings of customary maritime tenure by small-scale coastal communities. Maritime archaeologists have expanded their research scope from shipwrecks such that seascapes include maritime infrastructure on land. While interdisciplinarity underpins cultural approaches to seascapes, the transdisciplinarity of anthropologically and historically informed archaeologies allows cross-cultural conceptualization of seascapes as extending from the sea (marine seascapes) across adjacent lands (terrestrial seascapes) and ritual engagement with the sea as a sentient and animate realm and cosmologically constructed spiritscape. Ontological notions of sentient seas and agentive seascapes invite future seascape scholarship to further explore more authentic bottom-up, emic, mariners’ and sea peoples’ epistemological positions centering on “how seas think” and “who is the ocean.” Such notions and positions provide enormous scope for archaeologists to further explore the marine and terrestrial expressions of seascapes given that maritime peoples’ social and spiritual relationships with sentient seas are mediated materially by rituals involving sites (e.g., shrines) and objects (e.g., votives) both in the sea and on land.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research.
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
Sentient sea: seascapes as spiritscapes
Handbook of Landscape Archaeology, 2008
This chapter explores the cosmological construction of seascapes and the special ways maritime peoples engage with and control seascapes. The fluidity of seascapes presents unique challenges for cultural inscription and place-marking not generally encountered for landscapes. Focusing on Australian Indigenous seascapes, I argue that a key cosmological element of seascape construction and engagement is spiritscapes and the imbuement of seas with anthropomorphic spiritual entities. For archaeologists, such spiritscapes – as a relational nexus between people, spirits and the sea – are the key to defining, understanding and appreciating ancient seascapes (cf. Thomas 2001). I posit that ancient seascapes as spiritscapes can be accessed and historicised, in part, through archaeological analysis of places of ritual orchestration located strategically across tidal flats and the adjacent coastal zone. An archaeology of seascapes, therefore, necessitates an archaeology of spiritscapes. This is the major theme of this chapter.
Introduction: The Archaeology of Maritime Landscapes
The Archaeology of Maritime Landscapes, 2011
In order to fully understand maritime cultures, maritime archaeology must pursue all aspects of the maritime past. The broader and more inclusive these pursuits, the more fodder there is for the development of sound theories and for crosspollination with anthropology, geography, and other fields. One way to approach the inclusive study of maritime archaeology is to view the maritime past through a broad and geographically oriented landscape perspective.
A History of Maritime Archaeological Thought
Contemporary Philosophy for Maritime Archaeology, 2023
This chapter reviews maritime archaeological theory and changing paradigms from the first shipwreck excavation in the 11th century AD through the advent of modern maritime archaeology in 1960 and contemporary theory today. The chapter is published in Contemporary Philosophy for Maritime Archaeology (2023), which is available to read for free on the Sidestone website: https://www.sidestone.com/books/contemporary-philosophy-for-maritime-archaeology
Terra Australis reports the results of archaeological and related research within the south and east of Asia, though mainly Australia, New Guinea and island Melanesia-lands that remained terra australis incognita to generations of prehistorians. Its subject is the settlement of the diverse environments in this isolated quarter of the globe by peoples who have maintained their discrete and traditional ways of life into the recent recorded or remembered past and at times into the observable present. Since the beginning of the series, the basic colour on the spine and cover has distinguished the regional distribution of topics as follows: ochre for Australia, green for New Guinea, red for SouthEast Asia and blue for the Pacific Islands. From 2001, issues with a gold spine will include conference proceedings, edited papers and monographs which in topic or desired format do not fit easily within the original arrangements. All volumes are numbered within the same series.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Related papers
2021 ‘Maritime Anthropology.’ In Sage Handbook of Cultural Anthropology, edited by Lene Pedersen and Lisa Cliggett. London: SAGE., 2021