9. “Shaping Holocaust Memory in Greece: Memorials and Their Public History”, National Identities, April 2015, σ. 199- 216 (original) (raw)
Related papers
Two of the most significant characteristics of post-modern societies are presentism as a dominant status of historicity and confrontation with the traumatic past, namely that of World War II. Considering Distomo as one of the cities-symbols that endured the genocidal violence of National Socialism, as one of the main loci of memory in the Greek historical martyrdom, and as a focal point in the European network of martyr cities, the aforementioned confrontation concerns firstly, the management of the event in reference to identity and historical consciousness, a choice that points towards certain politics of memory in the local society, and, secondly, the moral claim for the recognition of the city’s suffering and the undertaking of responsibilities by the German State. In light of these, the authors approach the issue from a twofold point of view, that is, (a) by analyzing the ways National Socialism, WWII and the mass execution of Distomo’ residents are presented in secondary education history textbooks, and (b) by the interdisciplinary presentation of the local community’s memory politics, which are manifested in the Museum for the Victims of National Socialism and their Mausoleum, around which commemorative and performative rituals are organised on an annual basis. Apart from elevating the role of ceremonies in the memory-making process, this interdisciplinary approach researches the function of education within the official ceremonies, as an important field in the construction of memory.
The Holocaust in Greece, 2018
"For the sizeable Jewish community living in Greece during the 1940s, German occupation of Greece posed a distinct threat. The Nazis and their collaborators murdered around 90 percent of the Jewish population through the course of the war. This new account presents cutting edge research on four elements of the Holocaust in Greece: the level of antisemitism and question of collaboration; the fate of Jewish property before, during, and after their deportation; how the few surviving Jews were treated following their return to Greece, especially in terms of justice and restitution; and the ways in which Jewish communities rebuilt themselves both in Greece and abroad. Taken together, these elements point to who was to blame for the disaster that befell Jewish communities in Greece, and show that the occupation authorities alone could not have carried out these actions to such magnitude without the active participation of Greek Christians." (book annotation)
Commemorating World War II in Northern Greece: Controversy and Reconsideration
Forum For Modern Language Studies, 2008
This article seeks to examine the World War II memorials that were commissioned by the Greek state and other public institutions in Komotini, a city in Western Thrace, as well as their ambiguous reception during the last three decades. It focuses particularly on “The Sword”, a memorial that was erected during the years of the Greek military dictatorship (1967–1974) to honour the victims of World War II who gave their lives for their country. It sheds light on the process behind the creation of “The Sword”, analysing also its artistic style and visual references in connection with the historical conditions of its creation. The article also considers the recent dispute surrounding the function and aesthetics of the monument, and alternative forms of memorialisation erected in the area in the last decade.
International journal of humanities and social science, 2012
This article operates on two main levels: it utilizes the theoretical framework of memory studies in order to examine the place of Greek Jews in the context of contemporary social and cultural memory in Greece on the one level, and it studies the case of Greek Jews from the point of view of history education on the other. The study points out that the viewpoints and the reactions of contemporary Greeks to the past and the present of their Jewish compatriots are very contradictory. Besides this, the dominant ideology and the conservative perception of national identity seem to be exclusive of “otherness”. So, Greek Jews do not constitute a strong part of historical memory; their past and present, in contrast to the “official memory”, is very marginal. In consequence of this, contemporary Greeks, even student teachers, do not have sufficient knowledge about the roots of Jews in Greece, about their culture or about the Holocaust. History education is, from this point of view, an examp...
Heritage and Memory of the First World War in Greece during the Interwar Period
2018
The memory of the First World War in Greece has suffered throughout the years a gradual decline, which is comparable to the case of many other countries, mostly in areas of Eastern and Southeastern Europe. The Great War mattered somehow for politicians, the press and public opinion in Greece only in the interwar years. During that period, discourse about the First World War included the echo of traumatic events related to Greek involvement in the war (such as the surrender of Fort Roupel to Central Powers forces and the bloody clashes of December 1916 in Athens after the landing of Entente troops) and the efforts to erect war memorials as a tribute to the sacrifice of fallen soldiers, both Greeks and foreigners. At the same time, the Greek people had the opportunity to learn a lot about the international dimension of the war through newspapers, where translated memoirs of leading wartime figures (of both alliances) were published. After the outbreak of the Second World War, interest in the previous major conflict (including the Greek role in the hostilities) significantly diminished in the country. Taking into consideration the ongoing experience of the centenary manifestations, the author proposes a codification of the main types (existing or potential) of WWI memory in Greece and suggests new ways of approaching this major historical event. The final chapter addresses some possible causes of the troublesome relation of Greeks with the First World War, which is mainly due to the very particular circumstances of Greek involvement in the war and the determining role of later historical events that overshadowed memories of the earlier conflict.
“12 October 1944. Liberation, Trauma, and Memorialization in Greece
This year, 2014, marks the 70 th anniversary of the end of the Second World War in Greece, and 12 October marks the 70 th anniversary of the Liberation of Athens. We wanted to note this anniversary with a paper that would deal with the importance of the event and would explain the peculiar absence of its official commemoration. We invited prominent historian of the era, Taso ula Vervenioti, to offer us her thoughts on this matter.
Monuments for World War II: Memory and Oblivion in the Balkans and Central-East Europe Proceedings of the International Conference, Theocharakis Foundation for Fine Arts & Music, Athens, 23‒24 November 2023 Edited by Areti Adamopoulou / Anna Maria Droumpouki, 2024
At the beginning of the twentieth-first century, memory of the Holocaust is produced and communicated in Thessaloniki through multi-sensory embodied practices in the form of imagined testimony performances of the near-total extermination of the city’s Jewish community in Auschwitz as well as of resistance against the dominant discourse on the city’s cultural heritage and identity. Holocaust commemoration is no longer anchored in public monuments but intertwined with social activism and “occurs” in urban space as an ongoing performance of claiming the city as it could be.
Rethinking History, 2024
Open Access: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13642529.2024.2425879 What can the Battle of Lepanto (1571) reveal about the interconnected politics of nationalism and racism in contemporary Europe? Linking memory studies, critical heritage and the history of European-Ottoman wars, this article uses the 450th anniversary of the historic battle as an entry point for rethinking the politics of commemoration in modern Greece. It takes a multi-scalar perspective which charts memory-making across different spatial and temporal scales and examines the role of mnemonic practices as articulations of Greek nationalism blended with dependence on Greece’s Euro-Atlantic patrons. The article situates the 450th anniversary of Lepanto within a larger commemorative tradition and long-term development of civic rituals and representational conventions. In doing so, it highlights the dynamics of voicing and silencing that shapes public history in ways that sanitise the past and obfuscate complex historical processes. Specifically, the article shows how the erasure of the Black history of Nafpaktos (the Greek town associated with Lepanto) and portrayals of the Greeks as an anti-Islamic nation have reinforced Eurocentric civilisational narratives, occluding histories of colonialism and empire that continue to cast their shadows today.