Effective Corporate Governance and Financial Reporting in Japan (original) (raw)
Related papers
Social Science Research Network, 2004
Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes. You are not to copy documents for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public.
An Issue of Corporate Governance in Japan: For Whom Companies Exist?
Romanian Economic Business Review, 2010
What is corporate governance? This concept has been interpreted in various ways. In the USA the corporate governance is to subordinate a company's managers to the shareholders' benefit. In contrast, the European type of corporate governance attaches importance to the social value of a company from the standpoint of stakeholders in the wide sense. In this paper I will examine desirable direction of the Japanese type of corporate governance. For that purpose, firstly, specific features and problems of the Japanese style management will be examined. Secondly, introducing opinions of two representative researchers in Japan, problems of the American type of corporate governance will be examined.
The Corporate Governance Model of Japan: Shareholders are Not Rulers
2007
In the U.S. and U.K. corporate governance is concerned with the narrow goal of ensuring that firms maximize the wealth of shareholders. In Japan and some other countries, firms are concerned with a broader group of stakeholders, including employees, suppliers, customers and others as well as shareholders. This article contrasts the Anglo-American system of corporate governance with that in Japan and elsewhere. If markets and institutions are well developed and competitive, Anglo-American corporate governance ensures an efficient allocation of resources. In other circumstances, focusing on a wider range of stakeholders as the Japanese do can be more efficient.
Japanese Corporate Governance: Behind Legal Norms
Penn State international law review, 2011
Corporate governance may be analyzed from different perspectives, one of them being its legal aspect. Instead of examining legal rules governing corporate governance, this paper will analyze the relationship between non-legal norms and corporate governance focusing on the influence that non-legal norms have on the way of functioning of corporate governance in practice. Japanese corporate governance has often been the subject of attention of foreign scholars, particularly in debates on the comparative aspects of corporate governance. 1 The main focus is usually on the rules regulating corporate governance and legal reforms affecting those rules. The main bank system, cross-shareholding and long-term employment are usually mentioned as typical features of the Japanese model of corporate governance. The current literature on Japanese corporate governance relies often on
Corporate Governance Reforms in Japan: Instilling the New Regime
Ovsiannikov, K. (2017). Corporate Governance Reforms in Japan: Instilling the New Regime. Cogent Business & Management, 4(1), 1300993.
This paper analyzes recent transformations in Japanese corporate gover-nance within the context of the 2002 reform of the Japanese Commercial Code and the ensuing legislations. It is widely recognized that ongoing changes in Japanese corporate governance are aimed at incorporating key principles of Anglo-Saxon corporate law. However, this alone does not explain why, under the minimal role of market for corporate control and with predominantly insider-oriented boards, directors of Japanese stock-listed enterprises have become increasingly sensitive to indices reflecting their companies' share value. The paper argues that this shift is caused by the newly emerging regime of veridiction. The latter, as the study indicates , is the normative discourse constituted on the basis of Japanese corporate governance enactments over the last two decades.
Corporate Governance of the Japanese Enterprise
2021
While globalization and IT developments are accelerated, the' management of the enterprise got a different path and required a proper governance for Japanese corporation. Today IS enterprise adapts itself to the change in the socioeconomic system that changes rapidly, suitably, and it is developing management activities in this era of mega competition when only the enterprise which always creates value to the enterprise can survive. Moreover, it is the fulfillment of social responsibility of the corporate ethics which reach even the objectives of environmental management. The most recent research findings categorically evidence that a speedy diversification is taking place among Japanese corporations in terms of corporate governance. Amongst many voluntary and legislative reforms, introduction of executive officer system and outside directors system are attractive. The executive officer system is flattering more popular at an increasing rate. Meanwhile, the latest corporate governance reforms were able to contribute for the enhancement of the corporate performance of the Japanese enterprises. The latest studies confirm, in statistical terms, the relationship between governance reforms and corporate performance is positively significant.
The impact of corporate governance on corporate performance: Evidence from Japan
Pacific-basin Finance Journal, 2008
Employing a unique data set provided by Governance Metrics International, which rates firms using six different corporate governance dimensions, we analyze whether Japanese firms with many governance provisions have a better corporate performance than firms with few governance provisions. Employing an overall index, we find that well-governed firms significantly outperform poorly governed firms by up to 15% a year. Using indices for various governance categories, we find that not all categories affect corporate performance. Governance provisions that deal with financial disclosure, shareholder rights, and remuneration do affect stock price performance. The impact of provisions that deal with board accountability, market for control, and corporate behavior is limited.
Quantification of Corporate Governance: A Trial for Japanese Corporate Governance Quotient (JCGQ)
Social Science Research Network, 2021
The objective of this study is to measure the level of adherence of Japanese companies to the corporate governance eCG) essentials and to understand the structural differences of CG in Japanese companies. On average, Japanese large companies exhibit a moderately satisfactory level of adherence (58.4%). A-type companies demonstrate a quite satisfactory level of adherence (71.3%) than the fairly satisfactory adherence (62.1%) by the JA-type companies and slightly satisfactory level of adherence (55.7%) by the J-type companies. Regrettably the level of compliance (36.4%) by the SMCs is still far away from the expected governance model of this study. This reveals that CG of larger companies is improving rapidly, however there is a broad variation in CG practices across the firms, both large & SMCs and the disparity is large even among larger companies. As far as the category-wise JCGQ is concerned, 'reporting to the shareholders and communicating with investors' came out as the best category or highly reformed area of Japanese CG. In contrast, 'the role of BOD' component needs more attention as its responsiveness is lower, though it has been highly reformed. 'securing fairness and transparency for executive management' and 'leadership responsibility of CEO' components are found as moderately sound areas of Japanese CG. The findings suggest that the overall output of CG reforms is unbalanced as the four elements of the expected model show unequal level of improvement.
Performance Impact at the Board Level: Corporate Governance in Japan
Asian Business & Management, 2007
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the performance impact at the board level in the corporate governance of Japanese companies. We investigated the size as well as the composition in the boardroom, like outside directors and outside auditors and applied this to a set of 821 Japanese manufacturing companies. We found evidence that board size does not matter but a higher ratio of outside directors / outside auditors associates to a better performance of the companies. As a second step, we put Japanese companies into three groups, "traditional companies" (without outside directors), "new Japanese companies" (which appointed outside directors) and as a third group companies who decided to apply to the "US-style system" of committees. Traditional Japanese companies showed the weakest performance and USstyle Japanese companies the strongest performance. This result is highly important as it says that Japanese companies are better off having a high ratio of outside directors and outside auditors. In 3 addition to this, our second area of research suggests that Japanese companies who might think about getting financed by the capital market should introduce the US-style system, as they clearly outperformed the other categories.